Agencies adopt plan to fight domestic terrorism

Six federal agencies have teamed up to develop a plan for responding to terrorist threats and incidents involving weapons of mass destruction. The FBI and the Federal Emergency Management Agency will take the lead in handling domestic threats and acts, according to a plan released last week and signed by several Clinton administration agency heads shortly before President Bush took office in January. The other agencies involved in the effort are the Departments of Defense, Energy and Health and Human Services, and the Environmental Protection Agency. The plan, based on a 1995 presidential directive (PDD-39), outlines how the federal government intends to respond to terrorism, particularly acts that involve chemical or biological warfare. It also provides guidance for federal, state and local agencies on preparing for and dealing with potential threats and incidents. Marc Wolfson, a spokesman on domestic terrorism for FEMA, said that although the interagency guidance on domestic terrorism was a Clinton initiative, the Bush administration has indicated it will continue the plan. Under the plan, the FBI is responsible for coordinating law enforcement activities that would prevent and "resolve" acts of terrorism, such as apprehending and prosecuting terrorists. FEMA is the lead agency for providing disaster relief to the victims of terrorism, protecting property and restoring government services. In the event of a terrorist threat or incident involving weapons of mass destruction, Defense will provide military assistance, while Energy and EPA will supply scientific personnel and equipment. Health and Human Services is charged with planning and preparing a national response to medical emergencies stemming from terrorist attacks. The strategic plan identifies four terrorist threat levels--ranging from a minimal terrorist threat (Level 4) to an incident involving weapons of mass destruction (Level 1)--and lists the agencies' responsibilities at each stage. For example, a Level 2 threat would call for law enforcement activities aimed at preventing and halting a terrorist act, while a Level 1 incident would aim at protecting public health and safety. Agencies must fund antiterrorist activities themselves, and must be able to provide assistance to state and local governments on short notice. Although the plan focuses on the role of federal agencies in combating domestic terrorism, it emphasized the importance of cooperation and communication among federal, state and local governments. "The resolution to an act of terrorism demands an extraordinary level of coordination of crisis and consequence management functions and technical expertise across all levels of government," said the report. "It is critical that all participating federal, state and local agencies interact in a seamless manner."
Stay up-to-date with federal news alerts and analysis — Sign up for GovExec's email newsletters.
Close [ x ] More from GovExec

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from
We think these reports might interest you:

  • Sponsored by G Suite

    Cross-Agency Teamwork, Anytime and Anywhere

    Dan McCrae, director of IT service delivery division, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA)

  • Data-Centric Security vs. Database-Level Security

    Database-level encryption had its origins in the 1990s and early 2000s in response to very basic risks which largely revolved around the theft of servers, backup tapes and other physical-layer assets. As noted in Verizon’s 2014, Data Breach Investigations Report (DBIR)1, threats today are far more advanced and dangerous.

  • Sponsored by One Identity

    One Nation Under Guard: Securing User Identities Across State and Local Government

    In 2016, the government can expect even more sophisticated threats on the horizon, making it all the more imperative that agencies enforce proper identity and access management (IAM) practices. In order to better measure the current state of IAM at the state and local level, Government Business Council (GBC) conducted an in-depth research study of state and local employees.

  • Sponsored by Aquilent

    The Next Federal Evolution of Cloud

    This GBC report explains the evolution of cloud computing in federal government, and provides an outlook for the future of the cloud in government IT.

  • Sponsored by LTC Partners, administrators of the Federal Long Term Care Insurance Program

    Approaching the Brink of Federal Retirement

    Approximately 10,000 baby boomers are reaching retirement age per day, and a growing number of federal employees are preparing themselves for the next chapter of their lives. Learn how to tackle the challenges that today's workforce faces in laying the groundwork for a smooth and secure retirement.

  • Sponsored by Hewlett Packard Enterprise

    Cyber Defense 101: Arming the Next Generation of Government Employees

    Read this issue brief to learn about the sector's most potent challenges in the new cyber landscape and how government organizations are building a robust, threat-aware infrastructure

  • Sponsored by Aquilent

    GBC Issue Brief: Cultivating Digital Services in the Federal Landscape

    Read this GBC issue brief to learn more about the current state of digital services in the government, and how key players are pushing enhancements towards a user-centric approach.


When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.