Debate Over LGBT Discrimination at Federal Contractors Leads to Shouting Match on House Floor

Rep. Sean Patrick Maloney, D-N.Y., introduced the narrowly failed amendment that would have prevented federal contractors from discriminating against LGBT employees. Rep. Sean Patrick Maloney, D-N.Y., introduced the narrowly failed amendment that would have prevented federal contractors from discriminating against LGBT employees. Seth Wenig/AP file photo

House Republicans were forced to deploy controversial tactics on Thursday to block an amendment that would have prevented federal contractors from discriminating against lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender employees.

The amendment to the fiscal 2017 Veterans Affairs Department and military construction appropriations bill, introduced by Rep. Sean Patrick Maloney, D-N.Y., initially received enough support to pass as the allotted time for the vote expired, but the time was extended to allow just enough Republicans to change their votes. The amendment ultimately failed 212-213.

Maloney reportedly introduced the amendment in response to a provision included in the defense authorization bill that federal contract recipients could not be discriminated against on a religious basis. Critics said that language would enable federal contractors to ignore an executive order President Obama signed in 2014 to prohibit the recipients from discriminating against LGBT employees.

Democrats on the House floor jeered and chanted “shame” as Republican lawmakers changed their votes from "yes" to "no." The vote came shortly after the House approved an amendment that would prohibit the Confederate flag from flying at federal cemeteries, an issue that held up the appropriations process last year.

Obama’s 2014 order expanded upon a memorandum issued by President Lyndon Johnson in 1965 that prohibited federal contractors from discriminating “against any employee or applicant for employment because of race, color, religion, sex or national origin,” to include sexual orientation and gender identity.

Some viewed that order as controversial, as it did not carve out an exception for religiously affiliated contractors. Instead, the White House pointed to an existing order issued by President George W. Bush -- which allows such contractors to consider an applicant’s religion when hiring -- as an adequate exemption for faith-based organizations.

"America’s federal contracts should not subsidize discrimination against the American people," Obama said when signing the order.

The entire argument is largely a symbolic one, according to a group that represents hundreds of federal contractors.

“We shouldn’t lose sight of the fact that this action is a proxy for pushing for broader legislation and not because there is any evidence of a particular problem among government contractors when it comes to equality of employment or job performance,” the Professional Services Council said in a statement at the time.

According to Minority Whip Steny Hoyer, D-Md., the Republican lawmakers who switched their votes were Reps. Jeff Denham, Calif.; Darrell Issa, Calif.; Bruce Poliquin, Maine; David Valadao, Calif.; Greg Walden, Ore.; Mimi Walters, Calif.; and David Young, Iowa.

Stay up-to-date with federal news alerts and analysis — Sign up for GovExec's email newsletters.
Close [ x ] More from GovExec

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from
We think these reports might interest you:

  • Forecasting Cloud's Future

    Conversations with Federal, State, and Local Technology Leaders on Cloud-Driven Digital Transformation

  • The Big Data Campaign Trail

    With everyone so focused on security following recent breaches at federal, state and local government and education institutions, there has been little emphasis on the need for better operations. This report breaks down some of the biggest operational challenges in IT management and provides insight into how agencies and leaders can successfully solve some of the biggest lingering government IT issues.

  • Communicating Innovation in Federal Government

    Federal Government spending on ‘obsolete technology’ continues to increase. Supporting the twin pillars of improved digital service delivery for citizens on the one hand, and the increasingly optimized and flexible working practices for federal employees on the other, are neither easy nor inexpensive tasks. This whitepaper explores how federal agencies can leverage the value of existing agency technology assets while offering IT leaders the ability to implement the kind of employee productivity, citizen service improvements and security demanded by federal oversight.

  • IT Transformation Trends: Flash Storage as a Strategic IT Asset

    MIT Technology Review: Flash Storage As a Strategic IT Asset For the first time in decades, IT leaders now consider all-flash storage as a strategic IT asset. IT has become a new operating model that enables self-service with high performance, density and resiliency. It also offers the self-service agility of the public cloud combined with the security, performance, and cost-effectiveness of a private cloud. Download this MIT Technology Review paper to learn more about how all-flash storage is transforming the data center.

  • Ongoing Efforts in Veterans Health Care Modernization

    This report discusses the current state of veterans health care


When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.