Contractors Question New Rules on Hiring Veterans, People With Disabilities

“That means that on the highest end of these estimates, the two rules will cost up to $1.1 billion in the first year of implementation,” OFCCP Director Patricia Shiu said. “That means that on the highest end of these estimates, the two rules will cost up to $1.1 billion in the first year of implementation,” OFCCP Director Patricia Shiu said. Flickr user americanprogress

Two rules set new goals for federal contractors on hiring veterans and people with disabilities will increase paperwork and costs for companies that do business with the government -- but by how much depends on who you ask.

A commercial construction contractors group has charged the rules will cost companies nearly $6 billion a year in compliance costs, a figure the government strongly disputes.

Under one of the new rules, federal contractors must set benchmarks for veteran hiring either at the the national level of 8 percent or based on their own analysis of the best available data, as part of an update to the 1974 Vietnam Era Veterans’ Readjustment Assistance Act. This rule increases record-keeping mandates and clarifies job listing and subcontractor requirements, the Labor Department’s Office of Federal Contract Compliance Programs said.

Under another rule, contractors also must strive to fill 7 percent of each job group in their workforces with qualified people with disabilities. This rule, which updates the 1973 Rehabilitation Act, also sets new recruiting, training and record-keeping requirements similar to those aiming to protect women and minorities in the workplace.

While the goals are laudable, Alan Chvotkin, executive vice president of the Professional Services Council, which advocates for federal contractors, had concerns about their implementation.  He said the first rule fails to fully address true barriers to hiring veterans -- getting employees with appropriate experience levels and meeting other workforce requirements.  With regard to the second rule, he said, applying the disability hiring goal to all job groups “may exponentially raise the challenge of compliance.”

“I understand some of the rationale behind it,” he said. “You don’t want people with disabilities slotted to only menial or nonprofessional work.” But, he added, it can be a real challenge to find find qualified disabled applicants in all job categories, which he said is uncharted territory for federal regulations.

Stephen E. Sandherr, CEO of Associated General Contractors of America, was sharper in expressing opposition to the regulations.

“These rules will force federal contractors to spend an estimated $6 billion a year to produce reams of new paperwork proving they are doing what the federal government already knows they are doing,” he said in a statement posted to his group’s website.

OFCCP Director Patricia Shiu rejected that figure, saying the disability hiring rule is expected to cost between $349 million and $659 million, and the veteran rule to run between $177 million and $483 million.

“That means that on the highest end of these estimates, the two rules will cost up to $1.1 billion in the first year of implementation,” Shiu said in a statement emailed to Government Executive. “The cost per establishment comes out to a max of $4,550 per establishment for the first year.”

In a statement accompanying OFCCP's announcement of the new rules, Labor Secretary Thomas E. Perez said, "In a competitive job market, employers need access to the best possible employees.These rules make it easier for employers to tap into a large, diverse pool of qualified candidates."

The rules are scheduled to take effect 180 days after they appear in the Federal Register, which should happen “shortly,” OFCCP said.

Stay up-to-date with federal news alerts and analysis — Sign up for GovExec's email newsletters.
FROM OUR SPONSORS
JOIN THE DISCUSSION
Close [ x ] More from GovExec
 
 

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from GovExec.com.
We think these reports might interest you:

  • Forecasting Cloud's Future

    Conversations with Federal, State, and Local Technology Leaders on Cloud-Driven Digital Transformation

    Download
  • The Big Data Campaign Trail

    With everyone so focused on security following recent breaches at federal, state and local government and education institutions, there has been little emphasis on the need for better operations. This report breaks down some of the biggest operational challenges in IT management and provides insight into how agencies and leaders can successfully solve some of the biggest lingering government IT issues.

    Download
  • Communicating Innovation in Federal Government

    Federal Government spending on ‘obsolete technology’ continues to increase. Supporting the twin pillars of improved digital service delivery for citizens on the one hand, and the increasingly optimized and flexible working practices for federal employees on the other, are neither easy nor inexpensive tasks. This whitepaper explores how federal agencies can leverage the value of existing agency technology assets while offering IT leaders the ability to implement the kind of employee productivity, citizen service improvements and security demanded by federal oversight.

    Download
  • IT Transformation Trends: Flash Storage as a Strategic IT Asset

    MIT Technology Review: Flash Storage As a Strategic IT Asset For the first time in decades, IT leaders now consider all-flash storage as a strategic IT asset. IT has become a new operating model that enables self-service with high performance, density and resiliency. It also offers the self-service agility of the public cloud combined with the security, performance, and cost-effectiveness of a private cloud. Download this MIT Technology Review paper to learn more about how all-flash storage is transforming the data center.

    Download
  • Ongoing Efforts in Veterans Health Care Modernization

    This report discusses the current state of veterans health care

    Download

When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.