Federal Contractors Failing to Pay Afghan Subcontractors, IG Finds

Afghan contractors work in Kabul in December. Afghan contractors work in Kabul in December. Musadeq Sadeq/AP

U.S. contractors in war-torn Afghanistan have repeatedly failed to pay their subcontractors, prompting strikes, work stoppages and death threats at a time when U.S. forces are preparing to withdraw, a key inspector general warned on Thursday.

In an alert letter to Secretary of State John Kerry, Defense Secretary Chuck Hagel and regional diplomats, John Sopko, the special inspector general for Afghanistan reconstruction, said that nearly a quarter -- 183 out of 753 -- of complaints to SIGAR’s hotline from 2009 through October 2012 were about Afghan prime contractor and subcontractor nonpayment issues. As a result, he said, his auditors have opened 52 investigations encompassing $69 million in payments owed. An additional 44 such complaints have been filed with the State Department, the U.S. Agency for International Development, and the Defense Department’s inspectors general over the past six years.

Missed payments have resulted in the delay of projects “promoting the stability of Afghanistan,” a belief among Afghan workers that the lapsed payments are the fault of the U.S. government, a threat by one subcontractor to set himself on fire in front of the U.S. embassy, and one threat to blow up a compound of U.S. contractors and government agencies, the letter said.

“We urge you to determine the extent of this problem in the contracts your agency has awarded for Afghanistan reconstruction projects,” Sopko wrote, “and to use any and all possible remedies to (1) more aggressively oversee these contractors and help ensure that Afghanistan subcontractors receive prompt payment for their work and (2) ensure that parties with contract payment disputes resolve these issues according to contract terms.”

Sopko added that his agency can assist with criminal, civil, and administrative responses to the problems.

Stay up-to-date with federal news alerts and analysis — Sign up for GovExec's email newsletters.
FROM OUR SPONSORS
JOIN THE DISCUSSION
Close [ x ] More from GovExec
 
 

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from GovExec.com.
We think these reports might interest you:

  • Sponsored by G Suite

    Cross-Agency Teamwork, Anytime and Anywhere

    Dan McCrae, director of IT service delivery division, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA)

    Download
  • Data-Centric Security vs. Database-Level Security

    Database-level encryption had its origins in the 1990s and early 2000s in response to very basic risks which largely revolved around the theft of servers, backup tapes and other physical-layer assets. As noted in Verizon’s 2014, Data Breach Investigations Report (DBIR)1, threats today are far more advanced and dangerous.

    Download
  • Federal IT Applications: Assessing Government's Core Drivers

    In order to better understand the current state of external and internal-facing agency workplace applications, Government Business Council (GBC) and Riverbed undertook an in-depth research study of federal employees. Overall, survey findings indicate that federal IT applications still face a gamut of challenges with regard to quality, reliability, and performance management.

    Download
  • PIV- I And Multifactor Authentication: The Best Defense for Federal Government Contractors

    This white paper explores NIST SP 800-171 and why compliance is critical to federal government contractors, especially those that work with the Department of Defense, as well as how leveraging PIV-I credentialing with multifactor authentication can be used as a defense against cyberattacks

    Download
  • Toward A More Innovative Government

    This research study aims to understand how state and local leaders regard their agency’s innovation efforts and what they are doing to overcome the challenges they face in successfully implementing these efforts.

    Download
  • From Volume to Value: UK’s NHS Digital Provides U.S. Healthcare Agencies A Roadmap For Value-Based Payment Models

    The U.S. healthcare industry is rapidly moving away from traditional fee-for-service models and towards value-based purchasing that reimburses physicians for quality of care in place of frequency of care.

    Download
  • GBC Flash Poll: Is Your Agency Safe?

    Federal leaders weigh in on the state of information security

    Download

When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.