Contractors Protest Continuing Bad News on Sequestration

Scott Rothstein/

A top contractors group on Tuesday published an open letter declaring that “time is up” and imploring President Obama and Congress to hurry toward a new budget compromise to head off automatic spending cuts before they begin on Friday.

A Pentagon official cited looming sequestration in explaining a decision to begin slowing payments to prime contractors to increase on-hand cash, according to a report in the Federal Times. Contractors will be notified in the next few days, an unnamed official said, and Defense accounts will gain about $1 billion in available funds.

The executive board of the Arlington, Va.-based Professional Services Council, in a letter to the White House and all congressional offices, said the group’s 360 member companies “urge you in the strongest terms to act quickly and collaboratively to avoid the threatened sequestration and finally address the fiscal uncertainty that is undermining the government’s ability to execute its many and complex missions.”

After 18 months of anticipating sequestration, the contractors blasted political leaders for having “failed to act to stop this manufactured component of the fiscal crisis.”

PSC President and CEO Stan Soloway said, “Our association’s leaders, like many others in the business community, believe strongly that the health of our economy, including jobs creation and retention, mandates a combination of strong government leadership, collaboration with affected companies and balanced compromise.”

The 18 months contractors have spent seeking to avoid sequestration have included significant political investing in lobbying, noted a new study released on Monday by the nonprofit Sunlight Foundation. It estimated that 10 companies might lose $13.6 billion in contracts affected by sequestration and put those companies’ investment in Washington lobbying at $115 million. At a 125-to-one return, that “starts to look like a bargain,” wrote Sunlight analyst Lee Drutman.

He suggested that the companies are not spending more because “they haven’t figured out how to solve the collective action problem and are instead under- investing because they’d rather somebody else bear the burden of convincing stubborn members of Congress to avoid sequester.”

PSC’s Soloway said the industry “understands the necessity and inevitability of federal spending reductions and accepts that it will feel its share of the associated pain. But in making those reductions, agencies should have the flexibility to do so strategically, collaboratively and holistically so as not to hurt mission execution.”

The group’s letter laid out two principles for cutting agency budgets. “Reductions must be made strategically and collaboratively,” it said. “You must direct the government’s agencies and their critical stakeholders, including federal employees, contractors, nonprofits and others, to work together to jointly identify meaningful, sustainable efficiencies and/or alternative means of service delivery.”

Secondly, the challenge of cutting “must be viewed holistically,” the contractors wrote, “from the perspective of the ‘whole of government.’ Arbitrarily cutting federal employee positions is no more strategic or likely to result in success than arbitrarily cutting spending on contracted services, university or nonprofit support.”

(Image via Scott Rothstein/

Stay up-to-date with federal news alerts and analysis — Sign up for GovExec's email newsletters.
Close [ x ] More from GovExec

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from
We think these reports might interest you:

  • Sponsored by G Suite

    Cross-Agency Teamwork, Anytime and Anywhere

    Dan McCrae, director of IT service delivery division, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA)

  • Data-Centric Security vs. Database-Level Security

    Database-level encryption had its origins in the 1990s and early 2000s in response to very basic risks which largely revolved around the theft of servers, backup tapes and other physical-layer assets. As noted in Verizon’s 2014, Data Breach Investigations Report (DBIR)1, threats today are far more advanced and dangerous.

  • Sponsored by One Identity

    One Nation Under Guard: Securing User Identities Across State and Local Government

    In 2016, the government can expect even more sophisticated threats on the horizon, making it all the more imperative that agencies enforce proper identity and access management (IAM) practices. In order to better measure the current state of IAM at the state and local level, Government Business Council (GBC) conducted an in-depth research study of state and local employees.

  • Sponsored by Aquilent

    The Next Federal Evolution of Cloud

    This GBC report explains the evolution of cloud computing in federal government, and provides an outlook for the future of the cloud in government IT.

  • Sponsored by LTC Partners, administrators of the Federal Long Term Care Insurance Program

    Approaching the Brink of Federal Retirement

    Approximately 10,000 baby boomers are reaching retirement age per day, and a growing number of federal employees are preparing themselves for the next chapter of their lives. Learn how to tackle the challenges that today's workforce faces in laying the groundwork for a smooth and secure retirement.

  • Sponsored by Hewlett Packard Enterprise

    Cyber Defense 101: Arming the Next Generation of Government Employees

    Read this issue brief to learn about the sector's most potent challenges in the new cyber landscape and how government organizations are building a robust, threat-aware infrastructure

  • Sponsored by Aquilent

    GBC Issue Brief: Cultivating Digital Services in the Federal Landscape

    Read this GBC issue brief to learn more about the current state of digital services in the government, and how key players are pushing enhancements towards a user-centric approach.


When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.