Consider sending layoff warnings, law firm tells federal contractors

Steve Cukrov/

With sequestration delayed until early March, contractors should consider issuing sequestration-related layoff notices despite an absence of guidance from the Obama administration, according to a law firm.

In an analysis by Littler Mendelson, a labor and employment law firm, government contractors could face lawsuits if they do not issue layoff notices to comply with  the 1988 Worker Adjustment and Retraining Notification Act.

The law requires any company with more than 100 employees to issue layoff notices 60 days in advance of any mass layoff or plant closure. With sequestration delayed by the major budget agreement signed by President Obama on Tuesday, the briefing says, companies may need to act fast to avoid falling afoul of federal or state versions of the WARN Act.

“In light of the additional two months of sequestration breathing room provided by the tax bill, employers potentially affected by sequestration who have not previously provided contingent WARN notices may now wish to consider doing so,” the briefing said. “Employers who gave contingent WARN notice in October, effective Jan. 2, will generally wish to issue new contingent notices effective in early March.”

The largest federal contractors did not issue WARN notices last fall and await further information now.

Boeing Co. spokesman Dan Beck told Government Executive his firm would wait until guidance was issued by “defense and government customers” before issuing notices.  Lockheed Martin in a statement on Tuesday said that the specter of sequestration “stifles investment in plant, equipment, people and future research.”

In September, the Office of Management and Budget told contractors to follow guidance issued by the Labor Department and hold off on WARN Act notices. OMB also said that the government would cover the costs of litigation resulting from delayed layoff notices.

But Littler Mendelson said companies may still face costs from legal battles in court. “It is also not clear what degree of deference courts will give to the DOL's guidance letter, and employers may still find themselves subject to a court's individualized assessment of WARN compliance,” the briefing said.

The White House has encouraged agencies to continue normal spending and operations, and an OMB spokesman told Government Executive the agency would provide further guidance and close coordination as time progresses.

Alan Chvotkin, executive vice president and counsel of the Professional Services Council, a contractor trade group, said  many companies will have spent a significant amount of resources understanding the legal obligations if sequestration occurs, but will be biding their time until more details are released.

Companies “will wait until sequestration occurs and the federal agency directs how that sequestration would affect specific contracts that a company has,” Chvotkin said.

(Image via Steve Cukrov/

Stay up-to-date with federal news alerts and analysis — Sign up for GovExec's email newsletters.
Close [ x ] More from GovExec

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from
We think these reports might interest you:

  • Sponsored by G Suite

    Cross-Agency Teamwork, Anytime and Anywhere

    Dan McCrae, director of IT service delivery division, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA)

  • Data-Centric Security vs. Database-Level Security

    Database-level encryption had its origins in the 1990s and early 2000s in response to very basic risks which largely revolved around the theft of servers, backup tapes and other physical-layer assets. As noted in Verizon’s 2014, Data Breach Investigations Report (DBIR)1, threats today are far more advanced and dangerous.

  • Federal IT Applications: Assessing Government's Core Drivers

    In order to better understand the current state of external and internal-facing agency workplace applications, Government Business Council (GBC) and Riverbed undertook an in-depth research study of federal employees. Overall, survey findings indicate that federal IT applications still face a gamut of challenges with regard to quality, reliability, and performance management.

  • PIV- I And Multifactor Authentication: The Best Defense for Federal Government Contractors

    This white paper explores NIST SP 800-171 and why compliance is critical to federal government contractors, especially those that work with the Department of Defense, as well as how leveraging PIV-I credentialing with multifactor authentication can be used as a defense against cyberattacks

  • Toward A More Innovative Government

    This research study aims to understand how state and local leaders regard their agency’s innovation efforts and what they are doing to overcome the challenges they face in successfully implementing these efforts.

  • From Volume to Value: UK’s NHS Digital Provides U.S. Healthcare Agencies A Roadmap For Value-Based Payment Models

    The U.S. healthcare industry is rapidly moving away from traditional fee-for-service models and towards value-based purchasing that reimburses physicians for quality of care in place of frequency of care.

  • GBC Flash Poll: Is Your Agency Safe?

    Federal leaders weigh in on the state of information security


When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.