Lawmaker pressures GSA on plan to trim obsolete contract offerings
- By Charles S. Clark
- November 29, 2012
- Comments
In his letter, Rep. Sam Graves, R-Mo., said he is troubled that the planned changes “may limit the federal government’s ability to afford small businesses the maximum practicable opportunity to compete."
Kelley McCall/AP file photo
House Small Business Committee Chairman Rep. Sam Graves, R-Mo., is pressing the General Services Administration to reconsider long-planned reforms to save money by trimming its roster of eligible vendors for multiple-award schedule contracts in such areas as office supplies.
In a letter to acting GSA Administrator Dan Tangherlini released Thursday, Graves referenced the agency leader’s attempts to “rein in abuses of the system” at the agency that has been reeling from public exposure of overspending at conferences. He asked the administrator to involve himself in the effort to move to what is called a “demand-based approach” that narrows the list of active suppliers.
At a hearing in June, Graves’ committee brought in an array of small business owners to challenge testimony explaining the reforms by Stephen Kempf, Federal Acquisition Service commissioner. Kempf in September went on medical leave following revelations about an awards conference with questionable expenses.
In his letter Graves said he is troubled that the planned changes “may limit the federal government’s ability to afford small businesses the maximum practicable opportunity to compete. Specifically, based on the information presented to the committee, I do not think that GSA’s proposals will enhance small business viability, improve operational efficiency or result in cost control.” The demand-based proposal “demonstrates a lack of understanding of how small businesses operate in relation to the federal market,” he added. “Given the wildly divergent estimates of cost savings . . . I am not convinced GSA understands its own cost model.”
Graves’ letter follows a more detailed Oct. 25 comment his committee filed in response to GSA’s publication of a notice in the Federal Register.
By using this service you agree not to post material that is obscene, harassing, defamatory, or otherwise objectionable. Although GovExec.com does not monitor comments posted to this site (and has no obligation to), it reserves the right to delete, edit, or move any material that it deems to be in violation of this rule.
Furlough 'Consistency and Fairness'
Innovation in Government Dips
TSP Funds Stay Positive in April
5 Agencies with the Most Disconnected Leadership
No Bonuses for VA Benefits Execs
Will You Be Furloughed?
Cutting costs: Inside the effort to improve the efficiency of federal operations
Sponsored
3 Ways Data is Improving DoD Performance
Research Report: Powering Continuous Monitoring Through Big Data
Need to Know Memo: Big Data
