GAO faults Pentagon data measuring insourcing

Dennis Cook/AP

Days before the release of the Obama administration’s fiscal 2013 defense budget, the Pentagon’s three-year effort to move more contractor work in-house drew criticism from auditors for lacking clear and internally consistent data measuring progress.

The Government Accountability Office, in an assessment released Thursday and required under the 2011 Defense Authorization Act, found that the Defense Department did not report how many contractor employees were moved into government staff positions because it does not keep such data. Pentagon officials told GAO they focus on services delivered by contractors and leave it up to contractors to determine the number of employees needed to do a job.

Defense officials do track the number of new civilian positions authorized as a result of the 2010 insourcing initiative, which is designed to better control functions deemed inherently governmental and to reduce the $200 billion spent annually on contractors. But Congress, the auditors said, required the Office of the Undersecretary of Defense for Personnel and Readiness to report use of contractors in terms of full-time equivalents.

GAO also faulted the reliability of data that Defense managers assembled from components of the department. The Navy’s Fleet Forces Command, for example, categorized 348 of 354 new insourcing authorizations as “inherently governmental when they should have been designated as exempt from private sector performance for continuity of infrastructure operations,” auditors said.

Nor did the data collected on insourcing properly align with strategic workforce plans, GAO added. Such plans could well change in the coming budget year, according to outside analysts.

Finally, Defense managers acknowledged that they had “coded jobs by occupational series, such as budget analyst, while the insourcing report used function codes indicating broad areas of work, such as logistics.” There is no crosswalk between the two, the report said.

Defense officials agreed that creating better metrics would help them continue using insourcing to find the right workforce mix to maintain readiness while assuring that all inherently governmental functions are performed by federal employees.

Stay up-to-date with federal news alerts and analysis — Sign up for GovExec's email newsletters.
Close [ x ] More from GovExec

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from
We think these reports might interest you:

  • Sponsored by G Suite

    Cross-Agency Teamwork, Anytime and Anywhere

    Dan McCrae, director of IT service delivery division, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA)

  • Data-Centric Security vs. Database-Level Security

    Database-level encryption had its origins in the 1990s and early 2000s in response to very basic risks which largely revolved around the theft of servers, backup tapes and other physical-layer assets. As noted in Verizon’s 2014, Data Breach Investigations Report (DBIR)1, threats today are far more advanced and dangerous.

  • Federal IT Applications: Assessing Government's Core Drivers

    In order to better understand the current state of external and internal-facing agency workplace applications, Government Business Council (GBC) and Riverbed undertook an in-depth research study of federal employees. Overall, survey findings indicate that federal IT applications still face a gamut of challenges with regard to quality, reliability, and performance management.

  • PIV- I And Multifactor Authentication: The Best Defense for Federal Government Contractors

    This white paper explores NIST SP 800-171 and why compliance is critical to federal government contractors, especially those that work with the Department of Defense, as well as how leveraging PIV-I credentialing with multifactor authentication can be used as a defense against cyberattacks

  • Toward A More Innovative Government

    This research study aims to understand how state and local leaders regard their agency’s innovation efforts and what they are doing to overcome the challenges they face in successfully implementing these efforts.

  • From Volume to Value: UK’s NHS Digital Provides U.S. Healthcare Agencies A Roadmap For Value-Based Payment Models

    The U.S. healthcare industry is rapidly moving away from traditional fee-for-service models and towards value-based purchasing that reimburses physicians for quality of care in place of frequency of care.

  • GBC Flash Poll: Is Your Agency Safe?

    Federal leaders weigh in on the state of information security


When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.