GOP confident on FAA bill, but privatization issues unresolved
- By Zach Patton
- October 20, 2003
- Comments
One GOP source said reauthorization is "very imminent" and conferees would not need another CR to continue the FAA negotiations. He acknowledged that some aspects of the conference bill, particularly the provision allowing partial privatization of the air traffic control workforce, may need to be "modified" in order to secure enough votes for approval.
Democrats, however, said conferees will have to do much more than that to pass a reauthorization bill before the end of the month. Several Democrats, including Sen. Frank Lautenberg of New Jersey, have said they will not approve reauthorization unless conferees reinsert the original language-included in the reauthorization bills passed by the House and Senate-expressly prohibiting any air traffic control privatization.
Lautenberg said today that the Bush administration's insistence on including the conference bill's privatization language is forcing Republicans to make deals they are unhappy with, simply to secure enough votes for passage.
"Hardliners in the White House have really put Republican leaders in a bad position, holding up the FAA legislation over politics and corporate favors," Lautenberg contended. "And I certainly don't think anybody wants practical decisions concerning the safety of the flying public in the hands of ideologues in the White House."
One House Democratic source familiar with the FAA conference said she is not confident that Congress can pass the reauthorization bill in the next two weeks, and that Republicans would have already brought the bill to a vote if they had enough votes for passage.
"It would be great if we could do this without another CR," the source said, but she added that a broadly supported bipartisan bill would have to include the original anti-privatization provision. "Republicans hold the cards here; no one's holding this up but them," she said.
By using this service you agree not to post material that is obscene, harassing, defamatory, or otherwise objectionable. Although GovExec.com does not monitor comments posted to this site (and has no obligation to), it reserves the right to delete, edit, or move any material that it deems to be in violation of this rule.
Agriculture Close To Avoiding Furloughs
Feds Respond to Oklahoma Tornadoes
Making Government 'Simpler'
OK Senators Leery of Unfunded Tornado Relief
Boldly Go Where No Fed's Gone Before
Cutting costs: Inside the effort to improve the efficiency of federal operations
Sponsored
3 Ways Data is Improving DoD Performance
Research Report: Powering Continuous Monitoring Through Big Data
Need to Know Memo: Big Data
