Civilian agencies denounce new job competition deadlines

The Bush administration's overhaul of federal outsourcing rules is drawing fire from civilian agencies that believe it sets unrealistic time frames and could sap resources from other White House management initiatives.

A review of comments from 10 agencies on the new process shows considerable opposition to new competition deadlines and a requirement that most Inter-Service Support Agreements (ISSAs)-pacts in which agencies provide support services to each other-face private competition. But most agencies did not take issue with a new competition process included in the rules-the "best value" method.

The Office of Management and Budget unveiled the new rules on Nov. 14 in OMB Circular A-76 and accepted public comments until Dec. 19.

The Justice, Transportation, Interior, Veterans Affairs and Health and Human Services departments and the General Services Administration all protested the new deadlines. The new circular sets a 12-month deadline for full job competitions and limits the time for smaller studies, known as business case analyses, to 15 days or less.

"The 12-month timeframe is…too short a time to complete most competitions," said Paul Corts, assistant attorney general for administration at the Justice Department. The General Services Administration urged OMB to extend the deadline to 24 months.

The comments indicate a widespread concern by agencies that they lack the resources to implement the provisions of the new circular, which also includes new requirements for complying with the 1998 Federal Activities Inventory Reform Act. The Transportation Department said a requirement to hold recurring competitions every three to five years could hinder workforce planning at the agency. And GSA said the new process could impede its ability to comply with other areas of the president's five-part management agenda.

"GSA is concerned that an overly restrictive Circular A-76…could adversely affect our ability to maintain our level of productivity in other presidential management objectives such as human capital initiatives," said Associate Administrator Boyd Rutherford in GSA's comments.

Several agencies also protested OMB's new presumption that all federal jobs are "commercial" in nature until proven otherwise, which they said is contrary to the will of Congress. The Small Business Administration criticized revisions to the definition of "inherently governmental" work, which it said could allow contractors to supervise federal employees.

In particularly strong criticism, SBA also claimed the new competition process favors private contractors and could hurt recruitment efforts across government. "The actual duration of 'permanent' federal employment will become so uncertain that people may be reluctant to apply for government jobs," said the agency.

Additionally, agencies were critical of the requirement to compete all ISSAs, which would give private firms access to the multibillion dollar federal market for support services. OMB proposed full ISSA competitions in the last revision of Circular A-76, in 1996, but withdrew the proposal in the face of agency opposition.

OMB did not respond to a request to comment on this article. Office of Federal Procurement Policy Administrator Angela Styles has promised to review every comment and to consider suggestions for revising the new circular.

Agency comments were made available by OMB or obtained by Government Executive. OMB plans to post all agency comments on its Web site later this week.

Stay up-to-date with federal news alerts and analysis — Sign up for GovExec's email newsletters.
Close [ x ] More from GovExec

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from
We think these reports might interest you:

  • Sponsored by G Suite

    Cross-Agency Teamwork, Anytime and Anywhere

    Dan McCrae, director of IT service delivery division, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA)

  • Data-Centric Security vs. Database-Level Security

    Database-level encryption had its origins in the 1990s and early 2000s in response to very basic risks which largely revolved around the theft of servers, backup tapes and other physical-layer assets. As noted in Verizon’s 2014, Data Breach Investigations Report (DBIR)1, threats today are far more advanced and dangerous.

  • Sponsored by One Identity

    One Nation Under Guard: Securing User Identities Across State and Local Government

    In 2016, the government can expect even more sophisticated threats on the horizon, making it all the more imperative that agencies enforce proper identity and access management (IAM) practices. In order to better measure the current state of IAM at the state and local level, Government Business Council (GBC) conducted an in-depth research study of state and local employees.

  • Sponsored by Aquilent

    The Next Federal Evolution of Cloud

    This GBC report explains the evolution of cloud computing in federal government, and provides an outlook for the future of the cloud in government IT.

  • Sponsored by LTC Partners, administrators of the Federal Long Term Care Insurance Program

    Approaching the Brink of Federal Retirement

    Approximately 10,000 baby boomers are reaching retirement age per day, and a growing number of federal employees are preparing themselves for the next chapter of their lives. Learn how to tackle the challenges that today's workforce faces in laying the groundwork for a smooth and secure retirement.

  • Sponsored by Hewlett Packard Enterprise

    Cyber Defense 101: Arming the Next Generation of Government Employees

    Read this issue brief to learn about the sector's most potent challenges in the new cyber landscape and how government organizations are building a robust, threat-aware infrastructure

  • Sponsored by Aquilent

    GBC Issue Brief: Cultivating Digital Services in the Federal Landscape

    Read this GBC issue brief to learn more about the current state of digital services in the government, and how key players are pushing enhancements towards a user-centric approach.


When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.