Panel approves pay raise, rejects OMB job competition plan

A Senate Appropriations subcommittee voted Thursday to give federal employees a 4.1 percent pay raise in fiscal 2003, after the House Appropriations Committee approved a similar hike Tuesday. The Senate Appropriations Subcommittee on the Treasury Department, Postal Service, and General Government Operations also voted to keep federal agencies from targeting a set number of federal jobs for possible outsourcing, a move that could bring the Bush administration's competitive sourcing initiative to a halt.

The outsourcing provision would prevent agencies from meeting an Office of Management and Budget target for competing federal jobs with private firms. OMB has told agencies to compete or outsource 15 percent of their commercial jobs by October 2003, although it has said that some agencies may fall short of this target. But Friday, White House Budget Director Mitch Daniels said officials would recommend that President Bush veto any legislation that curtails the competitive sourcing initiative. "We get better services through competition," said Daniels at a White House briefing on the mid-session budget review. "We are doing too much cutting of our own grass and doing of the laundry [in government]." Sens. Byron Dorgan, D-N.D., and Barbara Mikulski, D-Md., sponsored the amendment, which passed by a 4-3 vote. The full Senate Appropriations Committee is scheduled to take up the bill on Tuesday. The amendment is identical to one offered by Rep. James Moran, D-Va., on Tuesday and the latest in a series of legislative efforts to derail OMB's competitive sourcing initiative, the most controversial part of President Bush's management agenda. The Dorgan amendment is the first such provision to be added to a bill. While the provision would prevent the White House from holding agencies to numerical targets, the administration could find other ways to encourage competitive sourcing--such as withholding funds from agencies that do not hold job competitions. As long as they did not follow a set target, agencies could also continue to contract-out work on their own under the measure. Federal unions, which have long opposed OMB's job competition targets, said the subcommittee's move would help agencies concentrate on their mission, instead of spending time on public-private job competitions. "We're very pleased," said John Threlkeld, a policy analyst with the American Federation of Government Employees. "It obviously doesn't address all our concerns about contracting-out but it would certainly be a significant improvement over the status quo." Colleen Kelley, president of the National Treasury Employees Union, said the provision would keep civilian agencies from directly outsourcing federal jobs to the private sector. "Because most civilian agencies have virtually no experience in conducting a fair public-private competition, in order to meet the OMB quotas, they have no choice but to contract out the federal employee jobs without competition." But a spokesman for a contractor association said the amendment needlessly interferes with the White House government reform agenda. "The president's management agenda sets for the first time reachable and realistic goals for competitive sourcing," said George Sigalos, spokesman for the Contract Services Association. "Without those goals there is absolutely no mandate for government to reform itself in all of the areas that it needs to do so."

Matthew Weinstock contributed to this story.

Stay up-to-date with federal news alerts and analysis — Sign up for GovExec's email newsletters.
Close [ x ] More from GovExec

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from
We think these reports might interest you:

  • Sponsored by G Suite

    Cross-Agency Teamwork, Anytime and Anywhere

    Dan McCrae, director of IT service delivery division, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA)

  • Data-Centric Security vs. Database-Level Security

    Database-level encryption had its origins in the 1990s and early 2000s in response to very basic risks which largely revolved around the theft of servers, backup tapes and other physical-layer assets. As noted in Verizon’s 2014, Data Breach Investigations Report (DBIR)1, threats today are far more advanced and dangerous.

  • Sponsored by One Identity

    One Nation Under Guard: Securing User Identities Across State and Local Government

    In 2016, the government can expect even more sophisticated threats on the horizon, making it all the more imperative that agencies enforce proper identity and access management (IAM) practices. In order to better measure the current state of IAM at the state and local level, Government Business Council (GBC) conducted an in-depth research study of state and local employees.

  • Sponsored by Aquilent

    The Next Federal Evolution of Cloud

    This GBC report explains the evolution of cloud computing in federal government, and provides an outlook for the future of the cloud in government IT.

  • Sponsored by LTC Partners, administrators of the Federal Long Term Care Insurance Program

    Approaching the Brink of Federal Retirement

    Approximately 10,000 baby boomers are reaching retirement age per day, and a growing number of federal employees are preparing themselves for the next chapter of their lives. Learn how to tackle the challenges that today's workforce faces in laying the groundwork for a smooth and secure retirement.

  • Sponsored by Hewlett Packard Enterprise

    Cyber Defense 101: Arming the Next Generation of Government Employees

    Read this issue brief to learn about the sector's most potent challenges in the new cyber landscape and how government organizations are building a robust, threat-aware infrastructure

  • Sponsored by Aquilent

    GBC Issue Brief: Cultivating Digital Services in the Federal Landscape

    Read this GBC issue brief to learn more about the current state of digital services in the government, and how key players are pushing enhancements towards a user-centric approach.


When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.