GSA suspends Enron and Andersen from new business

The General Services Administration Friday temporarily suspended Enron Corp. and the auditing firm Arthur Andersen from doing future business with the federal government.

GSA suspended Enron for one year from receiving government contracts, while Andersen's suspension lasts for the duration of its criminal indictment. The agency announced its decision a day after federal prosecutors indicted Andersen for alleged obstruction of justice, including shredding documents related to the Enron investigation.

Enron and Andersen officials have engaged in activities that "seriously impact their suitability to receive government contracts," according to a GSA statement. "A contractor that does not have adequate internal controls cannot provide such assurances to the government, and should not receive government contracts."

The suspension applies only to future government business and does not affect existing contracts between agencies and the two companies. Ten agencies, including GSA and the Justice Department, had almost $60 million in contracts with one or both of the companies as of the third quarter of fiscal 2001.

The government can suspend or debar contractors for misconduct and mismanagement. Suspension is temporary, while debarment is for "a reasonable period," according to the Federal Acquisition Regulation. Contractors can be debarred for activities such as fraud, embezzlement and forgery.

Existing contracts are not automatically terminated if a suspension or proposed debarment notice is issued. Contractors that receive a federal notice of suspension or proposed debarment can defend themselves in writing or in person within 30 days.

In January, the Office of Management and Budget directed GSA to review 106 existing contracts with Enron and Andersen and, if necessary, begin suspension or debarment proceedings against the two companies.

"GSA is continuing the review of Andersen and Enron officials to determine whether their business practices meet the standards required to do business with the government in the future," Raymond J. McKenna, GSA's general counsel, said Friday. "At this time, it is inappropriate to comment further about this continuing review."

The General Accounting Office released new rules in January designed to make sure auditors who review federal agencies do not perform management functions or make management decisions. The rules expressly prohibit auditing organizations from providing bookkeeping, recordkeeping and payroll services, although auditors can continue to provide routine advice and answer technical questions.

In December, the Bush administration overturned a controversial Clinton-era regulation requiring government contractors to meet strict ethical standards. The repealed regulations required government contracting officers to review a firm's compliance with labor, employment, tax, environmental and antitrust laws before awarding a federal contract.

The business community had argued that the regulation would lead to a "blacklist" of companies banned from government contracts, even if the companies resolved concerns over labor, environmental and other issues. They also argued that the rules were unnecessary since the FAR already includes a provision on contractor ethics. The existing provision in the FAR still requires contracting officers to determine whether a potential contractor is "responsible," but it does not force officers to research the legal practices of companies.

Stay up-to-date with federal news alerts and analysis — Sign up for GovExec's email newsletters.
FROM OUR SPONSORS
JOIN THE DISCUSSION
Close [ x ] More from GovExec
 
 

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from GovExec.com.
We think these reports might interest you:

  • Sponsored by G Suite

    Cross-Agency Teamwork, Anytime and Anywhere

    Dan McCrae, director of IT service delivery division, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA)

    Download
  • Data-Centric Security vs. Database-Level Security

    Database-level encryption had its origins in the 1990s and early 2000s in response to very basic risks which largely revolved around the theft of servers, backup tapes and other physical-layer assets. As noted in Verizon’s 2014, Data Breach Investigations Report (DBIR)1, threats today are far more advanced and dangerous.

    Download
  • Federal IT Applications: Assessing Government's Core Drivers

    In order to better understand the current state of external and internal-facing agency workplace applications, Government Business Council (GBC) and Riverbed undertook an in-depth research study of federal employees. Overall, survey findings indicate that federal IT applications still face a gamut of challenges with regard to quality, reliability, and performance management.

    Download
  • PIV- I And Multifactor Authentication: The Best Defense for Federal Government Contractors

    This white paper explores NIST SP 800-171 and why compliance is critical to federal government contractors, especially those that work with the Department of Defense, as well as how leveraging PIV-I credentialing with multifactor authentication can be used as a defense against cyberattacks

    Download
  • Toward A More Innovative Government

    This research study aims to understand how state and local leaders regard their agency’s innovation efforts and what they are doing to overcome the challenges they face in successfully implementing these efforts.

    Download
  • From Volume to Value: UK’s NHS Digital Provides U.S. Healthcare Agencies A Roadmap For Value-Based Payment Models

    The U.S. healthcare industry is rapidly moving away from traditional fee-for-service models and towards value-based purchasing that reimburses physicians for quality of care in place of frequency of care.

    Download
  • GBC Flash Poll: Is Your Agency Safe?

    Federal leaders weigh in on the state of information security

    Download

When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.