Congress reaches deal on military base closings

Congress will likely approve military base closings in 2005 and, for the first time, require that some Energy Department facilities be reviewed for shuttering, according to congressional and industry sources. The House and Senate have been deadlocked in recent weeks over closing military bases. The Senate narrowly approved closing military bases in 2004 as part of its version of the 2002 Defense authorization bill, but the House rejected a similar proposal in its budget. After weeks of stalled conference negotiations, lawmakers have forged a compromise in recent days that could be approved by both legislative bodies by the end of this week. Like previous base closure rounds in 1988, 1990, 1991, 1993 and 1995, the proposal would require lawmakers to appoint a nine-member independent commission to come up with lists of bases to close that would then be either approved or rejected by the President and Congress in its entirety. More specifically, the new proposal would:
  • Permit one round of base closures beginning in 2005.
  • Require any Energy Department facilities that fall under the national security budget to be reviewed for closing. A base closure commission has never before reviewed Energy facilities.
  • Require seven of nine commission members to support closing a base if the Secretary of Defense does not support the decision. Previously, base commissions only required a simple majority to close a base over Pentagon opposition.
"There are off ramps and protections against a runaway commission so that people will think if you have to do BRAC, this is a better process than before," said a congressional source. An industry source, who backed the Senate proposal to close bases in 2004, said the proposal was better than not having base closures at all, but added that Congress was only wasting money by delaying it for a year. The Pentagon has said closing additional bases could save as much as $3 billion annually and has urged the White House to reject any Defense budget that does not permit base closings.
Stay up-to-date with federal news alerts and analysis — Sign up for GovExec's email newsletters.
Close [ x ] More from GovExec

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from
We think these reports might interest you:

  • Sponsored by G Suite

    Cross-Agency Teamwork, Anytime and Anywhere

    Dan McCrae, director of IT service delivery division, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA)

  • Data-Centric Security vs. Database-Level Security

    Database-level encryption had its origins in the 1990s and early 2000s in response to very basic risks which largely revolved around the theft of servers, backup tapes and other physical-layer assets. As noted in Verizon’s 2014, Data Breach Investigations Report (DBIR)1, threats today are far more advanced and dangerous.

  • Federal IT Applications: Assessing Government's Core Drivers

    In order to better understand the current state of external and internal-facing agency workplace applications, Government Business Council (GBC) and Riverbed undertook an in-depth research study of federal employees. Overall, survey findings indicate that federal IT applications still face a gamut of challenges with regard to quality, reliability, and performance management.

  • PIV- I And Multifactor Authentication: The Best Defense for Federal Government Contractors

    This white paper explores NIST SP 800-171 and why compliance is critical to federal government contractors, especially those that work with the Department of Defense, as well as how leveraging PIV-I credentialing with multifactor authentication can be used as a defense against cyberattacks

  • Toward A More Innovative Government

    This research study aims to understand how state and local leaders regard their agency’s innovation efforts and what they are doing to overcome the challenges they face in successfully implementing these efforts.

  • From Volume to Value: UK’s NHS Digital Provides U.S. Healthcare Agencies A Roadmap For Value-Based Payment Models

    The U.S. healthcare industry is rapidly moving away from traditional fee-for-service models and towards value-based purchasing that reimburses physicians for quality of care in place of frequency of care.

  • GBC Flash Poll: Is Your Agency Safe?

    Federal leaders weigh in on the state of information security


When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.