Contractors vow to fight measure requiring Pentagon job competitions

The Pentagon would be buried in red tape if federal employees were allowed to compete for thousands of jobs currently held by Defense contractors, according to the president of a leading contractors' association. The competition measure, part of the Defense Authorization Bill (H.R. 2586), would force the Pentagon to subject equal numbers of government and contractor jobs to public-private job competitions each year. This means the Pentagon would have to find public employees to compete against the private sector incumbent--a difficult chore since agencies usually stop performing functions that are outsourced, Gary Engebretson, president of the Contract Services Association (CSA), said in a recent interview with "The employees that would have been available to put together the [in-house team] are gone. So [Pentagon officials] are going to have to go out and gather people from some other locations, or go out and hire people," said Engebretson. The sponsor of the competition provision blasted this argument. "Did he say that with a straight face?" asked Rep. Neil Abercrombie, D-Hawaii. "So these private sector jobs are so esoteric that there is no equivalent in the federal civil service? Those people in the Defense Finance Accounting Service don't do accounting?" Engebretson and contractors were surprised when the House Armed Services Committee approved Abercrombie's amendment by a 34-25 vote last month. In their view, Abercrombie's provision resembles the union-backed Truthfulness, Responsibility and Accountability in Contracting (TRAC) Act, which would also force agencies to let public employees compete for private sector work. Since Abercrombie's amendment was rushed to the floor during mark-up, some members of the committee did not know the details of the proposal when they voted for it, according to Engebretson. As a result, the committee voted for the measure based on sympathy for Abercrombie, Engebretson said. "As Abercrombie cried on the table that he made his presentation on, they all got so sympathetic they voted for it," said Engebretson. Abercrombie said that explanation was an insult to the committee members. "I don't know about [Engebretson], but I've taken thousands of votes in my legislative lifetime, and I'm particularly aware that amendments have implications beyond raising your hand," he said. Engebretson and his staff have been meeting with lawmakers to help raise opposition to Abercrombie's provision. Engebretson believes the provision should be stripped from the Defense bill when it is introduced before the full House. If the measure passes the House, CSA will fight similar provisions in the Senate and in conference, he said. But Abercrombie vowed to fight any attempts to scuttle his provision on the House floor. "If they think I did a job on them in committee, wait till I get to the floor," he said.
Stay up-to-date with federal news alerts and analysis — Sign up for GovExec's email newsletters.
Close [ x ] More from GovExec

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from
We think these reports might interest you:

  • Sponsored by G Suite

    Cross-Agency Teamwork, Anytime and Anywhere

    Dan McCrae, director of IT service delivery division, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA)

  • Data-Centric Security vs. Database-Level Security

    Database-level encryption had its origins in the 1990s and early 2000s in response to very basic risks which largely revolved around the theft of servers, backup tapes and other physical-layer assets. As noted in Verizon’s 2014, Data Breach Investigations Report (DBIR)1, threats today are far more advanced and dangerous.

  • Sponsored by One Identity

    One Nation Under Guard: Securing User Identities Across State and Local Government

    In 2016, the government can expect even more sophisticated threats on the horizon, making it all the more imperative that agencies enforce proper identity and access management (IAM) practices. In order to better measure the current state of IAM at the state and local level, Government Business Council (GBC) conducted an in-depth research study of state and local employees.

  • Sponsored by Aquilent

    The Next Federal Evolution of Cloud

    This GBC report explains the evolution of cloud computing in federal government, and provides an outlook for the future of the cloud in government IT.

  • Sponsored by LTC Partners, administrators of the Federal Long Term Care Insurance Program

    Approaching the Brink of Federal Retirement

    Approximately 10,000 baby boomers are reaching retirement age per day, and a growing number of federal employees are preparing themselves for the next chapter of their lives. Learn how to tackle the challenges that today's workforce faces in laying the groundwork for a smooth and secure retirement.

  • Sponsored by Hewlett Packard Enterprise

    Cyber Defense 101: Arming the Next Generation of Government Employees

    Read this issue brief to learn about the sector's most potent challenges in the new cyber landscape and how government organizations are building a robust, threat-aware infrastructure

  • Sponsored by Aquilent

    GBC Issue Brief: Cultivating Digital Services in the Federal Landscape

    Read this GBC issue brief to learn more about the current state of digital services in the government, and how key players are pushing enhancements towards a user-centric approach.


When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.