Pentagon to seek single round of base closures

The Bush administration will seek a single round of military base closures in 2003 after a comprehensive review of all Defense Department installations, Pete Aldridge, undersecretary of Defense for acquisition, technology and logistics announced Thursday. Aldridge unveiled the Defense Department's new base closing proposal, dubbed the Efficient Facilities Initiative of 2001, at a Pentagon news conference. The proposal, which modifies the Defense Base Closure and Realignment Act of 1990, will be submitted to Congress Friday. The new round of base closures is needed because the Pentagon has a 20 percent to 25 percent excess base capacity that is draining funds from modernization projects, Aldridge said. "We have got too much infrastructure," said Aldridge. "We need to go address it." The Pentagon has not decided how many bases to close and has no estimate of the number of federal jobs that could be affected, according to Aldridge. "We have not started the analysis, despite what some people believe," he said. The Pentagon proposal retains the independent Base Realignment and Closure (BRAC) commission, a hallmark of previous base-closing rounds, but also expands the power of the Defense Secretary to select installations for closure. The initiative calls for the Pentagon to submit a list of proposed base closures to the independent commission by March 14, 2003. Unlike previous BRAC rounds, all decisions must be based on "military value," a criterion that includes factors such as savings gained from the elimination of facilities and the potential need for future remobilization. The commission may only take bases off this list if it finds the Defense Secretary strayed from this selection criterion, and then must provide the Secretary with an opportunity to testify about any proposed changes. The Pentagon initiative also allows the Secretary to veto any attempt by the commission to nominate additional bases for closure. Despite these restrictions, Aldridge maintained that the commission has wide power to modify the Pentagon's recommendations. "The commission can do anything it wants to," he said. "It is an independent commission." The commission must send its recommendations to President Bush by July 7, 2003. The President and Congress would then be required to reject or accept these recommendations without making any changes. In a nod to congressional lawmakers, the Pentagon proposal allows the chairmen and ranking members of the Defense committees--in addition to the top leaders of the House and Senate--to consult with the administration on the makeup of the commission. The legislation will also call for the commission to have nine members, rather than eight, to prevent tie votes. The Bush administration settled on one round of base closures to ease the strain on local communities, according to Aldridge. "We don't want to put local communities through this torture twice," said Aldridge. "It's unpleasant enough to go through this once." The administration decided against exempting certain bases from the base closure review to uphold the fairness of the process, Aldridge added. "[It] would really politicize the process, because everyone would be clamoring to get on that list," he said. Rep. Vic Snyder, D-Ark., has introduced legislation (H.R. 1820) that would fence off "core" military bases from closure for national security reasons. Aldridge acknowledged the base closure bill would face some hurdles in Congress, where lawmakers have resisted additional BRAC rounds in recent years. "It's going to be a tough sell," he said. "Some people are very much against this process, while some people are very much for the process."
Stay up-to-date with federal news alerts and analysis — Sign up for GovExec's email newsletters.
Close [ x ] More from GovExec

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from
We think these reports might interest you:

  • Sponsored by G Suite

    Cross-Agency Teamwork, Anytime and Anywhere

    Dan McCrae, director of IT service delivery division, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA)

  • Data-Centric Security vs. Database-Level Security

    Database-level encryption had its origins in the 1990s and early 2000s in response to very basic risks which largely revolved around the theft of servers, backup tapes and other physical-layer assets. As noted in Verizon’s 2014, Data Breach Investigations Report (DBIR)1, threats today are far more advanced and dangerous.

  • Sponsored by One Identity

    One Nation Under Guard: Securing User Identities Across State and Local Government

    In 2016, the government can expect even more sophisticated threats on the horizon, making it all the more imperative that agencies enforce proper identity and access management (IAM) practices. In order to better measure the current state of IAM at the state and local level, Government Business Council (GBC) conducted an in-depth research study of state and local employees.

  • Sponsored by Aquilent

    The Next Federal Evolution of Cloud

    This GBC report explains the evolution of cloud computing in federal government, and provides an outlook for the future of the cloud in government IT.

  • Sponsored by LTC Partners, administrators of the Federal Long Term Care Insurance Program

    Approaching the Brink of Federal Retirement

    Approximately 10,000 baby boomers are reaching retirement age per day, and a growing number of federal employees are preparing themselves for the next chapter of their lives. Learn how to tackle the challenges that today's workforce faces in laying the groundwork for a smooth and secure retirement.

  • Sponsored by Hewlett Packard Enterprise

    Cyber Defense 101: Arming the Next Generation of Government Employees

    Read this issue brief to learn about the sector's most potent challenges in the new cyber landscape and how government organizations are building a robust, threat-aware infrastructure

  • Sponsored by Aquilent

    GBC Issue Brief: Cultivating Digital Services in the Federal Landscape

    Read this GBC issue brief to learn more about the current state of digital services in the government, and how key players are pushing enhancements towards a user-centric approach.


When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.