GAO dismisses protest over government long-distance contract

The General Accounting Office last week denied a bid protest by Qwest Communications Inc. over a contract awarded to AT&T for the government's long-distance phone service. In December 2000, the General Services Administration issued a one-time payment of $8 million to AT&T to continue long-distance service under the FTS 2000 contract. Qwest immediately filed a protest with GSA, charging that contract was awarded unfairly because it was not competed. The bridge contract allows AT&T to provide long-distance service while agencies switch from FTS 2000 to FTS 2001. FTS 2000 is the predecessor to FTS 2001, awarded in December 1998 and January 1999 to Sprint and MCI WorldCom, respectively. AT&T claimed the $8 million was required to keep its long-distance network up and running to serve federal customers during the transition to the new contract. But Al Olson, assistant commissioner of GSA's office of acquisition, said that officials from AT&T told him that if the company wasn't paid, it would cut off the government's phones. A Qwest senior executive balked at the AT&T bridge contract. "It was blackmail," said Jim Payne, vice president of Qwest's government systems division. Payne said GSA's willingness to pay an amount that other industry experts say is exorbitant "reveals an incredible naïveté" on the part of the agency and its ability to successfully negotiate the $11 billion FTS 2001, one of the largest non-defense contracts in history. Agencies were supposed to make a transition from FTS 2000 to FTS 2001 by Dec. 2000, but the process is more than a year behind schedule and has cost the government $74 million in lost savings, according to a March GAO report. AT&T's bridge contract expires this December, and GSA has said it will not renew it. Testifying before the House Subcommittee on Technology and Procurement Policy in April, John Doherty, vice president of AT&T government markets, said the government's payment would have been higher had AT&T charged the total cost it incurred maintaining the system. "We looked at the balance of upsetting the agencies and their budgets, etc., so the number was much lower than it would have been," Doherty said. GSA dismissed Qwest's protest last March. The company re-filed with GAO, which Thursday dismissed the protest again, finding that Qwest couldn't provide long-distance service in all 50 states as required by FTS 2001. Qwest is classified as a Bell Operating Company due to its acquisition of US West last year and is prohibited from providing long distance in 14 states. Agencies can now buy long-distance and data services under FTS 2001 at drastically reduced rates-an average of 3 cents per minute for long distance, according to GSA. GAO reports that agencies still operating with AT&T under the FTS 2000 bridge contract risk seeing their long distance rates shoot up to $1.00 per minute or more by year's end. For more than two years, GSA has urged all agencies still using AT&T for long distance to switch to FTS 2001 providers. Sandra Bates, commissioner of GSA's Federal Technology Service, which manages the contract, said the transition is 99 percent complete. AT&T did not return calls to comment on GAO's decision.
Stay up-to-date with federal news alerts and analysis — Sign up for GovExec's email newsletters.
Close [ x ] More from GovExec

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from
We think these reports might interest you:

  • Sponsored by G Suite

    Cross-Agency Teamwork, Anytime and Anywhere

    Dan McCrae, director of IT service delivery division, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA)

  • Data-Centric Security vs. Database-Level Security

    Database-level encryption had its origins in the 1990s and early 2000s in response to very basic risks which largely revolved around the theft of servers, backup tapes and other physical-layer assets. As noted in Verizon’s 2014, Data Breach Investigations Report (DBIR)1, threats today are far more advanced and dangerous.

  • Sponsored by One Identity

    One Nation Under Guard: Securing User Identities Across State and Local Government

    In 2016, the government can expect even more sophisticated threats on the horizon, making it all the more imperative that agencies enforce proper identity and access management (IAM) practices. In order to better measure the current state of IAM at the state and local level, Government Business Council (GBC) conducted an in-depth research study of state and local employees.

  • Sponsored by Aquilent

    The Next Federal Evolution of Cloud

    This GBC report explains the evolution of cloud computing in federal government, and provides an outlook for the future of the cloud in government IT.

  • Sponsored by LTC Partners, administrators of the Federal Long Term Care Insurance Program

    Approaching the Brink of Federal Retirement

    Approximately 10,000 baby boomers are reaching retirement age per day, and a growing number of federal employees are preparing themselves for the next chapter of their lives. Learn how to tackle the challenges that today's workforce faces in laying the groundwork for a smooth and secure retirement.

  • Sponsored by Hewlett Packard Enterprise

    Cyber Defense 101: Arming the Next Generation of Government Employees

    Read this issue brief to learn about the sector's most potent challenges in the new cyber landscape and how government organizations are building a robust, threat-aware infrastructure

  • Sponsored by Aquilent

    GBC Issue Brief: Cultivating Digital Services in the Federal Landscape

    Read this GBC issue brief to learn more about the current state of digital services in the government, and how key players are pushing enhancements towards a user-centric approach.


When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.