Air Force loses bid protest at Alabama base due to A-76 violations

The Air Force lost a bid protest involving base operations work at Maxwell Air Force Base, Ala., because it violated the government's public-private competition rules, according to the General Accounting Office. In a July 17 decision, the GAO reversed an Air Force decision and recommended that the service award a $198 million, five-year contract to DynCorp Technical Services, a Virginia-based contractor. If the Air Force accepts the GAO's decision, 402 civilian jobs at Maxwell will be eliminated, although workers are likely to have the right of first refusal to work for DynCorp. GAO found two problems with the competition that skewed the cost comparison against DynCorp. First, the in-house group subtracted the costs of existing government materials from its total cost estimate for materials, while DynCorp did not. This shaved $1.3 million off the in-house bid. Since either winner of the competition would have access to the materials, they represent a "common item" that must be subtracted from both proposals, according to the GAO. "The value of the government-furnished material, which would be provided to either the successful private-sector offeror or the [in-house group], is a common cost item that should have been deducted from both sides," said the GAO. The Air Force also neglected a performance strength in DynCorp's proposal that should have been factored into the final decision, GAO said. DynCorp offered to begin work 30 days earlier than the Air Force required. While this strength helped DynCorp win the phase of the competition in which private firms compete against one another for a chance to compete against the government, the Air Force did not consider it in the public-private competition. The Air Force considered this strength immaterial because both DynCorp and the in-house team received the same ratings on mobilization, meaning they offered the same level of performance. But this rationale means DynCorp was held to a higher performance standard than the in-house group, according to the GAO. "A generalized comparison of quality, as offered by the Air Force here, cannot substitute for the consideration…of whether the in-house plan offers a level of performance comparable to that of the selected private-sector proposal," said GAO. The Pentagon is crafting guidance to help clarify how personnel should factor performance strengths into contests such as the Maxwell competition. Defense will require performance work statements to be amended to include performance standards of the private sector firm that are relevant to the competition, according to a copy of the draft guidance obtained by GovExec.com.
Stay up-to-date with federal news alerts and analysis — Sign up for GovExec's email newsletters.
FROM OUR SPONSORS
JOIN THE DISCUSSION
Close [ x ] More from GovExec
 
 

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from GovExec.com.
We think these reports might interest you:

  • Sponsored by Brocade

    Best of 2016 Federal Forum eBook

    Earlier this summer, Federal and tech industry leaders convened to talk security, machine learning, network modernization, DevOps, and much more at the 2016 Federal Forum. This eBook includes a useful summary highlighting the best content shared at the 2016 Federal Forum to help agencies modernize their network infrastructure.

    Download
  • Sponsored by CDW-G

    GBC Flash Poll Series: Merger & Acquisitions

    Download this GBC Flash Poll to learn more about federal perspectives on the impact of industry consolidation.

    Download
  • Sponsored by One Identity

    One Nation Under Guard: Securing User Identities Across State and Local Government

    In 2016, the government can expect even more sophisticated threats on the horizon, making it all the more imperative that agencies enforce proper identity and access management (IAM) practices. In order to better measure the current state of IAM at the state and local level, Government Business Council (GBC) conducted an in-depth research study of state and local employees.

    Download
  • Sponsored by Aquilent

    The Next Federal Evolution of Cloud

    This GBC report explains the evolution of cloud computing in federal government, and provides an outlook for the future of the cloud in government IT.

    Download
  • Sponsored by Aquilent

    A DevOps Roadmap for the Federal Government

    This GBC Report discusses how DevOps is steadily gaining traction among some of government's leading IT developers and agencies.

    Download
  • Sponsored by LTC Partners, administrators of the Federal Long Term Care Insurance Program

    Approaching the Brink of Federal Retirement

    Approximately 10,000 baby boomers are reaching retirement age per day, and a growing number of federal employees are preparing themselves for the next chapter of their lives. Learn how to tackle the challenges that today's workforce faces in laying the groundwork for a smooth and secure retirement.

    Download
  • Sponsored by Hewlett Packard Enterprise

    Cyber Defense 101: Arming the Next Generation of Government Employees

    Read this issue brief to learn about the sector's most potent challenges in the new cyber landscape and how government organizations are building a robust, threat-aware infrastructure

    Download
  • Sponsored by Aquilent

    GBC Issue Brief: Cultivating Digital Services in the Federal Landscape

    Read this GBC issue brief to learn more about the current state of digital services in the government, and how key players are pushing enhancements towards a user-centric approach.

    Download
  • Sponsored by CDW-G

    Joint Enterprise Licensing Agreements

    Read this eBook to learn how defense agencies can achieve savings and efficiencies with an Enterprise Software Agreement.

    Download
  • Sponsored by Cloudera

    Government Forum Content Library

    Get all the essential resources needed for effective technology strategies in the federal landscape.

    Download

When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.