GAO asks Congress to investigate Army inaction in A-76 case

Congress should investigate why the Army has taken more than a year to implement a bid protest decision by the General Accounting Office, GAO General Counsel Anthony Gamboa said last week. While agencies occasionally refuse to follow GAO bid protest decisions, the Army case marks the first time in recent memory that GAO has reported an agency to Congress for delaying compliance, according to Daniel I. Gordon, associate general counsel at GAO. "I am not aware of any case where an agency has delayed implementing a recommendation of ours so long that we reported the matter as a failure to follow our implementation," he said. In a June 19 letter, Gamboa asked for a congressional inquiry into why the Army had yet to follow GAO's recommendations in a bid protest over a public-private competition at Aberdeen Proving Ground in Maryland. Under the 1984 Competition in Contracting Act, GAO is required to report to Congress when an agency does not implement its recommendations. The letter was prompted by the Army's failure to issue a new request for proposals in a public-private competition to perform industrial maintenance work at Aberdeen. In a February 2000 decision, GAO directed the Army to carry out a new competition to remedy flaws in the original contest, which was won by in-house workers. "In view of the lengthy delays in carrying out our recommendation-more than 15 months have passed since we issued our decision-and given the Army's estimate that it will require at least an additional half year to take concrete action in response to our decision, we conclude the Army…has failed to implement the recommendation," wrote Gamboa. GAO ordered a new competition after concluding the Army violated federal rules that dictate how agencies should compare bids from contractors and in-house workers. For example, the Army ignored certain performance strengths in the contractor's bid, meaning the private firm was held to a higher standard than the in-house group. The Army accepted GAO's recommendations for a new competition in July 2000, but the competition has been held up by "unavoidable delays," according to a May letter from the Army quoted by Gamboa.
Stay up-to-date with federal news alerts and analysis — Sign up for GovExec's email newsletters.
Close [ x ] More from GovExec

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from
We think these reports might interest you:

  • Sponsored by G Suite

    Cross-Agency Teamwork, Anytime and Anywhere

    Dan McCrae, director of IT service delivery division, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA)

  • Data-Centric Security vs. Database-Level Security

    Database-level encryption had its origins in the 1990s and early 2000s in response to very basic risks which largely revolved around the theft of servers, backup tapes and other physical-layer assets. As noted in Verizon’s 2014, Data Breach Investigations Report (DBIR)1, threats today are far more advanced and dangerous.

  • Federal IT Applications: Assessing Government's Core Drivers

    In order to better understand the current state of external and internal-facing agency workplace applications, Government Business Council (GBC) and Riverbed undertook an in-depth research study of federal employees. Overall, survey findings indicate that federal IT applications still face a gamut of challenges with regard to quality, reliability, and performance management.

  • PIV- I And Multifactor Authentication: The Best Defense for Federal Government Contractors

    This white paper explores NIST SP 800-171 and why compliance is critical to federal government contractors, especially those that work with the Department of Defense, as well as how leveraging PIV-I credentialing with multifactor authentication can be used as a defense against cyberattacks

  • Toward A More Innovative Government

    This research study aims to understand how state and local leaders regard their agency’s innovation efforts and what they are doing to overcome the challenges they face in successfully implementing these efforts.

  • From Volume to Value: UK’s NHS Digital Provides U.S. Healthcare Agencies A Roadmap For Value-Based Payment Models

    The U.S. healthcare industry is rapidly moving away from traditional fee-for-service models and towards value-based purchasing that reimburses physicians for quality of care in place of frequency of care.

  • GBC Flash Poll: Is Your Agency Safe?

    Federal leaders weigh in on the state of information security


When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.