Competition is the key to outsourcing target, OMB deputy says

Agencies that completely avoid public-private competitions as they aim to meet a Bush administration outsourcing mandate will face scrutiny from the Office of Management and Budget, OMB Deputy Director Sean O'Keefe said Tuesday. In a March 9 memo, O'Keefe directed agencies to compete at least 5 percent of government jobs considered commercial in nature, or 42,500 federal jobs, by October 2002. O'Keefe's memo gives agencies two options for meeting the 5 percent target: direct conversions, in which jobs are converted to the private sector without competition, and public-private competitions. Both options are governed by OMB Circular A-76. Concerned that A-76 competitions are too time-consuming and costly, some civilian agencies are considering direct conversions to comply with OMB's requirement. But agencies shouldn't disregard A-76 competitions when attempting to meet the 5 percent target, said O'Keefe. "I'm very much more an advocate of public-private competition, because it brings out the element of efficiency," O'Keefe said at a management conference sponsored by FPMI Communications. When asked what he would tell agencies that only use direct conversions to meet the 5 percent target, O'Keefe replied, "Let's talk." O'Keefe used his remarks to clarify the purpose of the 5 percent mandate. The Bush administration is not interested in cutting federal jobs, he said, but wants agencies to consider how they can carry out their missions more efficiently. "There is no bias towards privatization or outsourcing," said O'Keefe. "[The 5 percent mandate] is an attempt to get agencies to think about different ways of delivering their services." The 1998 Federal Activities Inventory Reform (FAIR) Act has contributed to the notion that outsourcing and the public-private competition process exist only to shift government work to the private sector, O'Keefe said. The act requires agencies to compile annual lists of all federal functions that are commercial in nature and could be contracted out. "The way the FAIR Act was set up … [functions] are either inside the tent of inherently governmental and protected from competition or part of a competitive free-for-all," said O'Keefe. Agencies should think about how outsourcing can improve their mission instead of dwelling on the classifications of the FAIR Act, he said. "As a management tool, it is better to look at all functions and think about how to perform them in a more efficient way," said O'Keefe. O'Keefe also mentioned that the Bush administration is drafting legislation that will help agencies account for the full cost of their programs, a step that is central to another OMB management initiative, performance budgeting. At present, many agencies are unable to account for the overhead, support and non-direct costs associated with their programs, making it difficult for managers to assess program performance. The legislation will require agencies to account for the benefit costs associated with their programs, O'Keefe said. "The ultimate objective is to reach a full cost accounting system," he said, citing activity-based costing as a tool that can help agencies improve their accounting.
Stay up-to-date with federal news alerts and analysis — Sign up for GovExec's email newsletters.
Close [ x ] More from GovExec

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from
We think these reports might interest you:

  • Forecasting Cloud's Future

    Conversations with Federal, State, and Local Technology Leaders on Cloud-Driven Digital Transformation

  • The Big Data Campaign Trail

    With everyone so focused on security following recent breaches at federal, state and local government and education institutions, there has been little emphasis on the need for better operations. This report breaks down some of the biggest operational challenges in IT management and provides insight into how agencies and leaders can successfully solve some of the biggest lingering government IT issues.

  • Communicating Innovation in Federal Government

    Federal Government spending on ‘obsolete technology’ continues to increase. Supporting the twin pillars of improved digital service delivery for citizens on the one hand, and the increasingly optimized and flexible working practices for federal employees on the other, are neither easy nor inexpensive tasks. This whitepaper explores how federal agencies can leverage the value of existing agency technology assets while offering IT leaders the ability to implement the kind of employee productivity, citizen service improvements and security demanded by federal oversight.

  • IT Transformation Trends: Flash Storage as a Strategic IT Asset

    MIT Technology Review: Flash Storage As a Strategic IT Asset For the first time in decades, IT leaders now consider all-flash storage as a strategic IT asset. IT has become a new operating model that enables self-service with high performance, density and resiliency. It also offers the self-service agility of the public cloud combined with the security, performance, and cost-effectiveness of a private cloud. Download this MIT Technology Review paper to learn more about how all-flash storage is transforming the data center.

  • Ongoing Efforts in Veterans Health Care Modernization

    This report discusses the current state of veterans health care


When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.