Battle breaks out over FAIR Act regulations

Leaders of some of the biggest federal employee unions have joined forces to warn lawmakers against including regulations they say would favor contractors in implementing the Federal Activities Inventory Reform (FAIR) Act.

In a letter sent last week to Jacob Lew, director of the Office of Management and Budget, four union leaders argued that the FAIR act simply codifies an existing detail in OMB Circular A-76 that requires agencies to submit annual inventories of jobs that could be outsourced to the private sector.

"It would be wholly inappropriate for the FAIR Act regulations to go any further and any attempt to do so will be strongly opposed by the public sector community," said the letter, which was signed by American Federation of Government Employees President Bobby L. Harnage, American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees President Gerald McEntee, Service Employees International Union President Andrew Stern and National Treasury Employees Union President Robert Tobias.

In the March 1 Federal Register, OMB proposed regulations for implementing the FAIR act. During the subsequent comment period, contractors have urged OMB to make agencies include more overhead costs in the estimates of how much it would cost for them to keep work in-house. That would drive up agencies' in-house cost estimates in comparison to the cost of outsourcing work.

Contractors also got a helping hand from House Republicans. In a March 8 letter to OMB, about 40 GOP lawmakers asked OMB to make it clear that agencies can directly outsource work without conducting public-private competitions. Unions oppose such instructions, arguing that federal employees have the right to defend their jobs against outsourcing.

The U.S. Chamber of Commerce, which is lobbying OMB on behalf of private contractors, hopes that regulations in the FAIR Act will specify which costs must be included in A-76 comparisons, such as the costs of quality assurance, liability insurance, employee retirement, disability benefits and other overhead costs.

"Many of our members believe that when A-76 cost comparisons are utilized, they do not accurately reflect the government's cost of doing business, and give the federal agencies an unfair advantage," the Chamber's comments on draft implementation of the FAIR Act said.

The union leaders' "comments are unfortunate," said Andrew Fortin, manager of privatization policy at the Chamber of Commerce. "OMB put out some good draft guidance and left the door open for industry and labor to come forward with constructive recommendations. That is just what the Chamber has done."

The scales aren't tipped in favor of contractors, he added. The FAIR Act mandates that agencies submit comprehensive inventories of activities that could be outsourced, that those activities be competed within a reasonable amount of time and that overhead costs be included in the private/federal comparison. Considering that contractors substantially compromised to approve these mandates, "it's ironic that this bill is still cause for alarm for" the unions, he said.

Stay up-to-date with federal news alerts and analysis — Sign up for GovExec's email newsletters.
FROM OUR SPONSORS
JOIN THE DISCUSSION
Close [ x ] More from GovExec
 
 

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from GovExec.com.
We think these reports might interest you:

  • Sponsored by G Suite

    Cross-Agency Teamwork, Anytime and Anywhere

    Dan McCrae, director of IT service delivery division, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA)

    Download
  • Data-Centric Security vs. Database-Level Security

    Database-level encryption had its origins in the 1990s and early 2000s in response to very basic risks which largely revolved around the theft of servers, backup tapes and other physical-layer assets. As noted in Verizon’s 2014, Data Breach Investigations Report (DBIR)1, threats today are far more advanced and dangerous.

    Download
  • Sponsored by One Identity

    One Nation Under Guard: Securing User Identities Across State and Local Government

    In 2016, the government can expect even more sophisticated threats on the horizon, making it all the more imperative that agencies enforce proper identity and access management (IAM) practices. In order to better measure the current state of IAM at the state and local level, Government Business Council (GBC) conducted an in-depth research study of state and local employees.

    Download
  • Sponsored by Aquilent

    The Next Federal Evolution of Cloud

    This GBC report explains the evolution of cloud computing in federal government, and provides an outlook for the future of the cloud in government IT.

    Download
  • Sponsored by LTC Partners, administrators of the Federal Long Term Care Insurance Program

    Approaching the Brink of Federal Retirement

    Approximately 10,000 baby boomers are reaching retirement age per day, and a growing number of federal employees are preparing themselves for the next chapter of their lives. Learn how to tackle the challenges that today's workforce faces in laying the groundwork for a smooth and secure retirement.

    Download
  • Sponsored by Hewlett Packard Enterprise

    Cyber Defense 101: Arming the Next Generation of Government Employees

    Read this issue brief to learn about the sector's most potent challenges in the new cyber landscape and how government organizations are building a robust, threat-aware infrastructure

    Download
  • Sponsored by Aquilent

    GBC Issue Brief: Cultivating Digital Services in the Federal Landscape

    Read this GBC issue brief to learn more about the current state of digital services in the government, and how key players are pushing enhancements towards a user-centric approach.

    Download

When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.