Reforming the Standards

February 1996


Reforming the Standards

DoD works to eliminate military-unique specifications.

Tdhe Defense Department has spent the last two years working to eliminate more than 30,000 military-unique contract specifications-the kind responsible for $300 hammers and 700-page chocolate-chip cookie contracts. A decision was made in 1994 to move to off-the-shelf commercial products and performance-based service standards whenever possible. The migration is expected to save the Pentagon close to $1 billion a year and significantly reduce contract paperwork.

"We need better access to commercial industry because we cannot afford the cost of a separate defense industrial sector, nor the missed opportunities of the technological advances being made every week in commercial industry," Defense Secretary William J. Perry says.

The Pentagon originally intended to move to commercial standards as new contracts were initiated. But after determining the bulk of DoD contracting dollars was in existing contracts-since fewer new weapons systems were being procured-the Defense Department revised its policy and announced in December that it would eliminate unnecessary specifications on existing contracts.

Using what it calls a "block change" modification approach, the Pentagon plans to consolidate or eliminate multiple processes and standards in all contracts on a facilitywide basis, rather than a contract-by-contract basis. So instead of renegotiating the 4,400 contracts it holds with McDonnell Douglas, for instance, DoD plans to ask the company to voluntarily move to commercial standards and performance specifications on all its defense contracts.

The Pentagon acknowledges that contractor transition costs will, in many cases, offset short-term savings. Although DoD will not be picking up the tab for these expenses, it insists the migration will reap big financial rewards in the long term.

"It initially will be difficult for companies because it means a whole new approach to business," says Colleen Preston, deputy undersecretary of Defense for acquisition reform. "They will be bearing a lot more risk because we will no longer be dictating every last detail, but the results will be greater efficiency and easier contract administration."

The problem now is that defense contractors use different specifications and work processes for similar operations. An airplane manufacturer, for instance, might have one set of rules for commercial customers, another set for the Air Force and yet another for the Navy. This leads to increased costs, which then are passed on to DoD.

Stay up-to-date with federal news alerts and analysis — Sign up for GovExec's email newsletters.
Close [ x ] More from GovExec

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from
We think these reports might interest you:

  • Sponsored by G Suite

    Cross-Agency Teamwork, Anytime and Anywhere

    Dan McCrae, director of IT service delivery division, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA)

  • Data-Centric Security vs. Database-Level Security

    Database-level encryption had its origins in the 1990s and early 2000s in response to very basic risks which largely revolved around the theft of servers, backup tapes and other physical-layer assets. As noted in Verizon’s 2014, Data Breach Investigations Report (DBIR)1, threats today are far more advanced and dangerous.

  • Federal IT Applications: Assessing Government's Core Drivers

    In order to better understand the current state of external and internal-facing agency workplace applications, Government Business Council (GBC) and Riverbed undertook an in-depth research study of federal employees. Overall, survey findings indicate that federal IT applications still face a gamut of challenges with regard to quality, reliability, and performance management.

  • PIV- I And Multifactor Authentication: The Best Defense for Federal Government Contractors

    This white paper explores NIST SP 800-171 and why compliance is critical to federal government contractors, especially those that work with the Department of Defense, as well as how leveraging PIV-I credentialing with multifactor authentication can be used as a defense against cyberattacks

  • Toward A More Innovative Government

    This research study aims to understand how state and local leaders regard their agency’s innovation efforts and what they are doing to overcome the challenges they face in successfully implementing these efforts.

  • From Volume to Value: UK’s NHS Digital Provides U.S. Healthcare Agencies A Roadmap For Value-Based Payment Models

    The U.S. healthcare industry is rapidly moving away from traditional fee-for-service models and towards value-based purchasing that reimburses physicians for quality of care in place of frequency of care.

  • GBC Flash Poll: Is Your Agency Safe?

    Federal leaders weigh in on the state of information security


When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.