Vetting Veterans

Advocacy groups fear that disability changes could skew compensation for service-related injuries.

Sweeping veterans disability reforms proposed by President Bush would create a dual compensation system that would be an administrative nightmare for the Veterans Affairs Department and could shortchange certain wounded service members, critics say.

"We need to focus on meeting the needs of veterans, and the VA will adapt to accomplish the task," an agency spokesman said in a statement.

But veterans groups, including the American Legion, Disabled American Veterans, Iraq and Afghanistan Veterans of America, and Veterans of Foreign Wars, oppose the legislation. It would require VA to operate two disability systems-one for veterans of current wars in Iraq and Afghanistan and another for older vets-for as long as 70 years, they say. Those who joined the military after October 2001 would be under the new system.

The groups say the system could compensate Iraq and Afghanistan veterans better because they would receive "quality of life" payments on top of the current formula. Gerard Manar, deputy director of the VFW's national veterans service, says if the dual plan is enshrined in legislation, "you are going to end up with a lot of disgruntled veterans. Vietnam veterans are going to wonder if they are chopped liver."

The President's Commission on Care for America's Returning Wounded Warriors and the Veterans Disability Benefits Commission issued recommendations to the president. But veterans groups are concerned that the administration based its legislation primarily on the work of the Wounded Warriors panel, formed in March and disbanded at the end of July, rather than the Veterans Disability Benefits Commission, in existence since May 2005. That panel conducted hearings across the country and commissioned two studies-one by the Center for Naval Analyses on the benefits determination process and another by the Institute of Medicine examining compensation for Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder.

The legislation would streamline a process that is "difficult to navigate and confusing for both service members and their families" with a new system, which among other things would provide "those unable to serve . . . a pension from the Defense Department based on their rank and length of service," President Bush said on Oct. 16.

But, Manar says, "VA has enough trouble administering the current program, and the creation of two separate and distinct systems could be the death knell of the VA."

The Veterans Affairs Department is swamped with a backlog of 400,000 benefit claims, according to the Senate report on the fiscal 2008 VA-Military Construction spending bill. Manar says two tiers would require the VA to hire thousands of new employees, each of whom would need two to three years of on-the-job training.

Another problem, veterans groups say, is that the plan distinguishes between "combat-related" and training injuries. Manar says the new system could shortchange those who are disabled as the result of an accident on a stateside military base.

But retired Army Lt. Gen. Terry Scott, chairman of the Veterans Disability Benefits Commission, told the Senate Committee on Veterans Affairs on Oct. 17 that "all disabilities and injuries should be compensated based on the severity of disability and not be limited to combat or combat-related injuries."

The two commissions recommended that the VA update its disability rating schedule, last revised 62 years ago, to address mental and neurological disorders such as PTSD and traumatic brain injury. But Todd Bowers, director of government affairs for Iraq and Afghanistan Veterans of America, says he does not see a need to totally revamp the system, since "it is already shaken up with thousands of new veterans" returning from Iraq and Afghanistan. Instead, he says, tweaking the current system could produce better results than starting from scratch.

Stay up-to-date with federal news alerts and analysis — Sign up for GovExec's email newsletters.
FROM OUR SPONSORS
JOIN THE DISCUSSION
Close [ x ] More from GovExec
 
 

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from GovExec.com.
We think these reports might interest you:

  • Going Agile:Revolutionizing Federal Digital Services Delivery

    Here’s one indication that times have changed: Harriet Tubman is going to be the next face of the twenty dollar bill. Another sign of change? The way in which the federal government arrived at that decision.

    View
  • Cyber Risk Report: Cybercrime Trends from 2016

    In our first half 2016 cyber trends report, SurfWatch Labs threat intelligence analysts noted one key theme – the interconnected nature of cybercrime – and the second half of the year saw organizations continuing to struggle with that reality. The number of potential cyber threats, the pool of already compromised information, and the ease of finding increasingly sophisticated cybercriminal tools continued to snowball throughout the year.

    View
  • Featured Content from RSA Conference: Dissed by NIST

    Learn more about the latest draft of the U.S. National Institute of Standards and Technology guidance document on authentication and lifecycle management.

    View
  • GBC Issue Brief: The Future of 9-1-1

    A Look Into the Next Generation of Emergency Services

    View
  • GBC Survey Report: Securing the Perimeters

    A candid survey on cybersecurity in state and local governments

    View
  • The New IP: Moving Government Agencies Toward the Network of The Future

    Federal IT managers are looking to modernize legacy network infrastructures that are taxed by growing demands from mobile devices, video, vast amounts of data, and more. This issue brief discusses the federal government network landscape, as well as market, financial force drivers for network modernization.

    View
  • eBook: State & Local Cybersecurity

    CenturyLink is committed to helping state and local governments meet their cybersecurity challenges. Towards that end, CenturyLink commissioned a study from the Government Business Council that looked at the perceptions, attitudes and experiences of state and local leaders around the cybersecurity issue. The results were surprising in a number of ways. Learn more about their findings and the ways in which state and local governments can combat cybersecurity threats with this eBook.

    View

When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.