The Language Corps

The federal government wants to create a pool of linguists for emergencies at home and abroad.

Americans speak more than 160 "living" languages (and several dozen extinct languages as well), but when it comes to official business, with few exceptions the government generally speaks with one voice, and that's in English. While plenty of federal, state and local agencies print forms and offer assistance in multiple languages to more effectively serve diverse communities, those efforts fall far short of the communication skills needed in a national emergency. The Defense Department hopes to change that by creating a Language Corps whose members could be deployed during a crisis.

"You can imagine a whole set of scenarios that might require short-term needs for people with language skills," says Robert O. Slater, director of the National Security Education Program and the program manager for the Language Corps pilot, a three-year effort to test and demonstrate the concept. Under the pilot, Defense will recruit at least 1,000 volunteers to serve in a national pool of linguists that can be tapped for emergency relief work at home and abroad; within that pool of volunteers will be a dedicated group under contractual obligation to serve various government agencies or organizations on demand, much like a military reserve unit operates.

Natural disasters and disease outbreaks loom large among the scenarios for which the corps could be deployed. When Hurricane Katrina barreled across the Gulf Coast on Aug. 29, 2005, tens of thousands of Vietnamese Americans, many of them shrimp fishermen who spoke little English, fled flooded homes only to find themselves adrift as refugees in new communities. So serious was the situation, the U.S. Agency for International Development sent two Vietnamese translators to the Federal Emergency Management Agency's Disaster Recovery Center in Mobile, Ala.

Likewise, the military frequently is called upon to lend logistics support for global humanitarian relief operations, such as recent mudslides in the Philippines or the 2004 tsunami in Indonesia. "The military deployed a lot of professionals to help, but language skills clearly were lacking," Slater says. "It could be any kind of international scenario, either in hostile surroundings-obviously any member of the corps would have to agree to that before they were deployed-or a disaster," he says.

Defense has contracted with General Dynamics Information Technology to develop and test various organization concepts for the Language Corps to work out the mechanics of recruiting, hiring and certifying linguists, and help determine the pay and benefits required to attract sufficient talent. Slater does not envision any age restrictions, other than the minimum age limits for employment prescribed under federal law, or fitness requirements for joining the corps.

Program officials expect to begin recruiting this fall for the 10 languages that will be represented in the pilot program. The languages had not been chosen by late June, but the goal is to select languages for which there is a very large pool of speakers, such as Korean or Chinese, as well as for obscure languages for which the pool is extremely small, which will represent a range of challenges the corps likely would experience.

Working out the nature of the contractual arrangement for dedicated personnel will be a challenge as will identifying the best way to organize a permanent corps after the pilot expires in three years, Slater says: "How is this going to be financed? How is it going to be structured in a way that doesn't create an enormous, expensive bureaucracy?" Defense isn't necessarily interested in operating the Corps over the long haul, according to Slater: "We just agreed to take this on at the pilot level."

"In theory, everybody admits [the Language Corps] would be an important contribution [to national preparedness]. We haven't run into any opposition, but I think there's some skepticism that it can actually work," Slater says.

Stay up-to-date with federal news alerts and analysis — Sign up for GovExec's email newsletters.
Close [ x ] More from GovExec

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from
We think these reports might interest you:

  • Going Agile:Revolutionizing Federal Digital Services Delivery

    Here’s one indication that times have changed: Harriet Tubman is going to be the next face of the twenty dollar bill. Another sign of change? The way in which the federal government arrived at that decision.

  • Cyber Risk Report: Cybercrime Trends from 2016

    In our first half 2016 cyber trends report, SurfWatch Labs threat intelligence analysts noted one key theme – the interconnected nature of cybercrime – and the second half of the year saw organizations continuing to struggle with that reality. The number of potential cyber threats, the pool of already compromised information, and the ease of finding increasingly sophisticated cybercriminal tools continued to snowball throughout the year.

  • Featured Content from RSA Conference: Dissed by NIST

    Learn more about the latest draft of the U.S. National Institute of Standards and Technology guidance document on authentication and lifecycle management.

  • GBC Issue Brief: The Future of 9-1-1

    A Look Into the Next Generation of Emergency Services

  • GBC Survey Report: Securing the Perimeters

    A candid survey on cybersecurity in state and local governments

  • The New IP: Moving Government Agencies Toward the Network of The Future

    Federal IT managers are looking to modernize legacy network infrastructures that are taxed by growing demands from mobile devices, video, vast amounts of data, and more. This issue brief discusses the federal government network landscape, as well as market, financial force drivers for network modernization.

  • eBook: State & Local Cybersecurity

    CenturyLink is committed to helping state and local governments meet their cybersecurity challenges. Towards that end, CenturyLink commissioned a study from the Government Business Council that looked at the perceptions, attitudes and experiences of state and local leaders around the cybersecurity issue. The results were surprising in a number of ways. Learn more about their findings and the ways in which state and local governments can combat cybersecurity threats with this eBook.


When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.