Picture This

Rising accuracy rate makes face recognition technology a viable security tool.

Eighty percent is a decent success rate in most cases. But for a security system meant to deny entry to terrorists and other criminals, while letting others pass through quickly, it's not good enough.

When the National Institute of Standards and Technology conducted a test of face recognition products in 2002, it reported a 20 percent error rate-the number of innocent people falsely identified as security risks-for the three technologies evaluated. That was a marked improvement over the 54 percent error rate in a 1997 government test and a nearly 80 percent error rate in 1993.

"One out of five people having a mistake-that is a carnival trick, not a security solution," says Jeremy Grant, a senior vice president and identity solutions analyst at Stanford Washington Research Group in Washington.

This spotty history does much to explain the excitement over the 2006 face recognition product test, the results of which NIST released in late March. The error rate for some systems is now down to 1 percent. Grant and others say the orders-of-magnitude improvement marks the arrival of face recognition technology as a legitimate security tool for federal agencies and private entities.

In a test involving still images, Google subsidiary Neven Vision of Santa Monica, Calif., was the most accurate system, registering a 1 percent false rejection rate. When NIST used 3-D images, the face recognition technology from Viisage, a subsidiary of L-1 Identity Solutions Inc. of Stamford, Conn., won with false rejection rates ranging from 0.5 percent to 3.1 percent.

What really drives home the viability of these tools, according to the NIST test, is that automated face recognition technologies are capable of equaling or surpassing the performance of an average person perusing mug shots. Undergraduate students at The University of Texas at Dallas were shown 80 pairs of photographs for two seconds at a time and asked whether the two faces were the same person. They also had to rate their confidence in their answers. Six out of seven automated systems outperformed the students.

Improvements in face recognition technology are due to several factors. Advances in algorithms played a large part, increasing the technology's performance by a factor of four to six, according to NIST. But the dramatic upswing, the study noted, also was a result of higher resolution images and more consistent lighting. So as cameras improve, face recognition technology gets better too.

While the 2006 test showed a marked improvement in the technologies' ability to match faces across changes in lighting-systems made by Neven Vision, Viisage, the Samsung Advanced Institute of Technology and the German firm Cognitec Systems all fared better than the top-rated products in a January 2005 test-the accuracy of face recognition systems drops dramatically as the illumination for the photographs becomes less standard, the NIST report said.

Grant says this means that face recognition is still a stretch for access control systems that use cameras to scan crowds and attempt to match faces against photographs in terrorist and criminal databases. Settings where photographs are taken with a standard illumination and background-driver's licenses, passports and other credentials-are a better fit.

NIST also studied iris scanners and found that the most accurate one, a combination of technology from French company Sagem Morpho and L-1 subsidiary Iridian Technologies, performed impressively, with an error rate of about 1 percent. But in the first head-to-head evaluation of multiple biometrics, NIST found that iris- and face-based recognition systems had "comparable accuracy." Grant says this is a blow to manufacturers of iris scanners that have touted their products as more accurate than face recognition.

Ultimately, Grant says, federal agencies, law enforcement authorities and others could opt to use systems with multiple biometric components. Checking fingerprints against an FBI database while also comparing mug shots against another database increases certainty about identity and decreases the chances of misidentifying a criminal as harmless.

Stay up-to-date with federal news alerts and analysis — Sign up for GovExec's email newsletters.
Close [ x ] More from GovExec

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from GovExec.com.
We think these reports might interest you:

  • Sponsored by G Suite

    Cross-Agency Teamwork, Anytime and Anywhere

    Dan McCrae, director of IT service delivery division, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA)

  • Data-Centric Security vs. Database-Level Security

    Database-level encryption had its origins in the 1990s and early 2000s in response to very basic risks which largely revolved around the theft of servers, backup tapes and other physical-layer assets. As noted in Verizon’s 2014, Data Breach Investigations Report (DBIR)1, threats today are far more advanced and dangerous.

  • Federal IT Applications: Assessing Government's Core Drivers

    In order to better understand the current state of external and internal-facing agency workplace applications, Government Business Council (GBC) and Riverbed undertook an in-depth research study of federal employees. Overall, survey findings indicate that federal IT applications still face a gamut of challenges with regard to quality, reliability, and performance management.

  • PIV- I And Multifactor Authentication: The Best Defense for Federal Government Contractors

    This white paper explores NIST SP 800-171 and why compliance is critical to federal government contractors, especially those that work with the Department of Defense, as well as how leveraging PIV-I credentialing with multifactor authentication can be used as a defense against cyberattacks

  • Toward A More Innovative Government

    This research study aims to understand how state and local leaders regard their agency’s innovation efforts and what they are doing to overcome the challenges they face in successfully implementing these efforts.

  • From Volume to Value: UK’s NHS Digital Provides U.S. Healthcare Agencies A Roadmap For Value-Based Payment Models

    The U.S. healthcare industry is rapidly moving away from traditional fee-for-service models and towards value-based purchasing that reimburses physicians for quality of care in place of frequency of care.

  • GBC Flash Poll: Is Your Agency Safe?

    Federal leaders weigh in on the state of information security


When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.