Rapid Reaction

From socks to rifle scopes, the Army is moving new equipment to soldiers faster than ever.

An Army might march on its stomach, but good boots and navigation equipment sure help. When soldiers deployed to Afghanistan in 2002, they lacked both. It wasn't long before commanders started hearing complaints about boots shredding under the stress of the mountainous terrain and families started getting requests for care packages that included Global Positioning System receivers. The soldiers might have been trained for their mission, but they weren't well equipped for it.

Rapid isn't a word most people associate with Army procurement, so the service's leaders decided to bypass the traditional acquisition system, creating the optimistically named Rapid Fielding Initiative in 2003. While speed is a relative term, by all accounts RFI has shaved years off the time it takes to get needed equipment to the field. Once the need for a particular item is identified, requests can be met in a matter of weeks in most cases. By the end of September, the program had distributed more than 750,000 "kits" to soldiers that included everything from boots (Gore-Tex-lined for Afghanistan-bound troops or breathable for desert-bound troops) to binoculars and multiband radios.

The program continues to evolve as the Army culls lessons from ongoing combat operations, says Col. Michael Bonheim, program director for the Rapid Fielding Initiative. The initial kits contained just over a dozen items when the Army began fielding them in late 2003; today they include nearly 60 items.

While many of the items soldiers wanted-rifle scopes, moisture-wicking undergarments, more comfortable and effective helmets-were already in the Army's inventory, they weren't available in large enough quantities to give to all deploying troops. Or if they were available in sufficient quantities, the Army wasn't aware of it and didn't have an effective system for distributing the goods where they were most needed, Bonheim says.

During the Cold War, the Army fielded soldiers' gear by installation through a sequential process, but deployments to Afghanistan and Iraq did not follow any established sequence. Under the RFI program, mobile distribution teams visit an average of 14 installations a month and distribute about 24,000 kits. In addition, two fielding sites in Afghanistan and Kuwait field about 1,000 kits a month to soldiers who are deployed individually, as opposed to with units.

Many of the items provided under the Rapid Fielding Initiative improve survivability as well as comfort. For example, the Army recently began sending out a new type of earplug that protects the ear drum without jeopardizing a soldier's situational awareness-which can make a life-and-death difference on combat patrol. Too often, commanders reported that troops were removing their earplugs to better hear what was going on around them, or because the plugs were too uncomfortable. Besides being more effective, the new earplugs are smaller and easier to wear, factors Army leaders hope will reduce hearing loss among soldiers.

The challenge, Bonheim says, will be sustaining the program, which is slated to end Sept. 30, 2007. Army leaders now are discussing ways to extend it in the 2008 budget. "In some ways, the program is a victim of its success" and the heightened expectations it has brought for buying and moving equipment quickly, Bonheim says. In August, the program office solicited proposals from commercial firms for renewable and hybrid energy systems, which the service hopes to begin testing in the field soon.

As materials and gear continue to improve, demands for new equipment will only grow, Bonheim says. And for him, the mission is more than a professional duty: His son, now a second lieutenant in the Army, will get his RFI kit at the end of the year.

Stay up-to-date with federal news alerts and analysis — Sign up for GovExec's email newsletters.
Close [ x ] More from GovExec

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from GovExec.com.
We think these reports might interest you:

  • Sponsored by G Suite

    Cross-Agency Teamwork, Anytime and Anywhere

    Dan McCrae, director of IT service delivery division, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA)

  • Data-Centric Security vs. Database-Level Security

    Database-level encryption had its origins in the 1990s and early 2000s in response to very basic risks which largely revolved around the theft of servers, backup tapes and other physical-layer assets. As noted in Verizon’s 2014, Data Breach Investigations Report (DBIR)1, threats today are far more advanced and dangerous.

  • Federal IT Applications: Assessing Government's Core Drivers

    In order to better understand the current state of external and internal-facing agency workplace applications, Government Business Council (GBC) and Riverbed undertook an in-depth research study of federal employees. Overall, survey findings indicate that federal IT applications still face a gamut of challenges with regard to quality, reliability, and performance management.

  • PIV- I And Multifactor Authentication: The Best Defense for Federal Government Contractors

    This white paper explores NIST SP 800-171 and why compliance is critical to federal government contractors, especially those that work with the Department of Defense, as well as how leveraging PIV-I credentialing with multifactor authentication can be used as a defense against cyberattacks

  • Toward A More Innovative Government

    This research study aims to understand how state and local leaders regard their agency’s innovation efforts and what they are doing to overcome the challenges they face in successfully implementing these efforts.

  • From Volume to Value: UK’s NHS Digital Provides U.S. Healthcare Agencies A Roadmap For Value-Based Payment Models

    The U.S. healthcare industry is rapidly moving away from traditional fee-for-service models and towards value-based purchasing that reimburses physicians for quality of care in place of frequency of care.

  • GBC Flash Poll: Is Your Agency Safe?

    Federal leaders weigh in on the state of information security


When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.