Gambling on Reorganization

Homeland Security Secretary Michael Chertoff rolls the dice on disaster preparedness on the eve of hurricane season.

On Feb. 15, one year to the day after becoming chief of the Homeland Security Department, Michael Chertoff found himself sitting before a Senate committee to account for failures in the federal government's response to Hurricane Katrina and the flooding of New Orleans.

House Republicans had just released a 520-page report finding that Katrina response was bungled at all levels of government. Some of the harshest criticism, however, was directed at Chertoff, saying he executed his responsibilities "late, ineffectively, or not at all." Lives were lost and thousands experienced prolonged suffering due, in part, to the federal government's sluggish response, investigators concluded.

The report also found that the Federal Emergency Management Agency's response to the catastrophe was inadequate. Former FEMA director Michael Brown resigned in September under mounting criticism of his actions and qualifications. Now critics were calling for Chertoff to resign.

Chertoff has taken the blows for the Bush administration. "I am responsible for the Department of Homeland Security, and I am accountable and accept responsibility for the performance of the entire department, the bad and the good," he told the Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee.

The House report prompted public calls for an overhaul of the nation's emergency management system. Republicans and Democrats alike say FEMA should be removed from DHS and made an independent agency, which it was before the department was created in 2003.

"Confidence in FEMA and, by extension, the Department of Homeland Security, is at an all-time low," says Rep. Bennie Thompson, D-Miss., ranking member of the House Homeland Security Committee.

Chertoff agrees that FEMA reforms are needed, but has resisted calls for an extensive overhaul. Last summer, he announced that preparedness activities would be stripped from FEMA and placed under a new Preparedness Directorate. FEMA, he said, would focus on its core mission of response and recovery to disasters.

Some lawmakers believe Chertoff is taking a huge gamble in reorganizing preparedness and response functions.

The White House released its own Katrina review Feb. 23. The 228-page report made 125 recommendations for reform but did not fault any individuals. Indeed, it supported Chertoff's vision of a Preparedness Directorate, and did not recommend removing FEMA from DHS.

FEMA began to lose its oversight of preparedness activities, such as grants to first responders, before Chertoff took over. Critics say that loss started the agency's demise. The National Emergency Management Association objected to Chertoff's reorganization last summer, arguing that it further breaks the integrated framework of preparedness, response, recovery and miti-gation in disaster management.

Chertoff's vision for preparedness and response is largely untested. His reforms went into effect in October, after Katrina struck. But the clock is ticking, as a new hurricane season begins June 1. "Four-and-a-half years after 9/11, America is still not ready for prime time," the House report stated. "This is particularly distressing because we know we remain at risk for terrorist attacks, and because the 2006 hurricane season is right around the corner."

"Whether FEMA stays in DHS or not, we have to put FEMA back together again," Rep. Don Young, R-Alaska, chairman of the House Transportation and Infrastructure Committee, told Chertoff in February. "Preparedness responsibility is in one place and response is in another."

Chertoff thinks the nation will benefit from having all preparedness functions under one directorate. He says he realized when he took over the department that preparedness activities were disjointed. Some activities are beyond the scope of FEMA, such as law enforcement grants and infrastructure protection, he says.

He notes that the department now has its first undersecretary for preparedness, George Foresman, and a chief medical officer, Dr. Jeffrey W. Runge. And Chertoff says FEMA also benefits from being part of DHS, adding that he believes it would be a "huge mistake" to make the agency independent.

Reforms within FEMA include: upgrading information technology to track shipments and manage inventories, expanding claims management to bring up to 200,000 the number of victim registrations that can be accepted per day, improving debris removal, putting together a highly trained team of permanent employees to serve as a core workforce during catastrophes, and developing hardened communications equipment that will work during disasters.

The department also plans to deploy registration assistance trucks with laptops and communications equipment directly to areas where victims have taken shelter, enabling them to register for and receive assistance faster and more easily.

Chertoff acknowledges that some of the reforms will take time to implement. But his critics say time and their patience are running out.

Stay up-to-date with federal news alerts and analysis — Sign up for GovExec's email newsletters.
Close [ x ] More from GovExec

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from
We think these reports might interest you:

  • Sponsored by Brocade

    Best of 2016 Federal Forum eBook

    Earlier this summer, Federal and tech industry leaders convened to talk security, machine learning, network modernization, DevOps, and much more at the 2016 Federal Forum. This eBook includes a useful summary highlighting the best content shared at the 2016 Federal Forum to help agencies modernize their network infrastructure.

  • Sponsored by CDW-G

    GBC Flash Poll Series: Merger & Acquisitions

    Download this GBC Flash Poll to learn more about federal perspectives on the impact of industry consolidation.

  • Sponsored by One Identity

    One Nation Under Guard: Securing User Identities Across State and Local Government

    In 2016, the government can expect even more sophisticated threats on the horizon, making it all the more imperative that agencies enforce proper identity and access management (IAM) practices. In order to better measure the current state of IAM at the state and local level, Government Business Council (GBC) conducted an in-depth research study of state and local employees.

  • Sponsored by Aquilent

    The Next Federal Evolution of Cloud

    This GBC report explains the evolution of cloud computing in federal government, and provides an outlook for the future of the cloud in government IT.

  • Sponsored by Aquilent

    A DevOps Roadmap for the Federal Government

    This GBC Report discusses how DevOps is steadily gaining traction among some of government's leading IT developers and agencies.

  • Sponsored by LTC Partners, administrators of the Federal Long Term Care Insurance Program

    Approaching the Brink of Federal Retirement

    Approximately 10,000 baby boomers are reaching retirement age per day, and a growing number of federal employees are preparing themselves for the next chapter of their lives. Learn how to tackle the challenges that today's workforce faces in laying the groundwork for a smooth and secure retirement.

  • Sponsored by Hewlett Packard Enterprise

    Cyber Defense 101: Arming the Next Generation of Government Employees

    Read this issue brief to learn about the sector's most potent challenges in the new cyber landscape and how government organizations are building a robust, threat-aware infrastructure

  • Sponsored by Aquilent

    GBC Issue Brief: Cultivating Digital Services in the Federal Landscape

    Read this GBC issue brief to learn more about the current state of digital services in the government, and how key players are pushing enhancements towards a user-centric approach.

  • Sponsored by CDW-G

    Joint Enterprise Licensing Agreements

    Read this eBook to learn how defense agencies can achieve savings and efficiencies with an Enterprise Software Agreement.

  • Sponsored by Cloudera

    Government Forum Content Library

    Get all the essential resources needed for effective technology strategies in the federal landscape.


When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.