Briefing

Eyes on Five Sides

The Defense Department protects us, but who's protecting the Pentagon?

Steven Calvery's job is no cakewalk. The director of the Pentagon Force Protection Agency oversees the safekeeping of the Pentagon and other Defense facilities around Washington.

Wedged among three major highways and located at the largest Metro facility in the Washington region, the Pentagon operates like a city. In 2009, President Obama visited the complex about 11 times, and on a typical weekday, more than 25,000 people pass through its doors.

But the security infrastructure of the world's largest office building remains "old and antiquated," says Calvery, who admits that screening every employee entering and exiting the complex is a "physical impossibility," because of the volume of human traffic and the state of technology.

When a gunman opened fire near the Pentagon entrance in March, "it was kind of a wake-up call for us," Calvery says. The department installed better lighting and stepped up random checks and plans to expand the buffer area outside.

Now the department is in its first year of Pentagon Sentry, a $200 million program created during the fiscal 2010 budget process and spread out over five years to make permanent the security measures implemented at the Pentagon after the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks.

After the Fort Hood, Texas, massacre in November 2009, threats from within could crop up anywhere, according to Calvery. "People get fired from the federal government (and they do get fired from the federal government)," he says. "We have those people threatening other employees, employees threatening each other, we have domestic issues. It's almost like a small city here, and we've got to deal with all those issues and its impacts on the security of people at work."

-Dawn Lim

Whistle Stop

Revered by some and reviled by others, whistleblowers have been compelling figures. Recently, however, the tide has been turning. The message from the Obama administration: Nobody likes a tattletale.

This spring, the government put the squeeze on federal employees who have publicly divulged information. A few examples:

The military in early June arrested an Army intelligence analyst who said he released a classified combat video and hundreds of thousands of classified State Department records to whistleblower site WikiLeaks.org.

On May 12, the Merit Systems Protection Board upheld the Homeland Security Department's decision to fire a former federal air marshal for un- authorized disclosure of "sensitive security information." Robert MacLean had sent an agency budget-cutting memo he received on his cell phone to an MSNBC reporter in 2003, and said the department would be pulling air marshals from flights requiring costly overnight hotels amid heightened intelligence warnings about planned terrorist attacks on U.S. aircraft.

In April, a former senior National Security Agency official who divulged information on billions of dollars of cost overruns and technical problems at the agency to a former Baltimore Sun reporter, was indicted on 10 counts for storing classified information, lying and destroying evidence.

-Dawn Lim

Stay up-to-date with federal news alerts and analysis — Sign up for GovExec's email newsletters.
FROM OUR SPONSORS
JOIN THE DISCUSSION
Close [ x ] More from GovExec
 
 

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from GovExec.com.
We think these reports might interest you:

  • Sponsored by G Suite

    Cross-Agency Teamwork, Anytime and Anywhere

    Dan McCrae, director of IT service delivery division, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA)

    Download
  • Data-Centric Security vs. Database-Level Security

    Database-level encryption had its origins in the 1990s and early 2000s in response to very basic risks which largely revolved around the theft of servers, backup tapes and other physical-layer assets. As noted in Verizon’s 2014, Data Breach Investigations Report (DBIR)1, threats today are far more advanced and dangerous.

    Download
  • Federal IT Applications: Assessing Government's Core Drivers

    In order to better understand the current state of external and internal-facing agency workplace applications, Government Business Council (GBC) and Riverbed undertook an in-depth research study of federal employees. Overall, survey findings indicate that federal IT applications still face a gamut of challenges with regard to quality, reliability, and performance management.

    Download
  • PIV- I And Multifactor Authentication: The Best Defense for Federal Government Contractors

    This white paper explores NIST SP 800-171 and why compliance is critical to federal government contractors, especially those that work with the Department of Defense, as well as how leveraging PIV-I credentialing with multifactor authentication can be used as a defense against cyberattacks

    Download
  • Toward A More Innovative Government

    This research study aims to understand how state and local leaders regard their agency’s innovation efforts and what they are doing to overcome the challenges they face in successfully implementing these efforts.

    Download
  • From Volume to Value: UK’s NHS Digital Provides U.S. Healthcare Agencies A Roadmap For Value-Based Payment Models

    The U.S. healthcare industry is rapidly moving away from traditional fee-for-service models and towards value-based purchasing that reimburses physicians for quality of care in place of frequency of care.

    Download
  • GBC Flash Poll: Is Your Agency Safe?

    Federal leaders weigh in on the state of information security

    Download

When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.