Federal Education

Timothy B. Clark

Are subsidies really required to get the workforce we need?

For years, the tag line on our front cover has characterized Government Executive as "Government's Business Magazine." It telegraphs our mission: to address the many activities of federal government and the people and systems that make them work.

Gradually, the phrase has gained currency. IBM's Center for the Business of Government, for example, started up in 1998. And now, a new educational institution is characterizing itself as "the only college dedicated to the business of government."

The key entrepreneur in the nascent College for Public Leadership is Tom Dungan, the forward-thinking president of Management Concepts of Vienna, Va. His firm has built a good business delivering practical training and education in common administrative functions of government. Many courses carry educational certification, but Dungan had a larger vision-providing a full spectrum of education up to the level of undergraduate and master's degrees. So he approached a well-regarded Jesuit institution, Regis University, and formed a partnership to give public servants opportunities to deepen their learning.

Top-ranking feds aspire to programs offered by the likes of Harvard's Kennedy School of Government or the Federal Executive Institute. The new college is aimed at lower ranks, says president and academic dean Terry Rawls, some of whom might need a few credits to complete college. The CFPL will offer undergraduate and master's degrees in business administration (business of government) and also a master's degree in organization leadership (federal leadership). CFPL can tailor its offerings to match the needs of individual agencies, says Rawls. Much of the instruction will be asynchronous-that is, online and available whenever convenient for the student.

The CFPL initiative strikes me as offering practical and affordable opportunities for workers and agencies to build knowledge and skills. These qualities also are characteristic of the Graduate School, USDA, which has an 85-year track record of serving the federal community. It, too, has a wide range of accredited courses and partnerships with degree-granting universities such as Georgetown, Rutgers and the University of the District of Columbia.

Such offerings seem more focused and affordable than larger schemes like the proposed public service academy. The academy would grant full West-Point-style scholarships to 5,000 undergraduates. They would wear uniforms and pledge to spend five years in public service. Debt forgiveness schemes (like one just enacted) also seem less than essential. Federal jobs are in demand; it's hard to get one. The average age of the new federal hire is 33. The pay is decent and the benefits first class. Today's young adults are inclined toward public service. Why, then, all the clamor for subsidies? Why not hew to market signals? If in specific occupations, agencies can't attract the right talent, let's increase pay for these hard-to-fill spots. Otherwise, programs offered by existing and new institutions like the CFPL should fit the bill.

Tim Signature

Stay up-to-date with federal news alerts and analysis — Sign up for GovExec's email newsletters.
Close [ x ] More from GovExec

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from GovExec.com.
We think these reports might interest you:

  • Sponsored by G Suite

    Cross-Agency Teamwork, Anytime and Anywhere

    Dan McCrae, director of IT service delivery division, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA)

  • Data-Centric Security vs. Database-Level Security

    Database-level encryption had its origins in the 1990s and early 2000s in response to very basic risks which largely revolved around the theft of servers, backup tapes and other physical-layer assets. As noted in Verizon’s 2014, Data Breach Investigations Report (DBIR)1, threats today are far more advanced and dangerous.

  • Federal IT Applications: Assessing Government's Core Drivers

    In order to better understand the current state of external and internal-facing agency workplace applications, Government Business Council (GBC) and Riverbed undertook an in-depth research study of federal employees. Overall, survey findings indicate that federal IT applications still face a gamut of challenges with regard to quality, reliability, and performance management.

  • PIV- I And Multifactor Authentication: The Best Defense for Federal Government Contractors

    This white paper explores NIST SP 800-171 and why compliance is critical to federal government contractors, especially those that work with the Department of Defense, as well as how leveraging PIV-I credentialing with multifactor authentication can be used as a defense against cyberattacks

  • Toward A More Innovative Government

    This research study aims to understand how state and local leaders regard their agency’s innovation efforts and what they are doing to overcome the challenges they face in successfully implementing these efforts.

  • From Volume to Value: UK’s NHS Digital Provides U.S. Healthcare Agencies A Roadmap For Value-Based Payment Models

    The U.S. healthcare industry is rapidly moving away from traditional fee-for-service models and towards value-based purchasing that reimburses physicians for quality of care in place of frequency of care.

  • GBC Flash Poll: Is Your Agency Safe?

    Federal leaders weigh in on the state of information security


When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.