Generals Speak Out

Timothy B. Clark

Emphasizing combat instead of nation-building has some concerned.

Stewardship of the ground wars that America fights in Iraq and Afghanistan has passed to new generals in the past few months with Senate confirmation of Gen. James T. Conway as commandant of the Marine Corps, and of Gen. George W. Casey Jr. as Army chief of staff. I was privileged to interview Conway on Feb. 8, completing a series with the armed service chiefs that began last May with Chief of Naval Operations Michael G. Mullen and continued in August with Air Force Chief of Staff Gen. T. Michael Moseley and Army Chief of Staff Gen. Peter J. Schoomaker.

Like other senior commanders, Conway is worried that the military isn't equipped to achieve the nation-building tasks needed to rebuild failed states.

He recalled that in 2003, after the fall of Baghdad, his marines were ordered to take control of the nine Iraqi provinces in the South and to link up with U.S. government personnel "who would assist us in all of the things that go [into] reconstruction of a nation." But, he said, only one or two U.S. civilian officials were there, "and so very quickly, my battalion commanders started doing those things that had to be done. They became part of the city council. They were hiring and firing mayors and police chiefs. They were the agriculture engineer for the date palm groves. They were whatever the local area needed. . . . They weren't experts and they had not been trained for it, but they did an incredible job given the circumstance."

Many military leaders say the United States cannot succeed in the region without much more work to rebuild economies and key institutions of civil society. Yet the State Department cannot require staff to deploy to dangerous places, and the other major agencies of government are even less equipped to help. Thus, Conway calls for a Goldwater-Nichols-style law that would encourage other agencies to help the military. The Department of Defense Reorganization Act of 1986, named for Sen. Barry Goldwater, R-Ariz., and Rep. William Flynt Nichols, D-Ala., reorganized the military so that the services would work together more effectively.

In planning for a new Africa Command, Conway said, "There is much less place there for military and kinetic operations than there is for humanitarian assistance, education, and bringing these countries along for a better quality of life that, in turn, will encourage them to counter extremists."

These themes are found in the reporting of Government Executive's military correspondent, Greg Grant, who joined our staff last year.

Grant spent months embedded with the military in both Iraq and Afghanistan. He was with the Army's 3rd Infantry Division when it took the Baghdad airport by brute force, and again when it returned later to fight a shadowy insurgency that tanks could not mow down. He observed firsthand the problems our government has in staffing Provincial Reconstruction Teams supposed to be at the heart of nation-building, and he wrote about them in our December issue. This month, in a sober assessment of Afghanistan's prospects, he writes that the United States risks "losing the strategic battle because of its pursuit of a counterterror strategy that emphasizes killing and capturing Taliban, instead of a counterinsurgency strategy that places more emphasis on reconstruction."

Tim Signature
Stay up-to-date with federal news alerts and analysis — Sign up for GovExec's email newsletters.
Close [ x ] More from GovExec

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from
We think these reports might interest you:

  • Forecasting Cloud's Future

    Conversations with Federal, State, and Local Technology Leaders on Cloud-Driven Digital Transformation

  • The Big Data Campaign Trail

    With everyone so focused on security following recent breaches at federal, state and local government and education institutions, there has been little emphasis on the need for better operations. This report breaks down some of the biggest operational challenges in IT management and provides insight into how agencies and leaders can successfully solve some of the biggest lingering government IT issues.

  • Communicating Innovation in Federal Government

    Federal Government spending on ‘obsolete technology’ continues to increase. Supporting the twin pillars of improved digital service delivery for citizens on the one hand, and the increasingly optimized and flexible working practices for federal employees on the other, are neither easy nor inexpensive tasks. This whitepaper explores how federal agencies can leverage the value of existing agency technology assets while offering IT leaders the ability to implement the kind of employee productivity, citizen service improvements and security demanded by federal oversight.

  • IT Transformation Trends: Flash Storage as a Strategic IT Asset

    MIT Technology Review: Flash Storage As a Strategic IT Asset For the first time in decades, IT leaders now consider all-flash storage as a strategic IT asset. IT has become a new operating model that enables self-service with high performance, density and resiliency. It also offers the self-service agility of the public cloud combined with the security, performance, and cost-effectiveness of a private cloud. Download this MIT Technology Review paper to learn more about how all-flash storage is transforming the data center.

  • Ongoing Efforts in Veterans Health Care Modernization

    This report discusses the current state of veterans health care


When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.