Generals Speak Out

Timothy B. Clark

Emphasizing combat instead of nation-building has some concerned.

Stewardship of the ground wars that America fights in Iraq and Afghanistan has passed to new generals in the past few months with Senate confirmation of Gen. James T. Conway as commandant of the Marine Corps, and of Gen. George W. Casey Jr. as Army chief of staff. I was privileged to interview Conway on Feb. 8, completing a series with the armed service chiefs that began last May with Chief of Naval Operations Michael G. Mullen and continued in August with Air Force Chief of Staff Gen. T. Michael Moseley and Army Chief of Staff Gen. Peter J. Schoomaker.

Like other senior commanders, Conway is worried that the military isn't equipped to achieve the nation-building tasks needed to rebuild failed states.

He recalled that in 2003, after the fall of Baghdad, his marines were ordered to take control of the nine Iraqi provinces in the South and to link up with U.S. government personnel "who would assist us in all of the things that go [into] reconstruction of a nation." But, he said, only one or two U.S. civilian officials were there, "and so very quickly, my battalion commanders started doing those things that had to be done. They became part of the city council. They were hiring and firing mayors and police chiefs. They were the agriculture engineer for the date palm groves. They were whatever the local area needed. . . . They weren't experts and they had not been trained for it, but they did an incredible job given the circumstance."

Many military leaders say the United States cannot succeed in the region without much more work to rebuild economies and key institutions of civil society. Yet the State Department cannot require staff to deploy to dangerous places, and the other major agencies of government are even less equipped to help. Thus, Conway calls for a Goldwater-Nichols-style law that would encourage other agencies to help the military. The Department of Defense Reorganization Act of 1986, named for Sen. Barry Goldwater, R-Ariz., and Rep. William Flynt Nichols, D-Ala., reorganized the military so that the services would work together more effectively.

In planning for a new Africa Command, Conway said, "There is much less place there for military and kinetic operations than there is for humanitarian assistance, education, and bringing these countries along for a better quality of life that, in turn, will encourage them to counter extremists."

These themes are found in the reporting of Government Executive's military correspondent, Greg Grant, who joined our staff last year.

Grant spent months embedded with the military in both Iraq and Afghanistan. He was with the Army's 3rd Infantry Division when it took the Baghdad airport by brute force, and again when it returned later to fight a shadowy insurgency that tanks could not mow down. He observed firsthand the problems our government has in staffing Provincial Reconstruction Teams supposed to be at the heart of nation-building, and he wrote about them in our December issue. This month, in a sober assessment of Afghanistan's prospects, he writes that the United States risks "losing the strategic battle because of its pursuit of a counterterror strategy that emphasizes killing and capturing Taliban, instead of a counterinsurgency strategy that places more emphasis on reconstruction."

Tim Signature
Stay up-to-date with federal news alerts and analysis — Sign up for GovExec's email newsletters.
Close [ x ] More from GovExec

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from
We think these reports might interest you:

  • Sponsored by G Suite

    Cross-Agency Teamwork, Anytime and Anywhere

    Dan McCrae, director of IT service delivery division, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA)

  • Data-Centric Security vs. Database-Level Security

    Database-level encryption had its origins in the 1990s and early 2000s in response to very basic risks which largely revolved around the theft of servers, backup tapes and other physical-layer assets. As noted in Verizon’s 2014, Data Breach Investigations Report (DBIR)1, threats today are far more advanced and dangerous.

  • Federal IT Applications: Assessing Government's Core Drivers

    In order to better understand the current state of external and internal-facing agency workplace applications, Government Business Council (GBC) and Riverbed undertook an in-depth research study of federal employees. Overall, survey findings indicate that federal IT applications still face a gamut of challenges with regard to quality, reliability, and performance management.

  • PIV- I And Multifactor Authentication: The Best Defense for Federal Government Contractors

    This white paper explores NIST SP 800-171 and why compliance is critical to federal government contractors, especially those that work with the Department of Defense, as well as how leveraging PIV-I credentialing with multifactor authentication can be used as a defense against cyberattacks

  • Toward A More Innovative Government

    This research study aims to understand how state and local leaders regard their agency’s innovation efforts and what they are doing to overcome the challenges they face in successfully implementing these efforts.

  • From Volume to Value: UK’s NHS Digital Provides U.S. Healthcare Agencies A Roadmap For Value-Based Payment Models

    The U.S. healthcare industry is rapidly moving away from traditional fee-for-service models and towards value-based purchasing that reimburses physicians for quality of care in place of frequency of care.

  • GBC Flash Poll: Is Your Agency Safe?

    Federal leaders weigh in on the state of information security


When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.