Planning and Execution

As public programs grow more intricate, individual initiative is still essential.

Over the past decade, scholars critical of industrial-age bureaucracy have rallied around a performance- and results-based approach to meeting public sector goals that relies significantly on alliances with other institutions.

Donald Kettl, now a professor at the University of Pennsylvania, encapsulated the essence of the new theory in the millennial issue of Government Executive. "Government's traditional processes and organizations have become more marginal to the big debates," he wrote in January 2001, "from how much we pay for health care to how we solve the really tough problems-such as poverty. New processes and institutions-often nongovernmental ones-have become more central to public policy."

The complexities that confront federal officials implementing big new programs are the subject of two features in this issue. They deal with the most ambitious domestic endeavors the federal government has taken on in many years: the No Child Left Behind Act and Medicare's prescription drug program.

Brian Friel looks at the education program through the eyes of Joel Klein, chancellor of the New York City Department of Education, who is implementing the law's testing and sanctions regime. The federal government is counting on Klein, who in turn needs buy-in from many actors in the sprawling school system. He sees the challenge as nothing less than "a test of our ability to make government work."

Kimberly Palmer tells the story of the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services' huge outreach that enlisted hundreds of organizations to roll out a program now serving nearly 40 million Americans. The grass-roots agenda the agency organized, CMS administrator Mark McClellan told Palmer, will bring "a lasting change in how this agency operates, because we've seen that we can make the programs work better with these close connections."

The measures of success these new and complex programs have enjoyed can be attributed to careful planning and execution. Other federal programs, such as those dealing with disaster preparation, cannot be so proud, as Zack Phillips amusingly recounts in his report on security spending this month.

We think of government programs as huge endeavors run by complex organizations, but there's no denying the power of the individual to make a big difference. For the fifth year, we celebrate stars of the civil service, nine winners of this year's Service to America Medals program. A photograph of one of these leaders, Nancy Cox, graces our cover. Congratulations to all. Their stories will carry across the nation, not only in our pages, but also those of our sister publications, National Journal and The Atlantic, reaching an audience of more than 1 million readers with the message that in government, as in other institutions, personal initiative is what gets the job done.

Last, but not least, we are excited to introduce a new column in this issue, Shane Harris' "Intelligence File," which will track what's new and hot, known and unknown, in the sometimes secret world of federal intel.

Stay up-to-date with federal news alerts and analysis — Sign up for GovExec's email newsletters.
Close [ x ] More from GovExec

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from
We think these reports might interest you:

  • Sponsored by G Suite

    Cross-Agency Teamwork, Anytime and Anywhere

    Dan McCrae, director of IT service delivery division, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA)

  • Data-Centric Security vs. Database-Level Security

    Database-level encryption had its origins in the 1990s and early 2000s in response to very basic risks which largely revolved around the theft of servers, backup tapes and other physical-layer assets. As noted in Verizon’s 2014, Data Breach Investigations Report (DBIR)1, threats today are far more advanced and dangerous.

  • Sponsored by One Identity

    One Nation Under Guard: Securing User Identities Across State and Local Government

    In 2016, the government can expect even more sophisticated threats on the horizon, making it all the more imperative that agencies enforce proper identity and access management (IAM) practices. In order to better measure the current state of IAM at the state and local level, Government Business Council (GBC) conducted an in-depth research study of state and local employees.

  • Sponsored by Aquilent

    The Next Federal Evolution of Cloud

    This GBC report explains the evolution of cloud computing in federal government, and provides an outlook for the future of the cloud in government IT.

  • Sponsored by LTC Partners, administrators of the Federal Long Term Care Insurance Program

    Approaching the Brink of Federal Retirement

    Approximately 10,000 baby boomers are reaching retirement age per day, and a growing number of federal employees are preparing themselves for the next chapter of their lives. Learn how to tackle the challenges that today's workforce faces in laying the groundwork for a smooth and secure retirement.

  • Sponsored by Hewlett Packard Enterprise

    Cyber Defense 101: Arming the Next Generation of Government Employees

    Read this issue brief to learn about the sector's most potent challenges in the new cyber landscape and how government organizations are building a robust, threat-aware infrastructure

  • Sponsored by Aquilent

    GBC Issue Brief: Cultivating Digital Services in the Federal Landscape

    Read this GBC issue brief to learn more about the current state of digital services in the government, and how key players are pushing enhancements towards a user-centric approach.


When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.