Army Chief Schoomaker talks about his service's needs and the "masses of people that are the prize."

Army Chief of Staff Gen. Peter J. Schoomaker has the toughest job in the Pentagon, or so it seems to me, and it became clear during an Aug. 23 conversation at the National Press Club that he would not have taken it if he didn't think he could repair the problems he saw.

Schoomaker is seriously concerned about the future viability of the institution he's served for 35 years. His remarks suggested resentment that the Army has taken a back seat to the Navy and the Air Force in budget decisions over the past 15 years. He is blunt in his insistence that only people working on the ground can offer the hope of creating more stable societies in places like Afghanistan and Iraq. Schoomaker makes it clear that he did not return to duty to acquiesce in the treatment of the Army as a "Cinderella service"-living in rags while others sport expensive finery. He is on the warpath against languid congressional budgeting schedules that have the Army living hand-to-mouth, "going through life like a pauper." He is critical of the incapacity of other U.S. agencies to assign people to work in Iraq on anything other than an opt-in/opt-out basis. And he takes a statesmanlike view of America's obligation to help destitute peoples of the world whose resentment of our wealth can only breed trouble.

I asked Schoomaker why he stepped out of retirement to take the top Army job three years ago, and if he had insisted on conditions before accepting it. Duty called, he said, noting that his father, brother and now children have served in the Army. But he added that he'd had a "serious conversation" with Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld, who had agreed that "I'll do my job . . . and he would fulfill his. And so far we've gotten on very well. But my truck is parked behind the house."

Schoomaker might just head west in that truck if he can't get the Army in better shape. Asked if he had refused to follow budget guidance in planning for fiscal 2008, he said he had insisted that the Army and Rumsfeld's office "agree on the facts" of what it takes to operate the Army. That review surely will conclude that more is needed-and, Schoomaker hopes, that the high-tech Future Combat Systems program is essential. The FCS is, of course, closer to his heart than what he called "a lot of things flying around and floating in the sea."

The Army and the Marines, with boots on the ground, are now stuck with civil affairs and reconstruction duties ranging beyond their core capabilities. But, said Schoomaker, it will be this kind of "nontrigger-pulling stuff that ultimately affects the people, the masses of people that are the prize."

The prize will elude us in the world, said the general, if we can't find a way to share our wealth. With about 5 percent of the world's population, we account for more than 25 percent of worldwide consumption and about half the world's wealth, Schoomaker noted.

And so, concluded this soldier-statesman, "We have to figure out how to use our position to advance other people's condition in the world. Otherwise, we will continue to have problems."

Stay up-to-date with federal news alerts and analysis — Sign up for GovExec's email newsletters.
Close [ x ] More from GovExec

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from
We think these reports might interest you:

  • Sponsored by G Suite

    Cross-Agency Teamwork, Anytime and Anywhere

    Dan McCrae, director of IT service delivery division, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA)

  • Data-Centric Security vs. Database-Level Security

    Database-level encryption had its origins in the 1990s and early 2000s in response to very basic risks which largely revolved around the theft of servers, backup tapes and other physical-layer assets. As noted in Verizon’s 2014, Data Breach Investigations Report (DBIR)1, threats today are far more advanced and dangerous.

  • Sponsored by One Identity

    One Nation Under Guard: Securing User Identities Across State and Local Government

    In 2016, the government can expect even more sophisticated threats on the horizon, making it all the more imperative that agencies enforce proper identity and access management (IAM) practices. In order to better measure the current state of IAM at the state and local level, Government Business Council (GBC) conducted an in-depth research study of state and local employees.

  • Sponsored by Aquilent

    The Next Federal Evolution of Cloud

    This GBC report explains the evolution of cloud computing in federal government, and provides an outlook for the future of the cloud in government IT.

  • Sponsored by LTC Partners, administrators of the Federal Long Term Care Insurance Program

    Approaching the Brink of Federal Retirement

    Approximately 10,000 baby boomers are reaching retirement age per day, and a growing number of federal employees are preparing themselves for the next chapter of their lives. Learn how to tackle the challenges that today's workforce faces in laying the groundwork for a smooth and secure retirement.

  • Sponsored by Hewlett Packard Enterprise

    Cyber Defense 101: Arming the Next Generation of Government Employees

    Read this issue brief to learn about the sector's most potent challenges in the new cyber landscape and how government organizations are building a robust, threat-aware infrastructure

  • Sponsored by Aquilent

    GBC Issue Brief: Cultivating Digital Services in the Federal Landscape

    Read this GBC issue brief to learn more about the current state of digital services in the government, and how key players are pushing enhancements towards a user-centric approach.


When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.