Combat by Design

The Army aims to develop a versatile ground vehicle that integrates the best features from its current fleet.

Three industry teams are vying for a lucrative Army contract to build the next ground combat vehicle, which the top brass expects will merge the best traits from the service's current fleet into one flexible and lethal platform.

Longtime Army vehicle makers BAE Systems and General Dynamics Corp. have submitted bids for the contract in recent months, as did SAIC, which has teamed up with Boeing Co., and the German firms Krauss-Maffei Wegmann and Rheinmetall AG.

The program, which replaces the manned ground vehicle portion of the now-defunct Future Combat Systems program, is likely the biggest-ticket item in the Army's acquisition budget for the foreseeable future. The Pentagon requested $934.4 million for ground vehicle research and development in its fiscal 2011 budget request, but that figure is expected to grow considerably as they mature from concept to production.

The Army wants to buy 1,450 vehicles and estimates the price tag for the program will total about $40 billion, including development and production costs.

After studying the requirements for the vehicle following the cancellation of FCS, Army officials said they want the new model to be as lethal as the Bradley Fighting Vehicle, while also being as survivable as the mine-resistant ambush-protected vehicle fielded in Iraq and Afghanistan and as mobile as the Army's wheeled Stryker series.

General Dynamics builds the Stryker, while BAE Systems is the maker of the Bradley. Both firms had been tapped to build different versions of the FCS vehicles, the total price tag for which was estimated at $87 billion.

Service officials plan to award up to three technology development contracts in September, meaning all three bidders could continue to vie for the program. By January 2013, the Army will choose either one or two teams to build prototypes.

The Army plans to have the first ground combat vehicles ready for service in 2017.

Army Chief of Staff Gen. George W. Casey Jr. told lawmakers this spring that officials had considered buying an existing vehicle to avoid a long-term development program, but nothing met their requirements.

Defense Secretary Robert Gates, however, wants the services to "carve some time off of that seven years" for development.

Speaking in May at Fort Leavenworth, Kan., Gates pointed to the rapid procurement of the MRAP as an example of an acquisition success story. But the Defense secretary, who is not shy about ending programs he does not support, backed the ground combat vehicle effort. "I remain committed to the Army's ground vehicle modernization program-but it has to be done in a way that reflects the lessons that we've learned the last few years about war in the 21st century," he said.

Retired Lt. Gen. Theodore G. Stroup, vice president of education at of the Association of the United States Army, said any decision to speed the development timeline has to come with money-but not with any internal Amy budget offsets.

Stroup also stressed the Army cannot sacrifice the vehicle's requirements to get it to the field faster. "Everything was vetted and cross-checked and sanitized," he said.

Megan Scully is the defense reporter for CongressDaily.

Click here for the top 25 Army contractors.

Stay up-to-date with federal news alerts and analysis — Sign up for GovExec's email newsletters.
Close [ x ] More from GovExec

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from
We think these reports might interest you:

  • Sponsored by G Suite

    Cross-Agency Teamwork, Anytime and Anywhere

    Dan McCrae, director of IT service delivery division, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA)

  • Data-Centric Security vs. Database-Level Security

    Database-level encryption had its origins in the 1990s and early 2000s in response to very basic risks which largely revolved around the theft of servers, backup tapes and other physical-layer assets. As noted in Verizon’s 2014, Data Breach Investigations Report (DBIR)1, threats today are far more advanced and dangerous.

  • Sponsored by One Identity

    One Nation Under Guard: Securing User Identities Across State and Local Government

    In 2016, the government can expect even more sophisticated threats on the horizon, making it all the more imperative that agencies enforce proper identity and access management (IAM) practices. In order to better measure the current state of IAM at the state and local level, Government Business Council (GBC) conducted an in-depth research study of state and local employees.

  • Sponsored by Aquilent

    The Next Federal Evolution of Cloud

    This GBC report explains the evolution of cloud computing in federal government, and provides an outlook for the future of the cloud in government IT.

  • Sponsored by LTC Partners, administrators of the Federal Long Term Care Insurance Program

    Approaching the Brink of Federal Retirement

    Approximately 10,000 baby boomers are reaching retirement age per day, and a growing number of federal employees are preparing themselves for the next chapter of their lives. Learn how to tackle the challenges that today's workforce faces in laying the groundwork for a smooth and secure retirement.

  • Sponsored by Hewlett Packard Enterprise

    Cyber Defense 101: Arming the Next Generation of Government Employees

    Read this issue brief to learn about the sector's most potent challenges in the new cyber landscape and how government organizations are building a robust, threat-aware infrastructure

  • Sponsored by Aquilent

    GBC Issue Brief: Cultivating Digital Services in the Federal Landscape

    Read this GBC issue brief to learn more about the current state of digital services in the government, and how key players are pushing enhancements towards a user-centric approach.


When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.