A Different Future

Big changes in the Future Combat Systems program are altering the Army's acquisition blueprint.

After nearly a decade spent pursuing the ambitious and expensive Future Combat Systems program, Army leaders are going back to the drawing board to redesign many of their long-term modernization plans.

In April, Defense Secretary Robert Gates axed the manned ground vehicle portion of FCS, consisting of eight types of combat vehicles with a common frame and a price tag of $87 billion-or more than half the total FCS cost. Gates has said Army leaders failed to incorporate lessons learned from combat in Iraq and Afghanistan into the plans for the vehicles, which he feared did not provide adequate protection against roadside bombs that terrorists and insurgents have used to wreak havoc on U.S. forces.

Gates also has raised concerns about the FCS contract with Boeing Co. and SAIC, the lead systems integrators that have managed the work being done on the program by many of the defense industry's biggest players.

Nevertheless, the Defense Department chief says he is committed to modernizing the Army, and plans to tap all the money once planned for FCS ground vehicles for the next several years to pay for a new vehicle effort.

"Vehicle modernization is a high priority, the Army's highest priority, and I totally support it," Gates told the Senate Armed Services Committee on May 14.

Many of the Army's top thinkers are spending their summer hunkered down at the service's Training and Doctrine Command at Fort Monroe, Va., to plot a new vision for combat vehicles in the hope of emerging by Labor Day with a blueprint for the vehicles and for launching a new acquisition program next year. Officials also hope to come up with a plan to incorporate the 12,000 mine resistant ambush-protected vehicles rapidly procured during the past several years into their long-term strategy.

At the same time, the service is negotiating termination fees with Boeing and SAIC, which are expected to be "in the hundreds of millions of dollars," Lt. Gen. Ross Thompson, the Army's top acquisition officer, said during a roundtable with reporters on July 1.

In addition to the manned ground vehicles, FCS-originally billed as a "system of systems"-also consisted of unmanned air and ground vehicles and an extensive wireless network linking all the battlefield components. The Army still plans to pursue the other technologies developed under FCS with a series of separate initiatives, according to an acquisition decision memorandum signed by the Pentagon's acquisition chief in June.

The Army intends to make Boeing the prime contractor for the first three brigades to be outfitted with unmanned vehicles and other technologies developed under FCS, Thompson said. But the next four brigades will be competitively bid. A spokesman for the program said the service wants to keep Boeing on-at least initially-to avoid significant delays in developing and fielding technology.

Megan Scully is the defense reporter for CongressDaily.

Click here for the top 25 Army contractors.

Stay up-to-date with federal news alerts and analysis — Sign up for GovExec's email newsletters.
FROM OUR SPONSORS
JOIN THE DISCUSSION
Close [ x ] More from GovExec
 
 

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from GovExec.com.
We think these reports might interest you:

  • Sponsored by G Suite

    Cross-Agency Teamwork, Anytime and Anywhere

    Dan McCrae, director of IT service delivery division, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA)

    Download
  • Data-Centric Security vs. Database-Level Security

    Database-level encryption had its origins in the 1990s and early 2000s in response to very basic risks which largely revolved around the theft of servers, backup tapes and other physical-layer assets. As noted in Verizon’s 2014, Data Breach Investigations Report (DBIR)1, threats today are far more advanced and dangerous.

    Download
  • Federal IT Applications: Assessing Government's Core Drivers

    In order to better understand the current state of external and internal-facing agency workplace applications, Government Business Council (GBC) and Riverbed undertook an in-depth research study of federal employees. Overall, survey findings indicate that federal IT applications still face a gamut of challenges with regard to quality, reliability, and performance management.

    Download
  • PIV- I And Multifactor Authentication: The Best Defense for Federal Government Contractors

    This white paper explores NIST SP 800-171 and why compliance is critical to federal government contractors, especially those that work with the Department of Defense, as well as how leveraging PIV-I credentialing with multifactor authentication can be used as a defense against cyberattacks

    Download
  • Toward A More Innovative Government

    This research study aims to understand how state and local leaders regard their agency’s innovation efforts and what they are doing to overcome the challenges they face in successfully implementing these efforts.

    Download
  • From Volume to Value: UK’s NHS Digital Provides U.S. Healthcare Agencies A Roadmap For Value-Based Payment Models

    The U.S. healthcare industry is rapidly moving away from traditional fee-for-service models and towards value-based purchasing that reimburses physicians for quality of care in place of frequency of care.

    Download
  • GBC Flash Poll: Is Your Agency Safe?

    Federal leaders weigh in on the state of information security

    Download

When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.