Mission Overload

Homeland Security's broad responsibilities spread contract dollars and controversy.

Homeland Security Department officials often describe DHS' mission as one of protecting the nation from dangerous people and dangerous goods, and then responding effectively if there's a failure in that protection. But the mission really is much broader and deeper. The department also is charged with responding to oil spills, ensuring a legal workforce, facilitating cross-border trade, providing services to immigrants and securing cyberspace. That's a lot to do for a department that just turned five and has a discretionary budget of about $35 billion. DHS officials have requested $38 billion in discretionary funds for fiscal 2009, but Congress has yet to approve that sum.

Not surprisingly, a department whose mission requires it to be all things to all people is going to generate a lot of disappointment. Depending on their constituencies, lawmakers either criticize Homeland Security officials for impeding trade, transportation and legal immigration with ill-conceived or poorly executed programs, or charge them with jeopardizing national security with lax border and transportation security and ineffective immigration enforcement methods.

As such, Homeland Security has invested billions of dollars in technology programs aimed at securing the border (the Secure Border Initiative network, its REAL ID effort), vetting people and goods entering the country (US VISIT, the Western Hemisphere Travel Initiative, various cargo screening programs), verifying the employment eligibility of job seekers (E-Verify) and validating the status of workers in key fields such as transportation (Transportation Worker Identification Credential program). Every one of those programs has generated controversy. Lawmakers and the public have expressed concerns about the department's ability to balance privacy and security, and-in the case of SBInet-its ability to oversee contractors SAIC and Boeing Co. and hold them accountable for meeting complex contract requirements.

Homeland Security also has been buying ships and aircraft, mainly through the overstretched Coast Guard, which plans to spend $24 billion during the next two decades to recapitalize its aging fleet and communications assets. Structural problems with some patrol boats acquired under the program in late 2006 and concerns about security requirements for communications equipment aboard vessels have contributed to apprehension about the service's ability to oversee such a technically complex contract. The program, known as Deepwater, had been managed jointly by Lockheed Martin Corp. and Northrop Grumman Corp. through their Integrated Coast Guard Systems consortium. But Commandant Adm. Thad Allen last year overhauled the service's acquisitions office and forced the contractors to cede their role of lead systems integrator back to the Coast Guard.

Another area of spending that has proved controversial is Homeland Security's grant programs for state and local first-responder organizations. For fiscal 2009, the Bush administration has requested about $2.2 billion for grants to first responders, cities, seaports, emergency fire and medical personnel and other groups, but before the budget request had even landed on lawmakers' desks many complained that DHS was shortchanging state and local personnel. Last year, Congress increased the department's request for grant funding by more than $1.5 billion, and it appears poised to do the same again in 2009.

Stay up-to-date with federal news alerts and analysis — Sign up for GovExec's email newsletters.
Close [ x ] More from GovExec

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from GovExec.com.
We think these reports might interest you:

  • Sponsored by G Suite

    Cross-Agency Teamwork, Anytime and Anywhere

    Dan McCrae, director of IT service delivery division, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA)

  • Data-Centric Security vs. Database-Level Security

    Database-level encryption had its origins in the 1990s and early 2000s in response to very basic risks which largely revolved around the theft of servers, backup tapes and other physical-layer assets. As noted in Verizon’s 2014, Data Breach Investigations Report (DBIR)1, threats today are far more advanced and dangerous.

  • Sponsored by One Identity

    One Nation Under Guard: Securing User Identities Across State and Local Government

    In 2016, the government can expect even more sophisticated threats on the horizon, making it all the more imperative that agencies enforce proper identity and access management (IAM) practices. In order to better measure the current state of IAM at the state and local level, Government Business Council (GBC) conducted an in-depth research study of state and local employees.

  • Sponsored by Aquilent

    The Next Federal Evolution of Cloud

    This GBC report explains the evolution of cloud computing in federal government, and provides an outlook for the future of the cloud in government IT.

  • Sponsored by LTC Partners, administrators of the Federal Long Term Care Insurance Program

    Approaching the Brink of Federal Retirement

    Approximately 10,000 baby boomers are reaching retirement age per day, and a growing number of federal employees are preparing themselves for the next chapter of their lives. Learn how to tackle the challenges that today's workforce faces in laying the groundwork for a smooth and secure retirement.

  • Sponsored by Hewlett Packard Enterprise

    Cyber Defense 101: Arming the Next Generation of Government Employees

    Read this issue brief to learn about the sector's most potent challenges in the new cyber landscape and how government organizations are building a robust, threat-aware infrastructure

  • Sponsored by Aquilent

    GBC Issue Brief: Cultivating Digital Services in the Federal Landscape

    Read this GBC issue brief to learn more about the current state of digital services in the government, and how key players are pushing enhancements towards a user-centric approach.


When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.