Mission Overload

Homeland Security's broad responsibilities spread contract dollars and controversy.

Homeland Security Department officials often describe DHS' mission as one of protecting the nation from dangerous people and dangerous goods, and then responding effectively if there's a failure in that protection. But the mission really is much broader and deeper. The department also is charged with responding to oil spills, ensuring a legal workforce, facilitating cross-border trade, providing services to immigrants and securing cyberspace. That's a lot to do for a department that just turned five and has a discretionary budget of about $35 billion. DHS officials have requested $38 billion in discretionary funds for fiscal 2009, but Congress has yet to approve that sum.

Not surprisingly, a department whose mission requires it to be all things to all people is going to generate a lot of disappointment. Depending on their constituencies, lawmakers either criticize Homeland Security officials for impeding trade, transportation and legal immigration with ill-conceived or poorly executed programs, or charge them with jeopardizing national security with lax border and transportation security and ineffective immigration enforcement methods.

As such, Homeland Security has invested billions of dollars in technology programs aimed at securing the border (the Secure Border Initiative network, its REAL ID effort), vetting people and goods entering the country (US VISIT, the Western Hemisphere Travel Initiative, various cargo screening programs), verifying the employment eligibility of job seekers (E-Verify) and validating the status of workers in key fields such as transportation (Transportation Worker Identification Credential program). Every one of those programs has generated controversy. Lawmakers and the public have expressed concerns about the department's ability to balance privacy and security, and-in the case of SBInet-its ability to oversee contractors SAIC and Boeing Co. and hold them accountable for meeting complex contract requirements.

Homeland Security also has been buying ships and aircraft, mainly through the overstretched Coast Guard, which plans to spend $24 billion during the next two decades to recapitalize its aging fleet and communications assets. Structural problems with some patrol boats acquired under the program in late 2006 and concerns about security requirements for communications equipment aboard vessels have contributed to apprehension about the service's ability to oversee such a technically complex contract. The program, known as Deepwater, had been managed jointly by Lockheed Martin Corp. and Northrop Grumman Corp. through their Integrated Coast Guard Systems consortium. But Commandant Adm. Thad Allen last year overhauled the service's acquisitions office and forced the contractors to cede their role of lead systems integrator back to the Coast Guard.

Another area of spending that has proved controversial is Homeland Security's grant programs for state and local first-responder organizations. For fiscal 2009, the Bush administration has requested about $2.2 billion for grants to first responders, cities, seaports, emergency fire and medical personnel and other groups, but before the budget request had even landed on lawmakers' desks many complained that DHS was shortchanging state and local personnel. Last year, Congress increased the department's request for grant funding by more than $1.5 billion, and it appears poised to do the same again in 2009.

Stay up-to-date with federal news alerts and analysis — Sign up for GovExec's email newsletters.
Close [ x ] More from GovExec

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from GovExec.com.
We think these reports might interest you:

  • Forecasting Cloud's Future

    Conversations with Federal, State, and Local Technology Leaders on Cloud-Driven Digital Transformation

  • The Big Data Campaign Trail

    With everyone so focused on security following recent breaches at federal, state and local government and education institutions, there has been little emphasis on the need for better operations. This report breaks down some of the biggest operational challenges in IT management and provides insight into how agencies and leaders can successfully solve some of the biggest lingering government IT issues.

  • Communicating Innovation in Federal Government

    Federal Government spending on ‘obsolete technology’ continues to increase. Supporting the twin pillars of improved digital service delivery for citizens on the one hand, and the increasingly optimized and flexible working practices for federal employees on the other, are neither easy nor inexpensive tasks. This whitepaper explores how federal agencies can leverage the value of existing agency technology assets while offering IT leaders the ability to implement the kind of employee productivity, citizen service improvements and security demanded by federal oversight.

  • IT Transformation Trends: Flash Storage as a Strategic IT Asset

    MIT Technology Review: Flash Storage As a Strategic IT Asset For the first time in decades, IT leaders now consider all-flash storage as a strategic IT asset. IT has become a new operating model that enables self-service with high performance, density and resiliency. It also offers the self-service agility of the public cloud combined with the security, performance, and cost-effectiveness of a private cloud. Download this MIT Technology Review paper to learn more about how all-flash storage is transforming the data center.

  • Ongoing Efforts in Veterans Health Care Modernization

    This report discusses the current state of veterans health care


When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.