In the Crosshairs

Stepped-up congressional oversight and the upcoming transition have created a hectic time for civilian contracting offices.

When Democrats took control of Congress in 2006, they pledged major changes in government contracting.

Mission accomplished.

The pressure of congressional oversight, coupled with the upcoming presidential election and transition, has radically transformed the acquisition landscape. Several large firms have had to regroup or to leave the government marketplace.

Virtually every major civilian contracting office ended up in Congress' crosshairs during the past year.

The State Department become a lightning rod for criticism after guards for one of its security contractors, Blackwater Worldwide, opened fire in a Baghdad square in September 2007, killing 17 civilians and injuring two dozen. Despite charges of inadequate oversight, State renewed its contract with Blackwater.

The Homeland Security Department faced complaints about how it calculated the number of contracts going to small businesses, cost and schedule overruns on its electronic border fence and spotty implementation of its Transportation Worker Identification Credential program.

Contracting oversight also might have led, in part, to the dismissal of three high-ranking administration officials. The Census Bureau's deputy director Jay Waite stepped down in May after his plan to use handheld computers developed by a private contractor for the 2010 Census was scrapped due to major delays and ballooning costs. Housing and Urban Development Secretary Alphonso Jackson was forced out after criminal investigators raised concerns about favoritism in HUD contracts. And General Services Administration head Lurita A. Doan was fired, in part, over questions about contract interference.

Setbacks also surfaced at agencies relying on competitive sourcing to reduce costs. The 2008 Defense authorization bill prohibited public-private sector job competitions at the Labor Department, Bureau of Prisons, Army Corps of Engineers and Forest Service. Nonetheless, the Bush administration touted the success of the program, noting that the 4,000 competitions conducted in fiscal 2007 would yield nearly $400 million in savings.

The administration made incremental progress in building up the acquisition workforce, adding more than 2,500 employees in fiscal 2007. Skeptics, however, argued that workforce growth has failed to keep pace with federal contract spending.

Even more change will be in store for procurement offices as a trifecta of major contracting bills gets closer to passage. The Senate will be considering three bills that passed the House in April aimed at increasing transparency and avoiding waste, fraud and abuse. The bills would create a governmentwide database of contractor performance and misconduct; bar tax-cheating companies from winning contracts and force some large contractors to disclose the salaries of their highest paid employees.

As agencies gear up for the first presidential transition in eight years, procurement reform will remain a source of debate.

Stay up-to-date with federal news alerts and analysis — Sign up for GovExec's email newsletters.
FROM OUR SPONSORS
JOIN THE DISCUSSION
Close [ x ] More from GovExec
 
 

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from GovExec.com.
We think these reports might interest you:

  • Sponsored by G Suite

    Cross-Agency Teamwork, Anytime and Anywhere

    Dan McCrae, director of IT service delivery division, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA)

    Download
  • Data-Centric Security vs. Database-Level Security

    Database-level encryption had its origins in the 1990s and early 2000s in response to very basic risks which largely revolved around the theft of servers, backup tapes and other physical-layer assets. As noted in Verizon’s 2014, Data Breach Investigations Report (DBIR)1, threats today are far more advanced and dangerous.

    Download
  • Federal IT Applications: Assessing Government's Core Drivers

    In order to better understand the current state of external and internal-facing agency workplace applications, Government Business Council (GBC) and Riverbed undertook an in-depth research study of federal employees. Overall, survey findings indicate that federal IT applications still face a gamut of challenges with regard to quality, reliability, and performance management.

    Download
  • PIV- I And Multifactor Authentication: The Best Defense for Federal Government Contractors

    This white paper explores NIST SP 800-171 and why compliance is critical to federal government contractors, especially those that work with the Department of Defense, as well as how leveraging PIV-I credentialing with multifactor authentication can be used as a defense against cyberattacks

    Download
  • Toward A More Innovative Government

    This research study aims to understand how state and local leaders regard their agency’s innovation efforts and what they are doing to overcome the challenges they face in successfully implementing these efforts.

    Download
  • From Volume to Value: UK’s NHS Digital Provides U.S. Healthcare Agencies A Roadmap For Value-Based Payment Models

    The U.S. healthcare industry is rapidly moving away from traditional fee-for-service models and towards value-based purchasing that reimburses physicians for quality of care in place of frequency of care.

    Download
  • GBC Flash Poll: Is Your Agency Safe?

    Federal leaders weigh in on the state of information security

    Download

When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.