No-Bid Worries

DHS finds itself defending companies that get its contracts.

If the Homeland Security Department's procurement focus in fiscal 2005 was rebuilding the Gulf Coast region after the devastating effects of Hurricane Katrina, then much of its efforts in fiscal 2006 could be described as addressing post-Katrina contracting problems.

One of those areas is no-bid contracts, or awards with less than full and open competition. Nearly half the department's contract awards in fiscal 2005 were sole-source, no-bid procurements, according to Rep. Bennie Thompson, D-Miss. DHS puts that figure at 38 percent. Although the expediency required by sudden emergencies such as hurricanes Katrina and Rita represent the most persuasive case for fewer competitive awards, that sort of acquisition leaves the government vulnerable to wasteful and abusive contracting arrangements, auditors say. That certainly proved true in the case of some Katrina recovery contracts. Federal agents are investigating 11,000 cases of potential fraud, though that figure includes thousands of cases of suspect aid claims by individuals.

In particular, some on Capitol Hill have focused on the issue of awarding contracts to companies with dubious or checkered pasts. The company hired to recover bodies in Louisiana is owned by a corporation sued for mishandling bodies in Florida. A Texas firm hired to provide ambulances had been beset with legal and financial troubles before the hurricanes hit. The Washington nonprofit watchdog Project on Government Oversight says three of the four top Katrina contractors have 37 instances of past misconduct among them.

Industry representatives say those figures are inflated and include cases in which the company was never found to have done anything wrong. Still, the fiscal 2008 Homeland Security authorization bill would require contractors to certify that they are not late on taxes and to disclose any role in creating part of the contract vehicle, which could be a conflict of interest.

One of the most frequently cited causes of wasteful and fraudulent contracts is Homeland Security's continuing shortage of qualified procurement personnel, which has attracted the attention of auditors and others since the department's formation in 2003. In particular, DHS' Office of Procurement Operations, created to handle contracts for the agencies that did not bring their own procurement shops to DHS, continues to employ fewer people than many say are needed. The department's chief procurement officer, Elaine Duke, says building the acquisition workforce is her top priority.

The dearth of contract officers leads to other practices that can be problematic. One is interagency contracting-purchasing goods and services from another agency's pre-established contracts, for a fee.

DHS says about $6 billion of its $22 billion in obligations for fiscal 2006 went to other agencies in the form of these kinds of agreements. The personnel shortage also can lead to hiring contractors or paying private sector firms to help DHS devise and manage programs.

These lead systems integrator contracts are fraught with their own perils, evidenced by the glaring problems uncovered this year in Deepwater, the Coast Guard's fleet modernization acquisition. In addition to escalating costs and delayed timelines, some of the new patrol boats built by the contractor were found to be unseaworthy. The Coast Guard since has taken much of the program management away from the contractor, and its new consolidated procurement directorate-a change initiated before many of the Deepwater problems were revealed-began operations in July. Still, some on Capitol Hill think the agency's changes do not go far enough. One House bill would require the Coast Guard to remove the contractor, a partnership between Lockheed Martin Corp. and Northrop Grumman Corp., by 2011 or earlier if DHS certified that was possible.

Stay up-to-date with federal news alerts and analysis — Sign up for GovExec's email newsletters.
Close [ x ] More from GovExec

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from
We think these reports might interest you:

  • Forecasting Cloud's Future

    Conversations with Federal, State, and Local Technology Leaders on Cloud-Driven Digital Transformation

  • The Big Data Campaign Trail

    With everyone so focused on security following recent breaches at federal, state and local government and education institutions, there has been little emphasis on the need for better operations. This report breaks down some of the biggest operational challenges in IT management and provides insight into how agencies and leaders can successfully solve some of the biggest lingering government IT issues.

  • Communicating Innovation in Federal Government

    Federal Government spending on ‘obsolete technology’ continues to increase. Supporting the twin pillars of improved digital service delivery for citizens on the one hand, and the increasingly optimized and flexible working practices for federal employees on the other, are neither easy nor inexpensive tasks. This whitepaper explores how federal agencies can leverage the value of existing agency technology assets while offering IT leaders the ability to implement the kind of employee productivity, citizen service improvements and security demanded by federal oversight.

  • IT Transformation Trends: Flash Storage as a Strategic IT Asset

    MIT Technology Review: Flash Storage As a Strategic IT Asset For the first time in decades, IT leaders now consider all-flash storage as a strategic IT asset. IT has become a new operating model that enables self-service with high performance, density and resiliency. It also offers the self-service agility of the public cloud combined with the security, performance, and cost-effectiveness of a private cloud. Download this MIT Technology Review paper to learn more about how all-flash storage is transforming the data center.

  • Ongoing Efforts in Veterans Health Care Modernization

    This report discusses the current state of veterans health care


When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.