Armed For Audits

Pete Maraovitch/Newscom

For want of an invoice, the battle was lost. The battle in this case is the Pentagon’s long-term quest for auditable books. But no one is giving up the fight. The congressional deadline for overhauling military accounts is 2017, and Defense Department leaders aim to achieve it three years earlier.

Much of the onus rests on Robert Hale, the Pentagon’s deputy under-secretary, comptroller and chief financial officer, who knows as well as anyone that the public can tolerate only so many stories about billions of Defense contractor dollars unaccounted for in, say, Afghanistan. “We haven’t had auditable statements for decades,” Hale says, “and I don’t think we’ll ever persuade the public we’re reliable stewards of their money if we can’t pass a test required of every viable corporation.”
 
Defense’s bookkeeping shortfalls have been on the Government Accountability Office’s list of high-risk programs since the mid-1990s. GAO’s most recent report, in April, criticized the department for failing to mobilize all committees and managers to comply with audit guidance, and for submitting premature reports of statement readiness. 
 
The challenge is complicated by sheer volume—the Pentagon in 2011 processed nearly 172 million financial transactions—and the services vary in their progress on adhering to the department’s Financial Improvement Audit Readiness plan. 
 
In an Oct. 13, 2011, memo to Pentagon civilian leaders and brass, Hale called for an “all hands” effort to improve business practices, not only to comply with legal requirements but also to aid in decision-making.
 
“We do know where we’re spending what Congress gives us,” Hale is quick to point out. If the department were off by just 5 percent, “there’d be 7 million or 8 million wrong payments to vendors and massive violations of the Anti-Deficiency Act—and we don’t see any of that happening,” he says. “But we owe it to the public to document what we do, and sometimes our business practices are not as good as they need to be.”
 
The solution comes down to what football strategists call “simple blocking and tackling, a matter of doing well what we’re supposed to be doing every day,” Hale says. Outside vendors that perform work must submit an invoice and receipts, and the receiving agency must have a report describing the amounts agreed to in a contract. But in the rush of more inspiring tasks, steps get skipped, Hale acknowledges. Supervisors have to say, “Sign the form please, I know you’re busy, but get the form filled out,” he says. “This is something that’s now important.” 
 
The services are at different places on these issues, according to Hale, who has served as comptroller of the Air Force, executive director of the AmericanSociety of Military Comptrollers, and national security specialist at the Congressional Budget Office. The Navy got started earlier and is further along—the Marines in particular—he notes. “The Army and Air Force are catching up fast and benefit from learning,” Hale says. “The Marines get asked to take a beachhead; now they’re taking a financial beachhead for us.”
 
Hale has been unafraid to seek help from private accounting firms—the Big Four and some smaller partners. “They have more practical expertise and experts who’ve been working with other agencies,” he says. The companies perform small-scale examinations and mock audits, along with staff from the Defense Inspector General’s Office. “Sometimes the audits pass, and sometimes they say, “Here’s what you didn’t do and what you need to fix it,” Hale says. “Sometimes, they even say we’ve gone a step further than needed.”
 
A major part of the remedy is new information technology, which is superior to older systems at retaining historical and detailed data rather than mere aggregate numbers, Hale says. Modern software also allows for instant retrieval of data, which is essential when auditors want statements in a hurry.
 
Oversight from Congress relative to the holy grail of clean books is “appropriate and part of our system,” Hale says, noting this endorsement is “not exactly a wish to have more because it takes a fair amount of time.” Years ago, the attention came from a variety of panels, but now it’s mostly the committees of jurisdiction, Hale says. That’s important, “particularly as we go through the inevitable change in personnel—no matter who wins the November election, Congress can make sure there is a continuity of effort,” he adds.
 
A key colleague of Hale’s is Beth McGrath, the Pentagon’s deputy chief management officer, with whom he chairs the Financial Improvement Audit Readiness Governance Board. “The rough division of labor is that she concentrates on efforts to install new [IT] systems, which is hard and needs to happen, while I concentrate on the overall process,” Hale says.
 
A separate but related component under Hale’s purview is the Defense Contract Audit Agency, which focuses on financial statements for private companies under contract with the department. That agency’s constituents are Pentagon contracting officers. “One way DCAA contributes,” he says, “is when we need to close a contract and make a final payment. DCAA performs an incurred cost audit, which says we’re ready to go so that the deputy chief management officer can finish it up.” It is not by accident, Hale adds, that two components reporting to him—DCAA and the Defense Finance and Accounting Service—have produced auditable books.
 
Soon after Leon Panetta took over as Defense secretary in July 2011, he let it be known he wanted departmentwide auditability earlier than the deadline—by 2014. “It’s a stretch goal, but the right thing to do,” Hale says. “We need to push ourselves to get there, and his personal endorsement is helpful pressure.”
 
During their near daily meetings, Panetta regularly brings up the problem, Hale adds, “despite all the other issues, like Syria and North Korea, on his mind.” Panetta’s nudge has “opened a lot of doors for us, and that point of view has permeated the organization,” Hale says. “My job is to leverage and make full use of it.”
Stay up-to-date with federal news alerts and analysis — Sign up for GovExec's email newsletters.
FROM OUR SPONSORS
JOIN THE DISCUSSION
Close [ x ] More from GovExec
 
 

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from GovExec.com.
We think these reports might interest you:

  • Sponsored by G Suite

    Cross-Agency Teamwork, Anytime and Anywhere

    Dan McCrae, director of IT service delivery division, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA)

    Download
  • Data-Centric Security vs. Database-Level Security

    Database-level encryption had its origins in the 1990s and early 2000s in response to very basic risks which largely revolved around the theft of servers, backup tapes and other physical-layer assets. As noted in Verizon’s 2014, Data Breach Investigations Report (DBIR)1, threats today are far more advanced and dangerous.

    Download
  • Federal IT Applications: Assessing Government's Core Drivers

    In order to better understand the current state of external and internal-facing agency workplace applications, Government Business Council (GBC) and Riverbed undertook an in-depth research study of federal employees. Overall, survey findings indicate that federal IT applications still face a gamut of challenges with regard to quality, reliability, and performance management.

    Download
  • PIV- I And Multifactor Authentication: The Best Defense for Federal Government Contractors

    This white paper explores NIST SP 800-171 and why compliance is critical to federal government contractors, especially those that work with the Department of Defense, as well as how leveraging PIV-I credentialing with multifactor authentication can be used as a defense against cyberattacks

    Download
  • Toward A More Innovative Government

    This research study aims to understand how state and local leaders regard their agency’s innovation efforts and what they are doing to overcome the challenges they face in successfully implementing these efforts.

    Download
  • From Volume to Value: UK’s NHS Digital Provides U.S. Healthcare Agencies A Roadmap For Value-Based Payment Models

    The U.S. healthcare industry is rapidly moving away from traditional fee-for-service models and towards value-based purchasing that reimburses physicians for quality of care in place of frequency of care.

    Download
  • GBC Flash Poll: Is Your Agency Safe?

    Federal leaders weigh in on the state of information security

    Download

When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.