Ethics Enforcer

Matt Reres helped Defense officials negotiate the fine line between sanction and scandal.

During the first Gulf War, the Army wanted to land helicopters in the desert without blowing sand back up into their turbines. Helipads would have to be built, ASAP. Matt Reres, the civilian deputy general counsel of ethics and fiscal policy, the final authority on both matters for the Army, wondered where he could find the funding. By approving money, not from military construction appropriations but from a budget line that qualified the pads as temporary structures by judging that they were not "long term," he managed a fiscal sleight of hand. The pads were built.

"Fortunately, a lot of people agreed with that one; otherwise I wouldn't be sitting here," he says, chuckling about one of his more "innovative" decisions.

Reres, 65, says he's thankful he never had to arbitrate a serious ethical misadventure before retiring in 2007. Whether during Republican or Democratic administrations, the executives he counseled wanted to stay out of hot water, especially when it came to the media. "With The Washington Post over there, you're spending all your time responding to their queries, instead of getting on with your job. Who needs that hassle?" he says.

Federal code sets out 14 principles of ethical conduct, and they apply to everyone in the executive branch, says Reres. After becoming deputy counsel for ethics in 1993, he decided that a cautious rule of thumb would be to best keep the reputations of the higher-ups untarnished.

"I wanted to be conservative," Reres says, "because in effect the rules, as far as I'm concerned, are the last point before you fall over the edge. I didn't want the Army to stand too close to the precipice."

Reres recalls counseling one political appointee-who had extravagant taste in office furniture and wanted to accept rides on privately owned jets-that avoiding even the appearance of impropriety was paramount. That's the 14th principle. But the appointee, not thrilled by the advice, hotly complained to Reres' boss.

"He went to the general counsel and said, 'This guy's judgment is wrong. You should get rid of him,' " Reres laughs, adding that the appointee apparently believed ethical standards were negotiable. "I couldn't believe it."

Reres retired from the Army in 2000 after a 31-year career in the active-duty ranks and the Reserve. He entered government as the chief of the Defense Department's tax, property and law branch in 1977, eventually joining the Senior Executive Service in 1989. Of all his work, perhaps he's most pleased with leading the establishment of the Pentagon's electronic Financial Disclosure Filing System in the 1990s, to capture, track and flag the financial disclosures of senior executives.

"Some men are like rivers," Reres sometimes likes to say. "They choose the path of least resistance and become crooked."

Stay up-to-date with federal news alerts and analysis — Sign up for GovExec's email newsletters.
Close [ x ] More from GovExec

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from
We think these reports might interest you:

  • Sponsored by Brocade

    Best of 2016 Federal Forum eBook

    Earlier this summer, Federal and tech industry leaders convened to talk security, machine learning, network modernization, DevOps, and much more at the 2016 Federal Forum. This eBook includes a useful summary highlighting the best content shared at the 2016 Federal Forum to help agencies modernize their network infrastructure.

  • Sponsored by CDW-G

    GBC Flash Poll Series: Merger & Acquisitions

    Download this GBC Flash Poll to learn more about federal perspectives on the impact of industry consolidation.

  • Sponsored by One Identity

    One Nation Under Guard: Securing User Identities Across State and Local Government

    In 2016, the government can expect even more sophisticated threats on the horizon, making it all the more imperative that agencies enforce proper identity and access management (IAM) practices. In order to better measure the current state of IAM at the state and local level, Government Business Council (GBC) conducted an in-depth research study of state and local employees.

  • Sponsored by Aquilent

    The Next Federal Evolution of Cloud

    This GBC report explains the evolution of cloud computing in federal government, and provides an outlook for the future of the cloud in government IT.

  • Sponsored by Aquilent

    A DevOps Roadmap for the Federal Government

    This GBC Report discusses how DevOps is steadily gaining traction among some of government's leading IT developers and agencies.

  • Sponsored by LTC Partners, administrators of the Federal Long Term Care Insurance Program

    Approaching the Brink of Federal Retirement

    Approximately 10,000 baby boomers are reaching retirement age per day, and a growing number of federal employees are preparing themselves for the next chapter of their lives. Learn how to tackle the challenges that today's workforce faces in laying the groundwork for a smooth and secure retirement.

  • Sponsored by Hewlett Packard Enterprise

    Cyber Defense 101: Arming the Next Generation of Government Employees

    Read this issue brief to learn about the sector's most potent challenges in the new cyber landscape and how government organizations are building a robust, threat-aware infrastructure

  • Sponsored by Aquilent

    GBC Issue Brief: Cultivating Digital Services in the Federal Landscape

    Read this GBC issue brief to learn more about the current state of digital services in the government, and how key players are pushing enhancements towards a user-centric approach.

  • Sponsored by CDW-G

    Joint Enterprise Licensing Agreements

    Read this eBook to learn how defense agencies can achieve savings and efficiencies with an Enterprise Software Agreement.

  • Sponsored by Cloudera

    Government Forum Content Library

    Get all the essential resources needed for effective technology strategies in the federal landscape.


When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.