Citizens to Feds: Mind Your Own Business

a t a recent Washington conference on customer relationship management for the public sector, privacy fears lit up the discussion.

As a presenter extolled the virtues of CRM software, which for years has allowed companies like airlines and banks to identify their most lucrative customers and cater to them with special services, a government employee in the front row raised his hand to respond to the notion that agencies should capitalize on the mountains of data they have about citizens, share it with each other and use it to provide top-notch customer service.

"We all work for the government," the employee said. "Do we really trust the government with our private information?" Cries of "No!" erupted across the room.

CRM has privacy advocates' hair afire. House Majority Leader Richard Armey, R-Texas, recently issued a joint statement with the American Civil Liberties Union condemning government's encroachment on people's private lives, decrying "a troubling expansion in the way technology is being used in the surveillance of ordinary Americans." The Coalition for Constitutional Liberties, composed largely of privacy advocacy groups and conservative political organizations, says "too often government record-keeping requirements can contribute, directly or indirectly, to private sector abuses of Americans' privacy."

The advantage for agencies in using the data they collect on citizens is better customer service, says Marsha Rydstrom, acting chief information officer at the Social Security Administration, which is planning a CRM pilot project. Agencies looking for gold stars from Congress and the public feel that improving service is the way to go, and the more they know about their customers, the better they can inform citizens about what services are available. But how receptive will citizens be to receiving, say, an e-mail about survivors benefits with the subject heading, "Sorry to hear about the loss of your father/mother"?

Phil Talksy, senior product marketing manager for Remedy, a CRM vendor, says agencies could share data in "discrete components" to eliminate redundancies in work without having to give away everything. After all, why should Social Security and the IRS collect and maintain the same information about every citizen?

But privacy zealots cry foul at such a notion. Wayne Crews, director of technology studies at the Cato Institute, a libertarian think tank in Washington, says the public is required to give the government most of the information it wants-there's no opt-out feature. "Do you want to automate . . . in the name of e-government and efficiency if it's something people would prefer not be done?" he asks. Agencies trying out CRM technology hear many of the same complaints from their own employees. Tim Vigotsky, director of the Interior Department's National Business Center, says that when his agency began a pilot project to put all personnel records and payroll information online, employees grew wary. "There's a percentage of the employees that are very, very concerned . . . and have fairly loudly voiced those concerns," he says.

Those employees aren't alone. A recent survey by the polling firm Hart-Teeter for the Council for Excellence in Government found a majority of Americans believe e-government's long-term impact will be positive. But more than half of all Americans harbor fears that a government employee might misuse their personal information.

Stay up-to-date with federal news alerts and analysis — Sign up for GovExec's email newsletters.
Close [ x ] More from GovExec

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from
We think these reports might interest you:

  • Sponsored by G Suite

    Cross-Agency Teamwork, Anytime and Anywhere

    Dan McCrae, director of IT service delivery division, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA)

  • Data-Centric Security vs. Database-Level Security

    Database-level encryption had its origins in the 1990s and early 2000s in response to very basic risks which largely revolved around the theft of servers, backup tapes and other physical-layer assets. As noted in Verizon’s 2014, Data Breach Investigations Report (DBIR)1, threats today are far more advanced and dangerous.

  • Sponsored by One Identity

    One Nation Under Guard: Securing User Identities Across State and Local Government

    In 2016, the government can expect even more sophisticated threats on the horizon, making it all the more imperative that agencies enforce proper identity and access management (IAM) practices. In order to better measure the current state of IAM at the state and local level, Government Business Council (GBC) conducted an in-depth research study of state and local employees.

  • Sponsored by Aquilent

    The Next Federal Evolution of Cloud

    This GBC report explains the evolution of cloud computing in federal government, and provides an outlook for the future of the cloud in government IT.

  • Sponsored by LTC Partners, administrators of the Federal Long Term Care Insurance Program

    Approaching the Brink of Federal Retirement

    Approximately 10,000 baby boomers are reaching retirement age per day, and a growing number of federal employees are preparing themselves for the next chapter of their lives. Learn how to tackle the challenges that today's workforce faces in laying the groundwork for a smooth and secure retirement.

  • Sponsored by Hewlett Packard Enterprise

    Cyber Defense 101: Arming the Next Generation of Government Employees

    Read this issue brief to learn about the sector's most potent challenges in the new cyber landscape and how government organizations are building a robust, threat-aware infrastructure

  • Sponsored by Aquilent

    GBC Issue Brief: Cultivating Digital Services in the Federal Landscape

    Read this GBC issue brief to learn more about the current state of digital services in the government, and how key players are pushing enhancements towards a user-centric approach.


When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.