Battling Over CIO Power

Battle lines are being drawn over how agencies shape the chief information officer (CIO) job. A recent General Accounting Office report (GAO/AIMD-96-78) demonstrates that congressional auditors interpret the 1996 Information Technology Management Reform Act (ITMRA) as a mandate for strong, highly placed CIOs with budget authority and broad responsibilities. Equally clear from the study, which analyzed NASA's chief information officer, is that agencies may disagree with GAO's assessment of how to apportion authority and responsibility among senior managers and the
chief information officer.

NASA has admitted to long-standing problems with redundant, overlapping, unintegrated and obsolete information systems. GAO has said the agency's "culture of autonomy and decentralization" prevents efficient and cost-effective IT operations. These criticisms, combined with NASA's plan to cut IT spending by $400 million between fiscal 1997 and 2000, led the agency to appoint a CIO in 1995. Supporting the CIO were a deputy, a staff of six and 23 CIOs at NASA headquarters and field centers.

The study finds the CIO was hobbled by NASA's stubborn insistence on dispersing power. For example, to stay "customer-focused," the 23 center CIOs had to report to their local managers as well as serve the CIO. To maintain "friendly tension," the CIO was forced to reach memoranda of understanding with centers rather than give them orders. Nor was the CIO given control of any part of NASA's budget, permitted to join in program decisions, or allowed to make IT investment decisions.

In spite of these limits, GAO acknowledges the CIO took "important first steps" to improve IT management, among them directing consolidation of shared information technology infrastructure at Marshall Space Flight Center, Ala.

Since ITMRA's enactment, NASA has created a CIO Council and taken steps to improve IT policy-making, investments and coordination. But auditors still find NASA's technology management lacking and its CIO weak. While auditors want the CIO's authority and duties bulked up, NASA touts its CIO as a model for other agencies.

Stay up-to-date with federal news alerts and analysis — Sign up for GovExec's email newsletters.
Close [ x ] More from GovExec

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from
We think these reports might interest you:

  • Sponsored by G Suite

    Cross-Agency Teamwork, Anytime and Anywhere

    Dan McCrae, director of IT service delivery division, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA)

  • Data-Centric Security vs. Database-Level Security

    Database-level encryption had its origins in the 1990s and early 2000s in response to very basic risks which largely revolved around the theft of servers, backup tapes and other physical-layer assets. As noted in Verizon’s 2014, Data Breach Investigations Report (DBIR)1, threats today are far more advanced and dangerous.

  • Federal IT Applications: Assessing Government's Core Drivers

    In order to better understand the current state of external and internal-facing agency workplace applications, Government Business Council (GBC) and Riverbed undertook an in-depth research study of federal employees. Overall, survey findings indicate that federal IT applications still face a gamut of challenges with regard to quality, reliability, and performance management.

  • PIV- I And Multifactor Authentication: The Best Defense for Federal Government Contractors

    This white paper explores NIST SP 800-171 and why compliance is critical to federal government contractors, especially those that work with the Department of Defense, as well as how leveraging PIV-I credentialing with multifactor authentication can be used as a defense against cyberattacks

  • Toward A More Innovative Government

    This research study aims to understand how state and local leaders regard their agency’s innovation efforts and what they are doing to overcome the challenges they face in successfully implementing these efforts.

  • From Volume to Value: UK’s NHS Digital Provides U.S. Healthcare Agencies A Roadmap For Value-Based Payment Models

    The U.S. healthcare industry is rapidly moving away from traditional fee-for-service models and towards value-based purchasing that reimburses physicians for quality of care in place of frequency of care.

  • GBC Flash Poll: Is Your Agency Safe?

    Federal leaders weigh in on the state of information security


When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.