Down Payment on a Technology Revolution

With an administration committed to dramatically trans- forming the U.S. military-and two recent conflicts that showcased the vast potential of American military technology-the armed forces finally seem poised to take flight on the wings of a long-anticipated technological revolution.

Core elements of that revolution, in fact, were on display during the recent Iraqi Freedom campaign: unmanned aerial vehicles; stealth bombers; all-weather bombs and missiles guided by the Global Positioning System; air- and space-borne reconnaissance and surveillance sensors; and computer- and satellite-aided information systems to provide nearly instantaneous command-and-control, communications and intelligence capabilities.

As a down payment on the next phase of that technological revolution, the Bush administration's fiscal 2004 Defense budget request includes $61.8 billion for research and development, a $4.3 billion increase from fiscal 2003.That's the highest level of military R&D spending in U.S. history, and a 42 percent increase over the fiscal 2001 level, even when adjusted for inflation. The administration's R&D spending request is a full 20 percent higher than R&D spending in fiscal 1987, the peak of the Reagan-era defense buildup.

The Pentagon's R&D budget is broken down into six categories, from basic research and early concept development to system demonstrations. Programs in the earliest three phases are contained in the science and technology budget, which many transformation advocates consider the seed-corn account for truly revolutionary advances in military capability. It was in this early phase of research, for instance, that such advances as stealth technology and the Internet were first conceptualized.

Under the administration's new plan, science and technology funding would increase by a modest $1.3 billion, or 10 percent, between fiscal 2001 and fiscal 2004. By comparison, R&D funding for the Missile Defense Agency would increase by $3.5 billion, or 76 percent, in that period, reflecting the administration's high priority on fielding a national missile defense program.

By far the largest increase in the R&D budget is for system development and demonstration, the last and most costly phase of R&D before a system enters production. The administration's plan calls for funding in this area to increase by roughly $7.5 billion between 2001 and 2004, or 81 percent. That reflects the administration's decision to continue with a number of programs that are in late-stage development or initial production, including the Joint Strike Fighter, the F-22 fighter, the Comanche helicopter and the Navy's DD(X) destroyer. The JSF alone will cause funding associated with fighter modernization programs to rise by $3.6 billion between 2001 and 2004.

Transformation advocates fear that this wave of next-generation systems-which also include the V-22 tilt-rotor aircraft and the Army's Interim Armored Vehicle-will overwhelm the R&D budget.

"Perhaps the greatest problem with the administration's decision to move ahead with so many costly traditional programs today is that it might make it impossible to increase funding for more transformational kinds of systems several years down the road, when their potential is better proven," concluded the Center for Strategic and Budgetary Assessments, an independent think tank, in an analysis of the 2004 Defense budget request.

Stay up-to-date with federal news alerts and analysis — Sign up for GovExec's email newsletters.
Close [ x ] More from GovExec

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from
We think these reports might interest you:

  • Going Agile:Revolutionizing Federal Digital Services Delivery

    Here’s one indication that times have changed: Harriet Tubman is going to be the next face of the twenty dollar bill. Another sign of change? The way in which the federal government arrived at that decision.

  • Cyber Risk Report: Cybercrime Trends from 2016

    In our first half 2016 cyber trends report, SurfWatch Labs threat intelligence analysts noted one key theme – the interconnected nature of cybercrime – and the second half of the year saw organizations continuing to struggle with that reality. The number of potential cyber threats, the pool of already compromised information, and the ease of finding increasingly sophisticated cybercriminal tools continued to snowball throughout the year.

  • Featured Content from RSA Conference: Dissed by NIST

    Learn more about the latest draft of the U.S. National Institute of Standards and Technology guidance document on authentication and lifecycle management.

  • GBC Issue Brief: The Future of 9-1-1

    A Look Into the Next Generation of Emergency Services

  • GBC Survey Report: Securing the Perimeters

    A candid survey on cybersecurity in state and local governments

  • The New IP: Moving Government Agencies Toward the Network of The Future

    Federal IT managers are looking to modernize legacy network infrastructures that are taxed by growing demands from mobile devices, video, vast amounts of data, and more. This issue brief discusses the federal government network landscape, as well as market, financial force drivers for network modernization.

  • eBook: State & Local Cybersecurity

    CenturyLink is committed to helping state and local governments meet their cybersecurity challenges. Towards that end, CenturyLink commissioned a study from the Government Business Council that looked at the perceptions, attitudes and experiences of state and local leaders around the cybersecurity issue. The results were surprising in a number of ways. Learn more about their findings and the ways in which state and local governments can combat cybersecurity threats with this eBook.


When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.