Down Payment on a Technology Revolution

With an administration committed to dramatically trans- forming the U.S. military-and two recent conflicts that showcased the vast potential of American military technology-the armed forces finally seem poised to take flight on the wings of a long-anticipated technological revolution.

Core elements of that revolution, in fact, were on display during the recent Iraqi Freedom campaign: unmanned aerial vehicles; stealth bombers; all-weather bombs and missiles guided by the Global Positioning System; air- and space-borne reconnaissance and surveillance sensors; and computer- and satellite-aided information systems to provide nearly instantaneous command-and-control, communications and intelligence capabilities.

As a down payment on the next phase of that technological revolution, the Bush administration's fiscal 2004 Defense budget request includes $61.8 billion for research and development, a $4.3 billion increase from fiscal 2003.That's the highest level of military R&D spending in U.S. history, and a 42 percent increase over the fiscal 2001 level, even when adjusted for inflation. The administration's R&D spending request is a full 20 percent higher than R&D spending in fiscal 1987, the peak of the Reagan-era defense buildup.

The Pentagon's R&D budget is broken down into six categories, from basic research and early concept development to system demonstrations. Programs in the earliest three phases are contained in the science and technology budget, which many transformation advocates consider the seed-corn account for truly revolutionary advances in military capability. It was in this early phase of research, for instance, that such advances as stealth technology and the Internet were first conceptualized.

Under the administration's new plan, science and technology funding would increase by a modest $1.3 billion, or 10 percent, between fiscal 2001 and fiscal 2004. By comparison, R&D funding for the Missile Defense Agency would increase by $3.5 billion, or 76 percent, in that period, reflecting the administration's high priority on fielding a national missile defense program.

By far the largest increase in the R&D budget is for system development and demonstration, the last and most costly phase of R&D before a system enters production. The administration's plan calls for funding in this area to increase by roughly $7.5 billion between 2001 and 2004, or 81 percent. That reflects the administration's decision to continue with a number of programs that are in late-stage development or initial production, including the Joint Strike Fighter, the F-22 fighter, the Comanche helicopter and the Navy's DD(X) destroyer. The JSF alone will cause funding associated with fighter modernization programs to rise by $3.6 billion between 2001 and 2004.

Transformation advocates fear that this wave of next-generation systems-which also include the V-22 tilt-rotor aircraft and the Army's Interim Armored Vehicle-will overwhelm the R&D budget.

"Perhaps the greatest problem with the administration's decision to move ahead with so many costly traditional programs today is that it might make it impossible to increase funding for more transformational kinds of systems several years down the road, when their potential is better proven," concluded the Center for Strategic and Budgetary Assessments, an independent think tank, in an analysis of the 2004 Defense budget request.

Stay up-to-date with federal news alerts and analysis — Sign up for GovExec's email newsletters.
Close [ x ] More from GovExec

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from
We think these reports might interest you:

  • Forecasting Cloud's Future

    Conversations with Federal, State, and Local Technology Leaders on Cloud-Driven Digital Transformation

  • The Big Data Campaign Trail

    With everyone so focused on security following recent breaches at federal, state and local government and education institutions, there has been little emphasis on the need for better operations. This report breaks down some of the biggest operational challenges in IT management and provides insight into how agencies and leaders can successfully solve some of the biggest lingering government IT issues.

  • Communicating Innovation in Federal Government

    Federal Government spending on ‘obsolete technology’ continues to increase. Supporting the twin pillars of improved digital service delivery for citizens on the one hand, and the increasingly optimized and flexible working practices for federal employees on the other, are neither easy nor inexpensive tasks. This whitepaper explores how federal agencies can leverage the value of existing agency technology assets while offering IT leaders the ability to implement the kind of employee productivity, citizen service improvements and security demanded by federal oversight.

  • IT Transformation Trends: Flash Storage as a Strategic IT Asset

    MIT Technology Review: Flash Storage As a Strategic IT Asset For the first time in decades, IT leaders now consider all-flash storage as a strategic IT asset. IT has become a new operating model that enables self-service with high performance, density and resiliency. It also offers the self-service agility of the public cloud combined with the security, performance, and cost-effectiveness of a private cloud. Download this MIT Technology Review paper to learn more about how all-flash storage is transforming the data center.

  • Ongoing Efforts in Veterans Health Care Modernization

    This report discusses the current state of veterans health care


When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.