Patching Holes

Shouldn't top government officials have at least a working knowledge of technology?

In mid-June, the Pentagon was forced to take as many as 1,500 of its computers offline due to the latest in a long line of cyberattacks on military systems. Afterward, Defense Secretary Robert Gates was asked about its effects-for example, whether or not his own e-mail had been affected.

Nope, he responded. "I don't do e-mail. I'm a very low-tech person." The following week, President Bush met with Estonian President Toomas Hendrik Ilves at the White House. After their discussion, Bush said they had "talked about an interesting subject, and one that I can learn a lot about, and that is the cyberattack that makes us all vulnerable." Estonia, he noted, had recently endured a highly publicized wave of such attacks, and was considering setting up a "center of excellence" to share its knowledge.

When the secretary of Defense acknowledges that he works in the technological dark ages, and the president of the United States says he has a thing or two to learn about the potentially crippling effects of cyberattacks, isn't it cause for at least a little concern? After all, we're well over a decade into the Internet revolution. Is it too much to ask at this stage that top federal leaders have at least a working knowledge of technology?

For many, the answer is no. "Why should the head of DoD spend hours fooling with e-mail?" wrote one reader of's Fedblog in response to a post on the issue. "That's what he has office assistants for! I want him to be thinking of the big picture, not wading through volumes of e-mail."

Others responded that Bush, Gates and other leaders have good reason to avoid the trappings of technology. "We now live in a culture of investigate, probe and conjure allegations," wrote one respondent.

"These are the modern strategies of political warfare when there are honest policy debates. The chief weapon in all of this is e-mail traffic."

But Gates didn't say he avoided e-mail because he didn't have the time, or was worried about leaving electronic bread crumbs all over the place. He said he didn't because he's a "very low-tech person." That's a big difference.

Consider that Gates' statement came just a week after Government Executive's Bob Brewin reported that both the Army and the Air Force had issued solicitations seeking industry help in developing the capacity to launch "offensive information operations"-that is, cyberattacks of their own. The very future of U.S. military strategy rests heavily on a new theory of operations known as "network-centric warfare."

Of course, technological literacy is hardly a make-or-break issue for the leaders of the military. Gates and Bush, after all, don't need to be experts on information warfare and the risks of cyberattacks to the United States. That's what they have thousands of employees for. And using e-mail regularly wouldn't give them that expertise anyway.

But it would certainly help them put things in context. And it just might make them more efficient, too. After all, even if you have an assistant to screen your messages, wouldn't it make more sense to have them forwarded to you electronically, rather than printing out and exchanging what must be thousands of pieces of paper?

When it comes to technology, at this stage even the people at the tippy-top of the organizational chart ought to have at least some knowledge of its importance to everyday government operations. It's difficult to imagine that someone who isn't even familiar with how e-mail works would be able to understand the real-world effects of cyberattacks and make informed decisions about how to counter them-and launch your own, if necessary.

If leaders send the message that technology is someone else's problem, they take a very real risk. On the other hand, if they cultivate an interest in and knowledge of technological issues, their efforts will have positive ripple effects down the chain of command. Everybody wants to stay a step ahead of the boss when it comes to technology, just to be able to impress him or her. Why not raise the bar by improving technological literacy-starting at the top.

Stay up-to-date with federal news alerts and analysis — Sign up for GovExec's email newsletters.
Close [ x ] More from GovExec

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from
We think these reports might interest you:

  • Sponsored by G Suite

    Cross-Agency Teamwork, Anytime and Anywhere

    Dan McCrae, director of IT service delivery division, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA)

  • Data-Centric Security vs. Database-Level Security

    Database-level encryption had its origins in the 1990s and early 2000s in response to very basic risks which largely revolved around the theft of servers, backup tapes and other physical-layer assets. As noted in Verizon’s 2014, Data Breach Investigations Report (DBIR)1, threats today are far more advanced and dangerous.

  • Sponsored by One Identity

    One Nation Under Guard: Securing User Identities Across State and Local Government

    In 2016, the government can expect even more sophisticated threats on the horizon, making it all the more imperative that agencies enforce proper identity and access management (IAM) practices. In order to better measure the current state of IAM at the state and local level, Government Business Council (GBC) conducted an in-depth research study of state and local employees.

  • Sponsored by Aquilent

    The Next Federal Evolution of Cloud

    This GBC report explains the evolution of cloud computing in federal government, and provides an outlook for the future of the cloud in government IT.

  • Sponsored by LTC Partners, administrators of the Federal Long Term Care Insurance Program

    Approaching the Brink of Federal Retirement

    Approximately 10,000 baby boomers are reaching retirement age per day, and a growing number of federal employees are preparing themselves for the next chapter of their lives. Learn how to tackle the challenges that today's workforce faces in laying the groundwork for a smooth and secure retirement.

  • Sponsored by Hewlett Packard Enterprise

    Cyber Defense 101: Arming the Next Generation of Government Employees

    Read this issue brief to learn about the sector's most potent challenges in the new cyber landscape and how government organizations are building a robust, threat-aware infrastructure

  • Sponsored by Aquilent

    GBC Issue Brief: Cultivating Digital Services in the Federal Landscape

    Read this GBC issue brief to learn more about the current state of digital services in the government, and how key players are pushing enhancements towards a user-centric approach.


When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.