Fedblog FedblogFedblog
Government Executive Editor in Chief Tom Shoop, along with other editors and staff correspondents, look at the federal bureaucracy from the outside in.
ARCHIVES

Millennials: More Government, Please

Much has been written about the disgust of the millennial generation with the state of the American political system and about how federal agencies haven’t been able to get younger folks to commit to careers in public service.

But this doesn’t apparently translate into a distrust of government generally, or a lack of faith in its ability to deal with the challenges facing the country. A Wall Street Journal/NBC News poll released this week found that fully 60 percent of millennials say government should do more to solve problems, rather than leaving things up to businesses and individuals. Only 37 percent say government shouldn’t shoulder more responsibility.

In contrast, of those aged 35 and older in the survey, only 46 percent say government should do more, while fully half say the public sector is already doing too much.

Part of the issue here is that millennials appear simply to be more liberal than their elders. (In the Wall Street Journal/NBC News poll, they’re the only group with a net positive view of President Obama.) Of course, this doesn’t necessarily mean that millennials are fans of big government. They may just be seeking more...

What ‘Go Set a Watchman’ Tells Us About the Big Government Debate

The literary event of the year is the breathlessly awaited publication of Go Set a Watchman, the prequel to To Kill a Mockingbird.

While the book arrived to mixed reviews, and questions about whether Harper Lee actually wanted it to see the light of day, it is at the very least a literary curiosity. And it accomplishes something unexpected: revealing just how little the debate over the size and role of the federal government has changed in the past five decades.

Go Set a Watchman, which its publisher, HarperCollins, says was originally written in the mid-1950s, centers on the return of Mockingbird’s Scout, now known as Jean-Louise, to her Georgia birthplace. There she discovers that the burgeoning national debate over race relations is playing out in her own family in ways that leave her deeply disillusioned -- particularly in her father, Atticus.

But it’s another character, Atticus’ brother and Jean-Louise’s uncle, Jack Finch, who puts the civil rights debate in the broader context of attitudes toward government. About two-thirds of the way through the book, he delivers a lecture to her about how things are changing -- and not for the better, in his view:

Look at the rest...

A Government Shutdown Looks Increasingly Likely

With one house of Congress already on August recess and Republican lawmakers readying a bid to defund Planned Parenthood in September, the chances for a government shutdown are rising on the pundit-o-meter.

Longtime budget analyst Stan Collender on Monday raised his semi-mathematical odds for a shutdown from a previous 40 percent to 60 percent. “It’s now more likely than not that a shutdown will result from the craziness going on in Washington,” he wrote on his Forbes Magazine blog. With few appropriations bills passed, few legislative days left and presidential veto threats looming, “in budget technical terms, the House and Senate leadership will be flying by the seat of its pants.”

On this weekend’s “McLaughlin Group” panel broadcast, where semi-mathematical predictions have run amok since the 1980s, the dialog went as follows:

HOST JOHN MCLAUGHLIN: Question: Are we in for Capitol Hill fireworks this fall? Eleanor?

ELEANOR CLIFT OF THE DAILY BEAST: This will be the fall from hell, but not because Speaker Boehner is in any kind of jeopardy. . . They’re going to bump up against the spending cliffs. They’re probably going to shut down the government over defunding Planned Parenthood.

AUTHOR AND COLUMNIST PAT BUCHANAN...

Conservative Blogger Wants GOP to Shut Down the Government Over Planned Parenthood

The federal government is in danger of a shutdown this fall over a disagreement between Republicans and the Obama administration on broad spending levels. But, if influential blogger Erick Erickson has his way, there will be a shutdown for a narrower reason. 

Erickson wants lawmakers to protest funding to reproductive health organization Planned Parenthood.

"Shut down the government if that is what it takes. Shut it down now. If we cannot stand on this high ground, we should not stand at all," the RedState.com editor-in-chief wrote Thursday on the site.

Erickson said Planned Parenthood does not need or deserve federal grants -- which amounted to $538 million in 2013-2014, according to The Wall Street Journal. The organization brings in plenty of money on its own, Erickson said: 

Despite making that much money, the federal government gives Planned Parenthood millions of dollars each year. The Democrats say the money does not pay for abortions, but your federal taxpayer dollars subsidize an organization that could do quite well on its own.

Erickson criticized congressional leaders over the touchstone Republican issue.

"John Boehner and Mitch McConnell are engaged in failure theater over the news. They are ensuring that votes to defund Planned Parenthood...

Federal Employee Union Backs Out of Giving Donald Trump a Tour at the Border

A union representing federal employees has reversed course on giving a tour of its work area to Donald Trump, saying it does not want to give the appearance of an endorsement.

The National Border Patrol Council’s Local 2455, which represents BP agents in Laredo, Texas, originally agreed to give the billionaire and controversial Republican presidential candidate a tour of the U.S.-Mexico border to show him the situation on the ground. The union abruptly pulled out of that agreement, however, after “communicating with members of the NBPC at the national level.” NBPC is a division of the American Federation of Government Employees.

“An endorsement was never discussed for any presidential candidate. Local 2455 does not endorse candidates for any political office,” said Hector Garza, the local's president, in a statement Thursday. “For these reasons, Local 2455 will not participate in any events with Mr. Trump.”

The intention behind the tour, Garza said, was to give Trump -- and the members of the media that follow him -- a “boots on the ground” perspective.

“Our purpose is to support and protect the men and women who protect our borders,” Garza said. “Make no mistake, our border with Mexico is not...