Flexible Fleet

Maritime strategy targets traditional and new age threats.

Chief of Naval Operations Adm. Michael G. Mullen is calling on the Navy to develop a sweeping new maritime strategy to reflect rapidly changing threats and missions.

In a June speech at the Naval War College in Newport, R.I., Mullen said the Navy can no longer follow Cold War-era strategies, but must become more flexible and agile to operate in an intertwined world and battle unpredictable adversaries. He acknowledged, however, that developing the plan and carrying it out would be difficult.

"Let's be frank," Mullen said. "The reason we don't have such a new maritime strategy already is that the scope and scale of the threat, the issues involved, the complexity of this globalized era and the staggering pace of change seem almost impossible to plan for."

Mullen's speech is the latest in his attempts to transform the service, coming just months after he unveiled a plan to build a fleet of 313 ships designed to serve as a blueprint for the service's technological future.

The strategy is a compromise of sorts for two camps inside the Navy: those who want to focus on technologies designed to fight the global war on terrorism, and those who want to transform the fleet to compete with a rapidly maturing Chinese navy, says Robert Work, a senior defense analyst at the Center for Strategic and Budgetary Assessments in Washington.

"You have these two general groups," Work says. "The direction of transformation would be much different, depending on which group holds sway." Preparing for a possible altercation with China, for instance, would require the next generation of traditional platforms, such as the attack submarine and aircraft carrier. But anti-terror campaigns against nonstate enemies require smaller, nimbler sea craft, such as patrol boats.

Mullen's plan, Work notes, falls somewhere in the middle, in an apparent effort to prepare his service for a broad swath of potential adversaries. It would set aside substantial funding for new submarines, destroyers and carriers, but it also fields the lower-cost Littoral Combat Ship, which is designed to operate in coastal waters and counter asymmetric threats. The service also intends to create a naval force capable of fighting in rivers and possibly purchase a fleet of inexpensive patrol boats.

"The Navy will try to do both," Work says. "It really is now a juggling act on resources." Some lawmakers are wary, saying the strategy takes too many risks by retiring ships before their replacements are ready for the water.

The plan hit another snag recently when the Congressional Budget Office concluded that it would cost far more than Mullen's estimate of $14 billion annually to purchase new submarines, destroyers, carriers and other ships.

Transforming the fleet will be a difficult sell overall on Capitol Hill. House members in particular are moving to safeguard their prized programs, which Navy officials fear will pose substantial risk to the rest of the fleet.

As with everything else, the Navy's ability to carry out its maritime strategy hinges largely on the defense procurement budget, which many fear has hit its peak. "In FY '07, the Navy looks pretty good," Work says. "FY '08 is going to be a tough year, though."

Stay up-to-date with federal news alerts and analysis — Sign up for GovExec's email newsletters.
Close [ x ] More from GovExec

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from GovExec.com.
We think these reports might interest you:

  • Forecasting Cloud's Future

    Conversations with Federal, State, and Local Technology Leaders on Cloud-Driven Digital Transformation

  • The Big Data Campaign Trail

    With everyone so focused on security following recent breaches at federal, state and local government and education institutions, there has been little emphasis on the need for better operations. This report breaks down some of the biggest operational challenges in IT management and provides insight into how agencies and leaders can successfully solve some of the biggest lingering government IT issues.

  • Communicating Innovation in Federal Government

    Federal Government spending on ‘obsolete technology’ continues to increase. Supporting the twin pillars of improved digital service delivery for citizens on the one hand, and the increasingly optimized and flexible working practices for federal employees on the other, are neither easy nor inexpensive tasks. This whitepaper explores how federal agencies can leverage the value of existing agency technology assets while offering IT leaders the ability to implement the kind of employee productivity, citizen service improvements and security demanded by federal oversight.

  • IT Transformation Trends: Flash Storage as a Strategic IT Asset

    MIT Technology Review: Flash Storage As a Strategic IT Asset For the first time in decades, IT leaders now consider all-flash storage as a strategic IT asset. IT has become a new operating model that enables self-service with high performance, density and resiliency. It also offers the self-service agility of the public cloud combined with the security, performance, and cost-effectiveness of a private cloud. Download this MIT Technology Review paper to learn more about how all-flash storage is transforming the data center.

  • Ongoing Efforts in Veterans Health Care Modernization

    This report discusses the current state of veterans health care


When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.