Flirting With Disaster

Removing FEMA from Homeland Security would only make coordination problems worse.

When the House Transportation and Infrastructure Committee approved a bill to remove the Federal Emergency Management Agency from the Homeland Security Department, its goal was to better position the agency for disaster response. Make no mistake; pulling FEMA out of DHS would be a disaster in itself. What the agency really needs is better support from Congress, better integration with other parts of DHS, and retooling to meet an evolving mission.

A reorganization would waste valuable time and energy when the agency needs to focus on making sure the nation is prepared for all types of hazards. Separating FEMA would clutter the field with yet another independent federal bureaucracy that would compete with DHS for resources, fracture the homeland security community and confuse roles and responsibilities among the two agencies. This at a time when many states are merging their homeland security and emergency management functions.

Would FEMA handle natural hazards response and DHS manage all disaster preparedness but respond only to terrorism incidents? Or would FEMA handle both preparedness and response for natural hazards and DHS do the same in cases of terrorism? What if it's unclear whether an incident is a terrorist attack, accident or natural disaster?

Many say the reason FEMA failed during Hurricane Katrina is that it was hamstrung as an arm of DHS. The Katrina response was a failure largely because New Orleans and Louisiana were woefully unprepared despite receiving tens of millions of dollars to get ready. FEMA failed as well on many fronts, key among them being its inability to recognize the dysfunctional situation in Louisiana and the need for a far more rapid and aggressive federal response.

Some proponents of moving FEMA believe it would offer a chance to relive the glory days of emergency management in the Clinton administration. But those glory days are not what they might seem. During that time, FEMA had not faced a catastrophe anywhere near the scale of the Sept. 11 attacks in 2001 or Hurricane Katrina. The most significant events were the 1993 World Trade Center bombing, the Northridge earthquake in California in 1994, Oklahoma City's Alfred P. Murrah federal building bombing in 1995 and Hurricane Floyd in 1999. All were major events, some of which also involved criticism of FEMA's response, but the size and scope of damage-and federal resources needed-pale in comparison to larger events. No one really knows how FEMA at that time would have handled a catastrophe that devastated state and local resources.

It's true the agency faces challenges inside DHS, and Congress needs to address them. This includes developing clear lines of responsibility between Homeland Security's National Operations Center and FEMA's National Response Coordination Center; determining which tasks FEMA should manage directly or outsource to other agencies and the private sector, such as the logistics of moving supplies into a disaster zone; and creating an intergovernmental-private sector catastrophic planning framework to minimize the next Katrina-sized event.

FEMA has a critical homeland security mission and needs proper support from Congress, not another reorganization. Retooling the agency and truly integrating it into DHS is the key to success. It's time to get on with it.

Joshua D. Filler is founder and president of Filler Security Strategies Inc. in Washington and was director of state and local government coordination at the Homeland Security Department from 2003 to 2005.

Stay up-to-date with federal news alerts and analysis — Sign up for GovExec's email newsletters.
Close [ x ] More from GovExec

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from
We think these reports might interest you:

  • Forecasting Cloud's Future

    Conversations with Federal, State, and Local Technology Leaders on Cloud-Driven Digital Transformation

  • The Big Data Campaign Trail

    With everyone so focused on security following recent breaches at federal, state and local government and education institutions, there has been little emphasis on the need for better operations. This report breaks down some of the biggest operational challenges in IT management and provides insight into how agencies and leaders can successfully solve some of the biggest lingering government IT issues.

  • Communicating Innovation in Federal Government

    Federal Government spending on ‘obsolete technology’ continues to increase. Supporting the twin pillars of improved digital service delivery for citizens on the one hand, and the increasingly optimized and flexible working practices for federal employees on the other, are neither easy nor inexpensive tasks. This whitepaper explores how federal agencies can leverage the value of existing agency technology assets while offering IT leaders the ability to implement the kind of employee productivity, citizen service improvements and security demanded by federal oversight.

  • IT Transformation Trends: Flash Storage as a Strategic IT Asset

    MIT Technology Review: Flash Storage As a Strategic IT Asset For the first time in decades, IT leaders now consider all-flash storage as a strategic IT asset. IT has become a new operating model that enables self-service with high performance, density and resiliency. It also offers the self-service agility of the public cloud combined with the security, performance, and cost-effectiveness of a private cloud. Download this MIT Technology Review paper to learn more about how all-flash storage is transforming the data center.

  • Ongoing Efforts in Veterans Health Care Modernization

    This report discusses the current state of veterans health care


When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.