January 22, 2013
"And we must be a source of hope to the poor, the sick, the marginalized, the victims of prejudice- not out of mere charity, but because peace in our time requires the constant advance of those principles that our common creed describes: tolerance and opportunity; human dignity and justice."
-- Barack Obama, January 21, 2013
Perhaps the most memorable paragraph of the president's second Inaugural Address -- a paradoxical line likely to resonate, offered without any evident trace of irony, and proof again that it's always easier in politics to be more candid about someone else's problems than your own -- was uttered not about the United States but about the rest of the world. "We will support democracy from Asia to Africa, from the Americas to the Middle East," Obama said Monday, "because our interests and our conscience compels us to act on behalf of those who long for freedom."
And then he spoke the words highlighted above, an RFK-style "ripples of hope" riff if there ever were one. Except it was not here a call to arms in the name of "our wives, our mothers and daughters," or in the name of "our gay brothers and sisters," or in the name of "striving, hopeful immigrants," or in the name of "all our children," or in the name of an America that has ever existed or which exists today. It was instead a call to arms on behalf of ordinary people who live in other countries, as if our own democracy is so safe and vibrant that we have extra time and energy to preach it to others.
In support of the exercise of democracy here at home, after a presidential election marked by awidespread partisan voter suppression, the president was oddly passive. "Our journey is not complete until no citizen is forced to wait for hours to exercise the right to vote," he said Monday, standing on Martin Luther King Day near icons who had suffered for that most basic of civil rights. The line was as vague and as was Obama's election-night throwaway-- "we have to fix that," he said early on November 7 -- and made no mention of the continuing vitality of the Voting Rights Act, which the Supreme Court is poised to strike down this very term.
Read more at The Atlantic.
January 22, 2013