Sequestration Could Mean 14-Day Furloughs, RIFs at Homeland Security

AP file photo

The across-the-board budget cuts scheduled to take effect March 1 would force the Homeland Security Department to furlough law enforcement personnel for up to 14 days, DHS Secretary Janet Napolitano told a House lawmaker Wednesday.

Sequestration could also result in reductions in force at the department, she wrote in a Feb. 13 letter to Rep. Bennie Thompson, D-Miss., circulated by the National Treasury Employees Union. She did not provide an overall number of employees who would be furloughed, but said it would be a “significant portion” of the department’s front-line law enforcement staff.

“Reductions mandated by sequestration would undermine the significant progress the department has made over the past 10 years and would negatively affect our ability to carry out our vital missions,” Napolitano wrote. “Sequestration would roll back border security, increase wait times at our nation’s land ports of entry and airports, affect aviation and maritime safety and security, leave critical infrastructure vulnerable to attacks, hamper disaster response time and our Surge Force capabilities, and significantly scale back cybersecurity infrastructure protections that have been developed in recent years.”

Among other examples, she noted staffing reductions at Customs and Border Protection and in the Transportation Security Administration’s frontline workforce, and furloughs and decreases in overtime at the Secret Service. She also listed a range of impacts not directly related to the workforce. The department could not move forward with modernizing its financial management systems, for instance.

Napolitano urged lawmakers to head off the cuts. “We simply cannot absorb the additional reduction posed by sequestration without significantly negatively affecting frontline operations and our nation’s previous investments in the homeland security enterprise,” she wrote.

In addition to hindering DHS’ ability to fulfill its mission, sequestration could result in “significant loss of pay or even job loss for the dedicated and highly-trained officers and other frontline CBP personnel,” NTEU President Colleen Kelley noted in a statement. The union represents 150,000 employees in 31 agencies, including CBP workers.

“This would be devastating for these employees, their families and the communities around the country that rely on them to keep us safe and to facilitate trade and travel,” Kelley stated.

Napolitano’s letter comes as the White House, Pentagon and federal agencies are publicizing the consequences of moving forward with the reductions, and as federal employee groups rally against sequestration. President Obama also highlighted the problems with this deficit-cutting approach in his State of the Union speech Tuesday night, though he did not offer a specific way to avoid it. “These sudden, harsh, arbitrary cuts would jeopardize our military readiness,” he said. “They’d devastate priorities like education, energy and medical research. They would certainly slow our recovery, and cost us hundreds of thousands of jobs.”

Stay up-to-date with federal news alerts and analysis — Sign up for GovExec's email newsletters.
FROM OUR SPONSORS
JOIN THE DISCUSSION
Close [ x ] More from GovExec
 
 

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from GovExec.com.
We think these reports might interest you:

  • Sponsored by G Suite

    Cross-Agency Teamwork, Anytime and Anywhere

    Dan McCrae, director of IT service delivery division, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA)

    Download
  • Data-Centric Security vs. Database-Level Security

    Database-level encryption had its origins in the 1990s and early 2000s in response to very basic risks which largely revolved around the theft of servers, backup tapes and other physical-layer assets. As noted in Verizon’s 2014, Data Breach Investigations Report (DBIR)1, threats today are far more advanced and dangerous.

    Download
  • Federal IT Applications: Assessing Government's Core Drivers

    In order to better understand the current state of external and internal-facing agency workplace applications, Government Business Council (GBC) and Riverbed undertook an in-depth research study of federal employees. Overall, survey findings indicate that federal IT applications still face a gamut of challenges with regard to quality, reliability, and performance management.

    Download
  • PIV- I And Multifactor Authentication: The Best Defense for Federal Government Contractors

    This white paper explores NIST SP 800-171 and why compliance is critical to federal government contractors, especially those that work with the Department of Defense, as well as how leveraging PIV-I credentialing with multifactor authentication can be used as a defense against cyberattacks

    Download
  • Toward A More Innovative Government

    This research study aims to understand how state and local leaders regard their agency’s innovation efforts and what they are doing to overcome the challenges they face in successfully implementing these efforts.

    Download
  • From Volume to Value: UK’s NHS Digital Provides U.S. Healthcare Agencies A Roadmap For Value-Based Payment Models

    The U.S. healthcare industry is rapidly moving away from traditional fee-for-service models and towards value-based purchasing that reimburses physicians for quality of care in place of frequency of care.

    Download
  • GBC Flash Poll: Is Your Agency Safe?

    Federal leaders weigh in on the state of information security

    Download

When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.