Computer security could be tied to agencies’ funding

House Government Reform Chairman Tom Davis, R-Va., said Thursday that agencies could have their budgets cut if their information technology security does not improve.

With several agencies struggling to meet requirements of the 2002 Federal Information Security Management Act, Davis said that compliance eventually has to be tied to funding. He also said that more time is needed for agencies to fall in line with the law.

"FISMA report cards are going to have to be tied to funding," Davis said. "That's often the only way to get [the agencies'] attention."

In an annual review by the committee, seven agencies received failing grades, which is one less than in 2003. The overall grade inched up 2.5 points to a D+ for cybersecurity, up from a D in 2003.

Davis said financial penalties only would be implemented if agencies do not continue to improve. He would not specify how much the penalties would be or at what point they would be implemented.

"Even the [agencies receiving failing grades] are trying hard to get there," Davis told Government Executive. "FISMA is just a few years old. You have to give them some time."

At a committee hearing Thursday, Davis questioned chief information officers from agencies that achieved the highest cybersecurity grades -- the Agency for International Development(which earned an A+) and the Transportation Department (with an A-)-- and the lowest achiever, the Homeland Security Department, which received an F.

"All you need is one… cyber attack and everyone will be all over this," Davis said. "They are going to ask who the fall guy is, and it's not going to be me."

Steve Cooper, DHS' chief information officer, who is leaving the agency later this month, told the panel that he is hoping the department achieves a D by fiscal 2006, but does not see its score improving in the next year because of the amount of time it takes to certify and accredit all of DHS' 3,600 systems. By comparison, Cooper said, AID must certify and accredit less than 10 systems, and Transportation must secure 480 systems.

Davis told panel participant Karen Evans, the Office of Management and Budget's administrator for electronic government, that he is pleased with the efforts to standardize cybersecurity. "It's not how much money you spend, but how well you spend it," Davis said.

Evans said that agency security procedures remain deficient largely due to the complexity of securing the many systems. She said inconsistency in FISMA implementation and unnecessary duplication are areas of concern for OMB.

The budget agency is working on new FISMA guidances regarding the privacy of information collected and performance requirements, according to Evans.

"While notable progress in resolving IT security weaknesses has been made, problems continue, and new threats and vulnerabilities continue to materialize," she said.

Evans added that creating an inspector general auditing framework similar to that used for financial audits would limit information sharing and keep agencies from being flexible in how they implement their cybersecurity resources.

"FISMA is an evaluation, not an audit," Evans said. "If it turns into an audit evaluation, it is less of an exchange of information."

Stay up-to-date with federal news alerts and analysis — Sign up for GovExec's email newsletters.
Close [ x ] More from GovExec

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from
We think these reports might interest you:

  • Sponsored by G Suite

    Cross-Agency Teamwork, Anytime and Anywhere

    Dan McCrae, director of IT service delivery division, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA)

  • Data-Centric Security vs. Database-Level Security

    Database-level encryption had its origins in the 1990s and early 2000s in response to very basic risks which largely revolved around the theft of servers, backup tapes and other physical-layer assets. As noted in Verizon’s 2014, Data Breach Investigations Report (DBIR)1, threats today are far more advanced and dangerous.

  • Federal IT Applications: Assessing Government's Core Drivers

    In order to better understand the current state of external and internal-facing agency workplace applications, Government Business Council (GBC) and Riverbed undertook an in-depth research study of federal employees. Overall, survey findings indicate that federal IT applications still face a gamut of challenges with regard to quality, reliability, and performance management.

  • PIV- I And Multifactor Authentication: The Best Defense for Federal Government Contractors

    This white paper explores NIST SP 800-171 and why compliance is critical to federal government contractors, especially those that work with the Department of Defense, as well as how leveraging PIV-I credentialing with multifactor authentication can be used as a defense against cyberattacks

  • Toward A More Innovative Government

    This research study aims to understand how state and local leaders regard their agency’s innovation efforts and what they are doing to overcome the challenges they face in successfully implementing these efforts.

  • From Volume to Value: UK’s NHS Digital Provides U.S. Healthcare Agencies A Roadmap For Value-Based Payment Models

    The U.S. healthcare industry is rapidly moving away from traditional fee-for-service models and towards value-based purchasing that reimburses physicians for quality of care in place of frequency of care.

  • GBC Flash Poll: Is Your Agency Safe?

    Federal leaders weigh in on the state of information security


When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.