TOPICS
TOPICS
Pentagon drops plans to convert union employees to NSPS
The Defense Department is dropping plans to convert employees represented by labor unions to its new personnel system, at least for now, the program's top personnel official said Monday.
Brad Bunn, program executive officer for the National Security Personnel System, told Government Executive that the current Defense leadership has no plans to extend its pay for performance system to employees in bargaining units.
"We haven't come out and made a declarative statement that we'll never bring them in," Bunn said. "We could accommodate, but what we're being clear with now is that we have a departmental position that we're not bringing them in."
Bunn was responding to questions about new regulations governing NSPS that were published Friday and drew widespread criticism from federal unions. Those regulations bring NSPS in compliance with federal rules covering such subjects as labor relations, adverse actions and employee appeals. Congress mandated the changes in the fiscal 2008 Defense Authorization Act after years of litigation by federal unions against the department's proposed rules for the system.
But with no current plans in place to convert bargaining unit employees to the system, Bunn said, the labor relations provisions of the new rules would apply only to employees who form a bargaining unit after converting to NSPS. The American Federation of Government Employees said Friday that they currently represent about 300 such employees.
About 270,000 white-collar Defense employees are represented by labor unions. The department has added more than 181,500 non-bargaining unit employees to NSPS since 2006 and plans to bring an additional 20,000 into the system this fall, bringing it close to converting all 205,000 non-bargaining unit employees.
AFGE officials said Friday that the final regulations do not fully comply with federal labor law, largely because provisions defining employees' rates of pay are too specific and therefore narrow the scope of bargaining.
Bunn said that several unions expressed concerns about the rate of pay definition during the comment period, and while Defense deleted a portion of the definition in the final rules, it was still necessary to fully define the concept. He added that while unions will be unable to negotiate actual rates of pay, they can bargain over the procedures used to make those decisions.
"We did address and accommodate [the union's] concern, but we still felt strongly that we needed to have a definition of rate of pay," Bunn said. "There's no universal definition in our statute or regulations, and it's used in various ways in federal regulations."
Bunn added that Defense will follow traditional federal labor law and will use the standard rulemaking process to make any changes to the system. "I would not characterize it as any different from collective bargaining in other agencies," he said. "We made the regulations more robust to capture the need for uniformity and consistency ... but they do not preclude [following federal labor law]."
Rep. Ike Skelton, D-Mo., and Sen. Carl Levin, D-Mich., chairmen of the House and Senate Armed Services committees, sent a letter Sept. 10 to Deputy Defense Secretary Gordon England, urging the department to refrain from finalizing the rules until a new administration had the opportunity to review them.
"We strongly believe that the proposed regulations go beyond the intent of the revisions made to NSPS in the [defense authorization measure] for fiscal 2008," the chairmen wrote. "The intent of this legislation was to restore the collective bargaining rights of DoD employees."
But Bunn said it was necessary to implement the regulations in order to align NSPS with the 2008 law. "We needed to make sure that NSPS itself is on a stable regulatory base," he said, "meaning we have the law, the enabling regulations and internal policies operating in tandem."
Bunn also pointed to additional changes to the regulations that were not mandated by Congress, including a provision that requires individual agencies to share aggregate pay pool results -- including average ratings and payouts -- with NSPS employees. The final rules also provide a roadmap for managers in making pay and rating decisions, he said.
"We put parameters to tell managers, 'if you're going to make [payout and ratings] decisions, here's what you have to consider," Bunn said. "Personal bias and favoritism are prohibited, but managers should communicate to employees that these decisions are based on performance, the job or how the organization is approaching compensation."
COMMENTS
- I agree NSPS is an aggregious pay and reward system and grossly unfair. I came into NSPS and the federal government straight from the private sector (where I wish I had stayed and am reconsidering)about 3 years ago. Having never worked under GS I was basically forced to take a pay cut to get into the government and told essentially the offer on the table was their best and final (A GS-11 equivalent). Since coming on board, I have been "reassigned" (to use NSPS lingo)twice to positions once held by GS-13's and never earned GS-13 equivalent money for doing the work of either position. Each time I received a measley 5% adjustment to base salary and was told this was the best they could do under the pay rules for NSPS. The GS pay system would have looked at both of these "reassignments" as promotions and I would have been compensated accordingly. I do my job well and receive 4 ratings. This is a broken system and affords unfair pay and rewards to its employees. I am now a manager/supervisor and still not earning anywhere near a GS-13 equivalent salary, yet I perform the same task and responsibilities as they do, and, in my opinion perhaps more competently. My colleagues who were GS-13's before the NSPS conversion are being compensated in my opinion properly for being a manager/supervisor. What has NSPS fixed? Wasn't the system designed to attract and retain talent? Well, this talent may be headed for the door. The $20K-$30K pay gap between myself and my colleagues is embarassing and becoming unbearable and burdensome (I work hard for nothing)and is easily made up in the private sector, even with this economy - I took a pay cut just to get to this point. I feel truly slighted and treated unfairly and my feelings are really hurt behind this. Tell me what's fair in NSPS! Highly Upset NSPS Manager Posted July 17, 2009 9:10 AM
- NSPS is ridiculous.... I've seen a pay pool manager's salary increase from 76K to 107K in 2 years. His two cronies have gotten annual an avg salary raise of 5k each of the last two years..I am absolutely dumbfounded he is getting away with this....this system will never work there is no built in oversight. Managers hold everyone down and reward themselves with a bigger piece of the pie..I doubt it will matter but i will report this to IG and Army Auditing since there is an obvious breach of trust and conflict of interest.. Corporate nepotism Posted February 27, 2009 12:25 AM
- Many of you work in areas where you can transfer to other civil service jobs. Consider yourself blessed, because government jobs here are few and far between. What I have to say about NSPS is that it should be done away with. It was designed to rid people who have been sitting in postions, doing nothing and exclaiming "that is not in my job description". Reading these posted comments,I gather those "kind" are still sitting at their desks. With that being said, can't the creators of NSPS see that they have failed to do that very thing they set out to do? A fellow employee at another rotc unit told me that her ranking supervisor was told that he ranked his one and only employee TOO HIGH and that he heeded to change his comments! How can someone who knows NOTHING about what you do, tell your supervisor you need to be ranked lower? And for people like me who have been here over 20 years and were at the top of the pay band as a GS, we get the shaft for the dedication and the many years we have been faithful, good employees! I, too, am ready for a CHANGE, Mr. Obama. Please save us from this cesspool! Bummed out in Texas Marci Ward Posted January 14, 2009 9:42 AM
PROMO RIGHT: GBC
Advancing the business of government through analysis, insight and the sharing of best practices.
SPONSORED RESEARCH
Achieving a Greener Federal Government IBM
Federal Cybersecurity: Securing the Nation's Information IBM
American Recovery and Reinvestment Act: New Requirements for Tracking and Reporting Federal Workforce Data Kronos
Managing the Stimulus: A Candid Survey of Federal Program Managers Accenture and Microsoft
Improving Collaboration and Productivity in 21st Century Government: The Role of Communication for Government Executives Cisco









