TOPICS

Defense Secretary Robert Gates' plan to significantly increase the size of his department's acquisition workforce could face steep logistical and practical challenges, industry officials and observers said Tuesday.

On Monday, Gates announced his long-awaited fiscal 2010 Defense budget proposal. Among the secretary's recommendations were converting 11,000 acquisition support positions into full-time Pentagon employees and hiring an additional 9,000 Defense procurement professionals by 2015.

But, with hundreds of vacant acquisition positions already unfilled throughout the federal bureaucracy -- and with stiff competition guaranteed from the private sector -- some fear that Defense might find it difficult to attract the best and brightest.


RELATED STORIES

Stan Soloway, president of the Professional Services Council, a contractor trade association, said that for Defense to attract a high caliber of acquisition professionals, it might have to become more competitive in terms of salaries, benefits and professional development.

"There is already a shortfall of acquisition professionals across the government," Soloway said. "DoD is going to face a number of challenges in terms of competition. ... Simply creating and funding a position does not necessarily mean that the position will be filled."

On Tuesday, PSC sent Gates a letter offering its recommendations and suggestions on the reform plan.

In total, Gates called for Defense to reduce the number of support service contractors from its current level of 39 percent of the workforce to its pre-2001 level of 26 percent.

The Pentagon would replace those contractors during the next five years with 39,000 new full-time government employees, 20,000 of which would be acquisition professionals. At least 13,000 new civil servants, including 4,100 acquisition officers, would be added next year.

Altogether, the Defense acquisition workforce would grow 15 percent over the next five years, from 127,000 to 147,000--a level not reached since 1998, said Chris Isleib, a Pentagon spokesman.

Details were less clear, however, about the process the department will use to reduce the number of contractors that support the government acquisition process.

Soloway urged Defense to follow a strategic approach focusing first on core positions that are either inherently governmental or for which transitioning the work back into government would provide a measurable benefit -- either in cost or by performance.

"If it is not strategic, it is not going to work," he said.

Isleib said Defense would use a phased approach, expected to last five years, to transition contract positions that are "inherently governmental" back to the civil service. The department, he said, would wait until support contracts end to make changes and then open the positions for competition with the public.

Among the positions that will be added are 2,500 contract overseers at the Defense Contract Management Agency, 800 pricing and cost estimating specialists, 250 attorneys, and 600 auditors at the Defense Contract Audit Agency.

One problem is that Defense has never fully outlined a policy regarding how many contract support professionals it needs as compared to government acquisition staffers, said Dave Patterson, executive director of the National Defense Business Institute at the University of Tennessee in Knoxville. The institute is focused on helping the department, other federal agencies and the defense industry improve their acquisition and business management programs.

"The most important thing is that Defense is going to have to establish what constitutes a government employee and what constitutes a contractor support employee," Patterson said. "They are going to have to take a disciplined, measured approach about what needs to be done."

An official at the American Federation of Government Employees, a labor union that represents Defense workers, said the organization backs Gates' plan, but also has concerns about how the conversion of 11,000 contractor support staff would be implemented.

"You don't just wave a magic wand and turn 11,000 contractors into government employees," said Mark Gibson, an AFGE labor relations specialist. "There will be some process hoops they have to jump through."

Despite the host of unanswered questions -- some of which will be worked out as the plan moves through the congressional appropriations cycle -- observers said Gates' proposal puts Defense on the right footing and reverses some controversial personnel decisions dating back to the Clinton administration.

"This plan should not come as any surprise to anyone," Patterson said. "This is the consequences of the less-than-thoughtful plan in the 1990s to decrease the size of government."

COMMENTS

  • All we hear is news about shortages of 1102s, lack of experience and the right skill set. It's all just a bunch of mubo jumbo, otherwise the government would do what it has to do to retain good 1102s. However, it does nothing! Create a special salary, offer benefits such as telework or AWS. Surely, the Pentagon has thousands of creative, innovative thinkers that can come up with an easy solution for this problem. Heck, hire a contracted thinktank to figure it out! Isn't that what we do? Good 1102s will NOT be retained unless there are attractive incentives. Get with the program government.
  • The current government workforce is the biggest group of expensive welfare recipients in America. While it is right to give a Vet favorable hiring preference over someone who had not served in the armed forces, the Vet does not have the right to own the job given to him, if he cannot or will not perform the duties. The reality is that a Vet who can fog a glass will be hired into the government over non-vet with true experience and ability to do the job. There are 3 types of government workers: 1 – The capable, 2 – the somewhat capable, 3 – the incompetent. Unfortunately, over 60% of the government workforce comprise of those in group 3. Those in group 1 are so few, that they cannot absorb all the work for group 3. This is why most of the government’s daily operation is run by the contractors, because somebody has to do the work. Worse yet, the incompetent cannot be fired for incompetence! There is no punishment for failure or incompetence. Yeah – despite supposed rules on the books that allows such firing, it nearly takes an act of Congress to do so. Try that in the private sector. Perversely, during the boom years, the government managed to push up the federal employee’s wage to “compete” with the private sector. However, no one in the private sector can be hired into the government unless he is a former Vet. So the effect of this is that the incompetence in group 3 got their wages boosted; more reward for incompetence. This is why our taxes are so high and we can’t compete with the rest of the world.
  • To: No Name - Fed Up - Historically you did not need a JD or MD to practice law or medicine. In the past you could be a CPA with a BS....now it takes a MS. Increasing standards for a career field is not about how "hard or easy" it is. It is about coming up with some uniformed standards. If you want to get rid of Degrees??? Fine. Then let’s go to a National exam. Similar to the NCMA exam. No chance right...people will whine about the exam as much or more than the degree requirements. Usually, those that complain about education lack education. Those that can't test complain about testing. But the fact remains being an 1102 is much harder that people think (unless you are doing low level SAP contracting and those people should be reclassified as 1105s). Some how we need uniformed standards and training. I can’t think of One Career field in the GOV that really requires PHD or a JD or a MS. (you could just train the folks to do the job) Believe me when I tell you that you could be a great lawyer w/o a JD. In fact I think you can still “read in” for the bar exam in New York. But most State Bar Associations decided some years back that in order to sit for their exam (which allowed you to practice law) you would need a JD. Uniformed Standards! But by all means you could be a good lawyer without a JD. Same point applies to the 1102 career field.